DoneDont Purchase, Click On This File And It Will Download Automatically

Exam Statement and Context for reflection and writing:

Consistency between Issues

Is it possible to be against abortion on the grounds that it takes a human life , while still being for the death penalty? Why/Why not?

Description: guidelines on how to write your response.

Various research frameworks conducted in the United States of America have outlined that humans are activators and catalysis, and they provide all the Foundation of importance. In other words, human life is a very important attribute that comes along with it. Human life should be subject to sustainable healthcare and education. This is based on the energy and framework and the quality of life. The largest scale of human life is the ecosystem, and who understands how such sectors impact human beings. The nature of adaptability changes human life, and these prints the difference between humans and animals. Human beings can carry out research frameworks and improve their way of life, unlike animals. Human life has greater attributes than the government policy of managing abortion and death penalty cases.

Human life is a very important government policy, and the international community should be against abortions on the ground of the attributes of human life and its integrated importance. If the population will not be against the increased cases of abortion, there is a very high probability of a low population sophomore or various. On the other side, measures should be taken to ensure that corrective action has been initialized. This will limit the chances of increased death penalties. As outlined in the video, it’s quite clear that human life is important and should be accorded the respect that they deserve.

As mentioned above human life should be considered a rightful gift was given by the supreme God. No one has the power to take it away. What needs to be understood is that abortion and the death penalty all result in death. Nevertheless, there exists a huge difference between the two terms. Laws, policies, and regulations are put in place to guide, restrict, and direct people on how best to live in harmony amongst themselves. The essence of laws is to curb the growth and expansion of fugitive people in our society. The main difference between the death penalty and abortion is that while abortion is a crime as prescribed within the law, the death penalty is a punishment whose consequences are directly dictated by the act of the subject in question.

Perhaps every person has their own right and freedom to do whatever they want with their life. Given that people may lack limits in the manner they act and operate, laws and rules are set and implemented to ensure that human actions are controlled and shrined within certain limits to eliminate the aspect of exploitation by others. Abortion is a serious crime in most nations of the world including America. It is a crime in the sense that life begins at conception and any attempt to terminate pregnancy either through chemical means or physical means it is more like killing an innocent infant. Unborn babies have the right to live as any other human being. Unborn babies are innocent and therefore terminating pregnancy through any form of abortion is killing an innocent being who has an equal right to live as the terminator themselves. As opposed to abortion, the death penalty is a regulation put in place as a punishment and warning to those who commit crimes such as rape, terrorism, murder, treason, espionage, and war espionage crimes. It is part of the law that serves as a military justice to the offended. This means that whoever is subjected to the death penalty might have violated laws willingly since they have a full understanding of what are the repercussions of engaging in such serious criminal activities.