Assignment #2

Criteria Ratings Points

Content 15 to >13 pts

Advanced

The logic model is well constructed; establishes goals, objectives and performance indicators required for the theory to be established by the program.

13 to >11 pts

Proficient

The logic model is not comprehensive, accurate or does not make a strong link between the program indicators and theory.

11 to >0 pts

Developing

The logic model is poorly written and does not align with the evaluation strategy proposed.

0 pts

Not Present

15 pts

Content 8 to >7 pts

Advanced

The thesis or research statement is well constructed; introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points.

7 to >5 pts

Proficient

The thesis or research statement is well constructed; introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points.

5 to >0 pts

Developing

The thesis and/or introduction are poorly written or do not align with the title and/or body of the paper.

0 pts

Not Present

8 pts

Content and Focus

13 to >11 pts

Advanced

The content is comprehensive, accurate, and is related to assignment prompt.

11 to >10 pts

Proficient

The content is either: not comprehensive, not accurate, or is not related to the assignment prompt.

10 to >0 pts

Developing

The content is not comprehensive, not accurate, and is not related to assignment prompt.

0 pts

Not Present

13 pts

Content 13 to >11 pts

Advanced

The crime or police problem is stated clearly; is supported by specific details (goals, objectives, and performance indicators), examples of the intervention; and are organized logically.

11 to >10 pts

Proficient

The crime or police problem is not stated clearly but is supported by specific details (goals, objective, and performance indicators), examples of the intervention, or analysis.

10 to >0 pts

Developing

The crime or police problem is not stated clearly and is not supported by specific details (goals, objectives, and performance indicators), examples of the intervention, or analysis.

0 pts

Not Present

13 pts

Anticrime/Prevention Program: Part 2 – Evaluation Strategy/Logic Model Grading Rubric | CJUS801_B01_202320

Criteria Ratings Points

Content 13 to >11 pts

Advanced

Dedicated Christian worldview section exists or is woven throughout the paper; showing the integration of the subject matter, critical thinking, and Christian worldview.

11 to >10 pts

Proficient

General tenets of a biblical worldview are introduced and convey a basic understanding of supporting literature.

10 to >0 pts

Developing

Some biblical concepts are presented but may be narrow in scope, not representing the most essential principles, or may not be congruent with supporting literature.

0 pts

Not Present

13 pts

Content 8 to >7 pts

Advanced

The conclusion is logical, flows from the body of the paper, and reviews the major points.

7 to >6 pts

Proficient

Conclusion is either: not logical, does not flow from the body of the paper, or does not review the major points.

6 to >0 pts

Developing

Conclusion is not logical, does not flow from the body of the paper, and does not review the major points.

0 pts

Not Present

8 pts

Structure 15 to >13 pts

Advanced

• Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the outline. There are 0–2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. • There are 0–1 minor citation errors in current APA format in the required items. The proposed theories are cited properly. • Overall paper is structured per APA: running head, page numbers, title page, spacing, indentions, margins, and headings.

13 to >12 pts

Proficient

• There are 3–5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. • There are 2–3 minor citation errors in current APA format in the required items. The proposed theories are cited. • Few errors in paper structure per APA: running head, page numbers, title page, spacing, indentions, margins, and headings.

12 to >0 pts

Developing

• There are 6–10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. • There are more than 3 citation errors in current APA format in the required items. The theories proposed have no citations. • Multiple errors in paper structure per APA: running head, page numbers, title page, spacing, indentions, margins, and headings.

0 pts

Not Present

15 pts

Anticrime/Prevention Program: Part 2 – Evaluation Strategy/Logic Model Grading Rubric | CJUS801_B01_202320

Criteria Ratings Points

Structure 15 to >13 pts

Advanced

• Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the outline. There are 0–2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. • There are 0–1 minor citation errors in current APA format in the required items. The proposed theories are cited properly. • Overall paper is structured per APA: running head, page numbers, title page, spacing, indentions, margins, and headings.

13 to >12 pts

Proficient

• There are 3–5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. • There are 2–3 minor citation errors in current APA format in the required items. The proposed theories are cited. • Few errors in paper structure per APA: running head, page numbers, title page, spacing, indentions, margins, and headings.

12 to >0 pts

Developing

• There are 6–10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. • There are more than 3 citation errors in current APA format in the required items. The theories proposed have no citations. • Multiple errors in paper structure per APA: running head, page numbers, title page, spacing, indentions, margins, and headings.

0 pts

Not Present

15 pts

Total Points: 100

Anticrime/Prevention Program: Part 2 – Evaluation Strategy/Logic Model Grading Rubric | CJUS801_B01_202320