Rapid Critical Appraisal for reviewing articles.
Appendix B4: Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Quasi-Experimental Studies
Explain your answers and recommendation for use of this study in the body of evidence to answer your PICOT question.
VALIDITY
|
1. Are the results of the study valid? |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
Rationale/Comment |
|
· Study participants in intervention and comparison groups are similar |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
· The intervention is clearly identified. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
· There is a control group. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
· Participants in the comparison group(s) received a reasonable treatment/care to the exposure or intervention of interest given to the intervention group. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
· Follow-up between groups is adequately described and analysed. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
· Appropriate statistical analysis was used for the data gathered. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
· Measurement of the outcome was obtained pre and post the intervention. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
· The outcomes are the same across all groups were measured with the same instrument |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
· Outcomes were measured with valid and reliable instruments |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
RELIABILITY
2. What are the results?
|
· What was the magnitude of the results? |
|
|
· What was the precision of the results? |
|
APPLICABILITY
3. Will the results help me in caring for my patients?
|
· Were the study patients similar to my own? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
· Will the results lead directly to selecting or avoiding therapy? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
· Are the results useful for reassuring or counseling patients? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
Would you use the study results in your practice to make a difference in patient outcomes?
· If yes, how?
· If yes, why?
· If no, why not?
Additional Comments/Reflections:
Recommendation for article use within a body of evidence:
© Fineout-Overholt 2018 This form may be used for educational, practice change & research purposes without permission