Anatomy & Physiology 2 Lab Report

profilemytasia25
APIILabReport-Rubric-1.xls
Home>Biology homework help>Anatomy homework help>Anatomy & Physiology 2 Lab Report

Joe Smith

Student Name Joe Smith
Score 96.25%
100.00% 7
Student Score Criteria Weight Rubric Criteria 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5
Excellent Above Average Average Below Average Poor Unacceptable 0.00% 50.00% 65.00% 75.00% 85.00% 100.00%
100% 85% 75% 65% 50% 0%
5 5.00% Title Describes the lab experiment accurately and successfully communicates to the reader the scientific concept of the lab Describes lab content concisely, adequately and appropriately Describes the lab, but is too long or short. Title is too long or short and does not clearly communicate what the report is about Does not describe the lab well or simply titled as "Lab Report". Absent 5.00%
5 20.00% Introduction Introduction complete, well-written; includes background, purpose & hypothesis. Introduction is nearly complete, missing some minor points Some introductory information, but still missing some major points Little background information provided or information is incorrect Very little background included or information provided is incorrect. Absent 20.00%
3.3 15.00% Methods Well-written in past tense and paragraph format, all experimental details are covered in a logical manner Written in past tense and paragraph format, important experimental details are covered, some minor details missing Written in past tense and paragraph format, still missing some important experimental details Written in paragraph format, missing several important experimental details Missing many important experimental details, or not written in paragraph format. Absent 11.25%
5 20.00% Results Results described in paragraph format. Includes data observations only (no discussion). All figures, graphs, tables are correctly drawn, are numbered and contain titles/captions Results described in paragraph format. Includes data observations only (no discussion). All figures, graphs, tables are correctly drawn, but some have minor problems or could still be improved Results described in paragraph format. Includes data observations and some discussion. Most figures, graphs, tables OK, some still missing some important or required features Results described in paragraph format. Figures, graphs, tables contain errors or are poorly constructed, have missing titles, captions or numbers, units missing or incorrect, etc. Results not described or presented in discussion form. Figures, graphs, tables contain errors or are missing completely. Absent 20.00%
5 20.00% Discussion All important trends and data comparisons have been interpreted correctly and discussed, good understanding of results is conveyed Almost all of the results have been correctly interpreted and discussed, only minor improvements are needed Some of the results have been correctly interpreted and discussed; partial but incomplete understanding of results is still evident Incomplete understanding of results is still evident Very incomplete or incorrect interpretation of trends and comparison of data indicating a lack of understanding of results Absent 20.00%
5 10.00% Citations and Formatting Citations are reliable and references adhere to APA format. All other requirements are met. Citations are mostly reliable and references adhere to APA format. All other requirements are met Citations are somewhat reliable and present. Some adherence to APA format. Citations are not in APA format or are of unreliable sources. Formatting is rough but readable Citations are not reliable or in APA format. Sections out of order. Absent 10.00%
5 10.00% Spelling and Grammar All grammar/spelling correct and very well-written Less than 3 grammar/spelling errors, mature, readable style Less than 5 grammar/spelling errors, mature, readable style Occasional grammar/spelling errors, generally readable with some rough spots in writing style Frequent grammar and/or spelling errors, writing style is rough and immature Very inappropriate language or style. Informal writing, (use of "text-talk"), difficulty forming complete sentences. 10.00%
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0

Jane Doe

Student Name
Score
100.00% 7
Student Score Criteria Weight Rubric Criteria 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5
Excellent Above Average Average Below Average Poor Unacceptable 0.00% 50.00% 65.00% 75.00% 85.00% 100.00%
100% 85% 75% 65% 50% 0%
5.00% Title Describes the lab experiment accurately and successfully communicates to the reader the scientific concept of the lab Describes lab content concisely, adequately and appropriately Describes the lab, but is too long or short. Title is too long or short and does not clearly communicate what the report is about Does not describe the lab well or simply titled as "Lab Report". Absent 0.00%
20.00% Introduction Introduction complete, well-written; includes background, purpose & hypothesis. Introduction is nearly complete, missing some minor points Some introductory information, but still missing some major points Little background information provided or information is incorrect Very little background included or information provided is incorrect. Absent 0.00%
15.00% Methods Well-written in past tense and paragraph format, all experimental details are covered in a logical manner Written in past tense and paragraph format, important experimental details are covered, some minor details missing Written in past tense and paragraph format, still missing some important experimental details Written in paragraph format, missing several important experimental details Missing many important experimental details, or not written in paragraph format. Absent 0.00%
20.00% Results Results described in paragraph format. Includes data observations only (no discussion). All figures, graphs, tables are correctly drawn, are numbered and contain titles/captions Results described in paragraph format. Includes data observations only (no discussion). All figures, graphs, tables are correctly drawn, but some have minor problems or could still be improved Results described in paragraph format. Includes data observations and some discussion. Most figures, graphs, tables OK, some still missing some important or required features Results described in paragraph format. Figures, graphs, tables contain errors or are poorly constructed, have missing titles, captions or numbers, units missing or incorrect, etc. Results not described or presented in discussion form. Figures, graphs, tables contain errors or are missing completely. Absent 0.00%
20.00% Discussion All important trends and data comparisons have been interpreted correctly and discussed, good understanding of results is conveyed Almost all of the results have been correctly interpreted and discussed, only minor improvements are needed Some of the results have been correctly interpreted and discussed; partial but incomplete understanding of results is still evident Incomplete understanding of results is still evident Very incomplete or incorrect interpretation of trends and comparison of data indicating a lack of understanding of results Absent 0.00%
10.00% Citations and Formatting Citations are reliable and references adhere to APA format. All other requirements are met. Citations are mostly reliable and references adhere to APA format. All other requirements are met Citations are somewhat reliable and present. Some adherence to APA format. Citations are not in APA format or are of unreliable sources. Formatting is rough but readable Citations are not reliable or in APA format. Sections out of order. Absent 0.00%
10.00% Spelling and Grammar All grammar/spelling correct and very well-written Less than 3 grammar/spelling errors, mature, readable style Less than 5 grammar/spelling errors, mature, readable style Occasional grammar/spelling errors, generally readable with some rough spots in writing style Frequent grammar and/or spelling errors, writing style is rough and immature Very inappropriate language or style. Informal writing, (use of "text-talk"), difficulty forming complete sentences. 0.00%
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
0.00% 0