Rapid Critical Appraisal for reviewing articles.

profilekriogial
Appendix_B4_RCA_for_Quasi-Experimental_Studies.docx

Appendix B4: Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for Quasi-Experimental Studies

Explain your answers and recommendation for use of this study in the body of evidence to answer your PICOT question.

VALIDITY

1. Are the results of the study valid?

Yes

No

Unknown

Rationale/Comment

· Study participants in intervention and comparison groups are similar

1

2

3

· The intervention is clearly identified.

1

2

3

· There is a control group.

1

2

3

· Participants in the comparison group(s) received a reasonable treatment/care to the exposure or intervention of interest given to the intervention group.

1

2

3

· Follow-up between groups is adequately described and analysed.

1

2

3

· Appropriate statistical analysis was used for the data gathered.

1

2

3

· Measurement of the outcome was obtained pre and post the intervention.

1

2

3

· The outcomes are the same across all groups were measured with the same instrument

1

2

3

· Outcomes were measured with valid and reliable instruments

1

2

3

RELIABILITY

2. What are the results?

· What was the magnitude of the results?

· What was the precision of the results?

APPLICABILITY

3. Will the results help me in caring for my patients?

· Were the study patients similar to my own?

1

2

3

· Will the results lead directly to selecting or avoiding therapy?

1

2

3

· Are the results useful for reassuring or counseling patients?

1

2

3

Would you use the study results in your practice to make a difference in patient outcomes?

· If yes, how?

· If yes, why?

· If no, why not?

Additional Comments/Reflections:

Recommendation for article use within a body of evidence:

© Fineout-Overholt 2018 This form may be used for educational, practice change & research purposes without permission