Psych

profileReeb79
ANovelApplicationofaBiopsychosocialTheory.pdf

247 Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2016

Study Objectives: Sleep and fatigue difficulties appear to be highly prevalent among individuals with end-stage renal disease and individuals who have received a kidney transplant. While there is some evidence of biopsychosocial factors predicting sleep disturbance in these populations, previous studies have relied on single time point retrospective measurements. Methods: The study utilized a 2-week prospective measurement approach, including one night of polysomnographic measurement, nightly sleep diaries, and self-report measures of health, sleep, and mood. Results: The current study demonstrates that a number of psychological and behavioral factors, including negative mood, quality of life, napping, and caffeine consumption, are related to sleep disturbance among pre- and post-kidney transplant patients. This study also found that many of these factors have different relationships with sleep disturbance when comparing pre- and post-kidney transplant patients. Conclusions: These results suggest that such factors may be worthwhile areas for intervention in treating the symptoms of insomnia among pre- and post- transplant recipients. A nuanced approach to understanding sleep problems is likely warranted when conceptualizing insomnia and developing a treatment plan. Keywords: kidney transplantation, sleep disorders, insomnia Citation: Williams JM, McCrae CS, Rodrigue JR, Patton PR. A novel application of a biopsychosocial theory in the understanding of disturbed sleep before and after kidney transplantation. J Clin Sleep Med 2016;12(2):247–256.

I N T R O D U C T I O N

Sleep complaints are common among individuals with end- stage renal disease (ESRD) and patients who have received kidney transplantation (KTX).1–6 While on dialysis, patients report that sleep disturbance is one of their most prominent symptom complaints.1 Compared to dialysis, kidney transplan- tation is considered the treatment of choice for ESRD due to longer patient survival, fewer morbidities, and better quality of life. Unfortunately, little is known about the relationship between ESRD and sleep or the impact of KTX on that rela- tionship. The research that does exist suggests that the rates of common sleep disorders including insomnia (50% to 75% v 9%), restless legs syndrome (30% to 80% v 5% to 15%), and sleep apnea (~24%), are higher in ESRD than in the general population, and ESRD patients are also at risk for more se- vere sleep apnea.2–7 The rates of these disorders tend to de- crease following KTX (expect apnea), but nonetheless remain elevated compared to normative estimates.8 While consider- able research has focused on predictors of sleep apnea and rest- less legs syndrome (RLS), relatively little research has focused on insomnia in these populations. Additionally, due to a reli- ance on cross-sectional designs and retrospective assessment of insomnia, previous research has been unable to provide greater insights into sleep’s relationships with ESRD. Previous research has been largely atheoretical and has examined in- somnia in relative isolation without consideration of important

S C I E N T I F I C I N V E S T I G AT I O N S

A Novel Application of a Biopsychosocial Theory in the Understanding of Disturbed Sleep before and after Kidney Transplantation Jacob M. Williams, PhD1; Christina S. McCrae, PhD2; James R. Rodrigue, PhD3,4; Pamela R. Patton, PA, MSP5

1Department of Psychology/Neuropsychology, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston, TX; 2Department of Health Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO: 3Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; 4Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 5School of Physician Assistant Studies, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

pii: jc - 0 0 420 -14 ht t p: //dx.doi.org /10. 5 6 6 4 / jc sm. 5 49 4

biopsychosocial relationships that may be relevant in the con- text of ESRD and KTX.

Biopsychosocial Correlates of Sleep and End-Stage Renal Disease There are several biopsychosocial factors which have been found to be associated with ESRD including age, sex, medi- cal comorbidity, psychological distress, quality of life, and fatigue. These factors have also been found to be highly re- lated to insomnia and other sleep disturances. Specifically, older age and medical comorbidities are associated with poorer sleep and poorer outcomes in ESRD patients.9 Also, in the general population, men are more likely to develop sleep

BRIEF SUMMARY Current Knowledge/Study Rationale: This study was conducted in order to explore the biopsychosocial factors contributing to sleep disturbance among patients before and after kidney transplantation. Prior research indicates that sleep problems are extremely common among individuals with end stage renal disease both before and after kidney transplantation but has not provided an explanatory model for these sleep problems. Study Impact: This study confirms the high rates of sleep problems found in prior research and identifies biopsychosocial factors which may contribute to sleep disturbance, particularly insomnia. These results provide evidence for specific factors which may be useful targets in the treatment of insomnia in these populations.

D ow

nl oa

de d

fr om

j cs

m .a

as m

.o rg

b y

69 .2

46 .1

61 .7

7 on

A pr

il 2

1, 2

02 0.

F or

p er

so na

l us

e on

ly . N

o ot

he r

us es

w it

ho ut

p er

m is

si on

. C

op yr

ig ht

2 02

0 A

m er

ic an

A ca

de m

y of

S le

ep M

ed ic

in e.

A ll

r ig

ht s

re se

rv ed

.

248Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2016

JM Williams, CS McCrae, JR Rodrigue et al. Biopsychosocial Research of Sleep before and after Kidney Transplantation

apnea and RLS than are women, while the reverse is true for insomnia.7,10,11 Comorbidity rates between poor sleep, ESRD and psychological distress, particularly anxiety and depres- sion (~60% of dialysis patients), are also high.12,13 ESRD patients who have elevated depressive symptoms report in- creased difficulty falling asleep, staying asleep, waking too early in the morning, and increased fatigue in the morning.14 Quality of life is often compromised among individuals suf- fering from chronic health conditions such as insomnia and ESRD.15,16 Fatigue, which can generally be defined as a per- ceived lack of physical and/or mental energy that interferes with usual or desired activities, is also associated with insom- nia and ESRD.17,18

The Development of Insomnia Research on insomnia in the context of ESRD and KTX has been largely atheoretical, focusing instead on identifying rates of sleep disorders and a limited number of biopsycho- social correlates. While etiological models have aided the de- velopment of treatments for RLS and sleep apnea, research has yet to explore theoretically driven models of the process by which insomnia develops and is maintained over time in these patients. Such theory driven research is important for identifying the mechanisms underlying insomnia and under- standing how to effectively treat insomnia in the context of ESRD and KTX.

According to Spielman’s 3Ps model, the course of chronic insomnia includes predisposing conditions, precipitating cir- cumstances, and perpetuating factors,19 which can be seen in Figure 1.

Predisposing conditions alone are not sufficient to pro- duce chronic insomnia but precede the onset of insomnia and increase the likelihood for its occurrence and could include age, sex, or comorbid medical conditions.7 For ex- ample, predispositions to conditions known to reduce renal functioning may serve as predisposing factors in the subse- quent development of sleep problems. Additionally, previous

research has found increased rates of insomnia among older adults, women, and individuals with comorbid conditions suggesting that these variables are likely to act as predispos- ing factors.7

Precipitating circumstances co-occur with the onset of acute insomnia and might include stressful personal events or rapid shifts in health which are likely related to increased fatigue, changes in mood resulting in emotional arousal, and decreased quality of life.20,21 Fatigue, common among ESRD patients, often accompanies a reduction of daytime activity and a perceived decline in quality of life. The com- bination of reduced activity and increased fatigue can lead to increased idle time in bed and is likely related to mood disturbance.20,22

Insomnia is maintained by perpetuating factors, which may include changes individuals make in their sleep/wake sched- ules or daytime behaviors (e.g., stimulant use and napping) as they attempt to compensate for sleeping poorly.20 Specifi- cally, daytime naps may disrupt the sleep homeostat (drive for sleep that increases the longer one is awake) by meeting some of the sleep drive that typically builds during the day. Based on qualitative reports, as dialysis patients experience increas- ingly altered sleep patterns, including night time awakenings, daytime naps often develop as a compensatory strategy.20 In- dividuals experiencing significant fatigue and sleep problems may utilize stimulant substances (caffeine or nicotine) as a compensatory daytime strategy, which has adverse effects on nighttime sleep.23

The development of chronic insomnia (lasting ≥ 6 months) is often related to a combination of predisposing, precipitating, and perpetuating factors that manifest themselves across bio- psychosocial domains. The current study explores the role of these three sets of factors among individuals at different stages in the development of insomnia.

Application of the 3Ps Model in End Stage Renal Disease In a hypothesized patient scenario an individual with ESRD has progressively declining kidney function which necessi- tates dialysis to maintain adequate blood filtration. Prior to this time, the individual experienced health problems causing increased worry and predisposing them to nighttime sleeping difficulties. Over time, emotional distress about their health increases. While on dialysis, the individual experiences ane- mia and a buildup of waste products in the blood resulting in significant daytime fatigue. In response, they begin to en- gage in increased napping and caffeine consumption to com- pensate for their fatigue. The individual now develops acute insomnia due to biological factors, changes in sleep related compensatory behaviors, and continued worry and emotional distress concerning their health. Over time, perpetuating maladaptive compensatory behaviors become increasingly influential and eventually supersede the impact of the predis- posing and precipitating factors. The individual’s insomnia progresses to a chronic stage. The individual is maintained on dialysis until being matched for KTX. Following suc- cessful transplantation, their kidney functioning returns to a level that does not require dialysis. However, the individual

Figure 1—The 3Ps Model of the development of disturbed sleep in end-stage renal disease.

Predisposing factors include age, gender, and medical comorbidity. Precipitating factors include fatigue, mood, and quality of life. Perpetuating factors include napping and caffeine consumption.

D ow

nl oa

de d

fr om

j cs

m .a

as m

.o rg

b y

69 .2

46 .1

61 .7

7 on

A pr

il 2

1, 2

02 0.

F or

p er

so na

l us

e on

ly . N

o ot

he r

us es

w it

ho ut

p er

m is

si on

. C

op yr

ig ht

2 02

0 A

m er

ic an

A ca

de m

y of

S le

ep M

ed ic

in e.

A ll

r ig

ht s

re se

rv ed

.

249 Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2016

JM Williams, CS McCrae, JR Rodrigue et al. Biopsychosocial Research of Sleep before and after Kidney Transplantation

continues to experience insomnia due to their compensatory perpetuating behaviors.

Much of the existing research on sleep disturbance in the context of ESRD and KTX has utilized a single method of measurement involving participants’ retrospective recall of their sleep over a designated period of 30 or more days. Given the highly variable nature of sleep and the potential for bias in retrospective recall, more accurate characterization of sleep disorders in these patients calls for research using prospective assessment. As a result, this study is the first to allow for true differential diagnosis of sleep disorders in pre- and post-KTX patients. Second, it is the first to take a theoretical approach to studying the impact of biopsychosocial factors (age, sex, medical comorbidity, fatigue, mood, quality of life (QOL), stimulant consumption, napping) on sleep in pre- and post- KTX patients. These factors were chosen for inclusion, be- cause: (1) previous research has shown they share observable relationships with sleep, ESRD, and KTX; and (2) according to Spielman’s model of insomnia,19 these factors represent the predisposing, precipitating, and perpetuating factors that may contribute to the development and maintenance of chronic insomnia. It is hypothesized that these factors will have a differential impact with predisposing and precipitating fac- tors having a greater impact on the sleep of pre-KTX patients and perpetuating factors having greater impact for post-KTX patients.

M E T H O D S

Participants The current study included a sample of adults who were on the waiting list for a KTX (N = 25) and those that had received a KTX (N = 30) at the University of Florida (UF) Transplant Center and Nephrology Clinic. Of the 314 participants initially approached about the study, 17.5% of the participants agreed to participate. The most frequent reasons for declining partici- pation were research site being too far (11%), insufficient time to participate (14%), not interested in volunteering (48%), and poor health (4%). For the pre-KTX group, participants were (1) referred for kidney or kidney/pancreas transplant and (2) had chronic kidney disease stages 3, 4, or 5. Among post-KTX, participants had (1) received a kidney or kidney/pancreas transplant, (2) were more than 3 months post-KTX, (3) had a stable allograft with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥ 40 mL/ min, and (4) were > 12 weeks after the treatment of any acute rejection of the graft.

Procedures Recruitment occurred during routine visits to the UF Trans- plant Clinic. Patients were approached first by a member of the Transplant Clinic staff. If individuals were interested in par- ticipating, they were given additional information by a trained research assistant. Potential participants were asked to provide consent in a private examination room in the UF Sleep Re- search Lab. Potential participants were given the opportunity to read and sign the consent form during scheduled visits, or to take the informed consent form home to consult with family

and friends before providing consent. The study protocol was evaluated and approved by the UF Health Science Center Insti- tutional Review Board.

Once informed consent was obtained, a graduate research assistant or trained research assistant conducted a semi-struc- tured clinical interview. Criteria were employed to rule out severe, uncontrolled psychopathology (i.e., suicidal ideation/ intent, bipolar disorder, psychotic disorders, and dementia). In addition, measures of depression (Beck Depression Inven- tory-2) and anxiety (State Trait Anxiety Inventory) were ad- ministered.24,25 The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to screen for severe global impairment with exclusion criteria including scores < 23 for individuals with a 9th grade education level or higher or < 17 for those with less than a 9th grade level education.26 Participants were administered the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form to measure par- ticipants’ perspective on their current functional health and well-being.27

Participants who qualified completed multiple sleep mea- sures over a 2-week period. Ambulatory polysomnographic monitoring (PSG; Grass Technologies) was conducted in each participant’s home for one night during the 2-week assessment period to screen for physiological sleep disorders (e.g., apnea). In addition, participants completed two weeks of sleep dair- ies in order to confirm the diagnosis of insomnia. These sleep measures have been recommended as standard assessments in sleep research.28 Appropriate clinical referrals were provided to participants with clinically significant sleep problems. Par- ticipants were compensated $50 for participation.

Measures Demographics and Health Survey This survey consists of 13 items collecting information on de- mographics (age, sex, race, education, work status, height, and weight), sleep disorder symptoms, symptoms due to kidney dis- ease, current medications, and other health information. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the following formula: (weight in pounds / [height in inches × height in inches]) × 703. Participants were asked to report comorbid medical conditions including heart attack, other heart problems, cancer, AIDS, hy- pertension, neurological disorder (seizures, Parkinson disease), breathing disorders (asthma, emphysema, allergies), urinary problems (prostate problems), diabetes, pains (arthritis, back pain, migraines), gastrointestinal disorders (stomach, irritable bowels, ulcers, gastric reflux), and other medical conditions. From these endorsements, a total number of comorbid condi- tions reported was calculated.

Subjective Sleep Measure Sleep diaries were completed each morning for 14 days and provided subjective estimates of commonly reported sleep- wake variables: (1) sleep onset latency (time from initial lights out until sleep onset; SOL); (2) wake time after sleep onset (time spent awake after initial sleep onset until last awakening; WASO); and (3) total sleep time (computed by subtracting total wake time from the time spent in bed; TST). In the current study, SOL and WASO were combined to create a composite Do

w nl

oa de

d fr

om j

cs m

.a as

m .o

rg b

y 69

.2 46

.1 61

.7 7

on A

pr il

2 1,

2 02

0. F

or p

er so

na l

us e

on ly

. N o

ot he

r us

es w

it ho

ut p

er m

is si

on .

C op

yr ig

ht 2

02 0

A m

er ic

an A

ca de

m y

of S

le ep

M ed

ic in

e. A

ll r

ig ht

s re

se rv

ed .

250Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2016

JM Williams, CS McCrae, JR Rodrigue et al. Biopsychosocial Research of Sleep before and after Kidney Transplantation

measure of total wake time (TWT). Sleep diaries have been found to provide a reliable and valid index of insomnia symp- toms and are essential in insomnia assessment.28

Sleep Related Compensatory Behaviors Daily dairies were used to measure daily behavior known to be disruptive to night time sleep including napping (total number of minutes per day), and caffeine consumption (ounces of caf- feinated beverages consumed per day). Average values of nap- ping and caffeine consumption were used in the present study.

Physiological Sleep Measure (PSG) The 25 Channel AURA Recording System (Grass Technolo- gies) was used to conduct in-home overnight sleep monitor- ing, consisting of 6 electroencephalography (EEG) measures, 2 electrooculography, and chin electromyography (EMG) ac- cording to standard placements.29 Other channels included ox- ygen saturation level, bilateral anterior tibialis EMG, heart rate, thoracic strain gauge, and a nasal/oral thermistor. A single night of PSG was collected during the 2 weeks of assessment. Procedures for PSG training, data management, and scoring were based on the published procedures of the Sleep Heart Health Study.29 All studies were scored by a graduate research assistant trained in PSG scoring up to a 0.8 concordance rate with PSG technicians based on recommended scoring criteria for staging sleep and identifying sleep disorders.30

Criteria for Diagnosing Sleep Disorders Chronic Insomnia Individuals were identified as having chronic insomnia based on self-reported sleep over two weeks based on a SOL or WASO > 30 min, a frequency ≥ 6 times over the two weeks, and lasting > 6 months.28 In addition, individuals must report significant distress and daytime impairments related to their sleep problem. These criteria are consistent with research31 and DSM-IV criteria for the diagnosis of insomnia.32

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Obstructive sleep apnea was diagnosed according to research and clinical recommendations.29,33 A diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea consists of both apneic (a complete cessation of airflow) and hypopneic (a decrease in airflow volume) events. Cessations of breathing occur with EEG-measured arousals and decreases in oxygen saturation ≥ 3%. In order for hy- popneic events to be considered clinically meaningful, EEG- measured arousals must be associated with ≥ 30% reduction in airflow and 4% oxygen desaturation or 50% reduction in air- flow and 3% oxygen desaturation. The number of these events per hour was calculated, and individuals having an apnea- hypopnea index (AHI) > 10 events per hour were considered positive for sleep apnea.

Restless Legs Syndrome In accordance with NIH and research recommended diag- nostic criteria, RLS was identified through report of (1) feel- ings of creeping, crawling sensations that result in the urge to move the limbs and (2) occur before bed or when at rest.10

Additionally, the participant had to report (3) relief of these sensations with movement and (4) a greater intensity of these sensations before bedtime and improvement in the morning. Individuals needed to report all 4 symptoms in order to estab- lish the presence of RLS.

Quality of Life Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form (KDQOL) was used to collect data on domains of QOL. The KDQOL is a brief measure of physical and psychosocial functioning, both generally and specific to kidney disease,27 with higher values reflecting better QOL. This measure also includes the items on the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).34 The KDQOL and SF- 36 show good psychometric properties, and overall, the scale have been found to be significantly related to other questions about perceived health status, number of days in the hospital, disability days, and overall health.27

Fatigue Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form is an empirically developed measure of clinical fatigue which includes 30 items that load onto 5 fatigue factors (general, physical, mental, emotional, and vigor), with higher scores in- dicating greater fatigue and has been found to be valid and reliable (> 0.85).35 A single total fatigue score provided by the measure was used as an estimate of fatigue.

Mood Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) and State- Trait Anxiety Inventory-State Form (STAI-Y) were used to assess current mood status at the end of the assessment period.24,25 The BDI-II has been found to have adequate psychometric properties among young and older adults and discriminate validity in sepa- rating depressed and non-depressed individuals.36 The STAI-Y has been found to be correlated with other measures of anxiety and good internal consistency.25 In the interest of parsimony and based on prior research, in the current study, the 2 measures (BDI- II and STAI) were treated as measures of negative mood and were combined into one variable in final analyses by converting mea- sure scores into Z scores and combining them.37

Statistical Analyses Collected data were entered into IBM SPSS v20.0 statistical analysis software and standard screening procedures were used to identify missing or incomplete data. Data were assessed for normality to ensure that statistical assumptions were met within limits that allow for testing of the specified hypotheses.

In order to test the impact of group (pre- versus post-KTX) on continuous variables, including demographic and medical fac- tors, TWT, TST, comorbidty, fatigue, mood, QOL, napping, and caffeine consumption, multiple ANOVAs were run. Categori- cal demographic variables were analyzed using χ2 tests. Demo- graphic and medical variables of interest included age, sex, race, education, BMI, comorbidities, and number of current medica- tions. To test the fit for the Spielman 3P Model of chronic in- somnia separate hierarchical regressions for pre-KTX and for post-KTX were used to estimate the mean relationship between TWT and TST as predicted by age, sex, comorbidity, QOL, Do

w nl

oa de

d fr

om j

cs m

.a as

m .o

rg b

y 69

.2 46

.1 61

.7 7

on A

pr il

2 1,

2 02

0. F

or p

er so

na l

us e

on ly

. N o

ot he

r us

es w

it ho

ut p

er m

is si

on .

C op

yr ig

ht 2

02 0

A m

er ic

an A

ca de

m y

of S

le ep

M ed

ic in

e. A

ll r

ig ht

s re

se rv

ed .

251 Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2016

JM Williams, CS McCrae, JR Rodrigue et al. Biopsychosocial Research of Sleep before and after Kidney Transplantation

fatigue, mood, napping, and caffeine consumption. In the first block of these models, age, sex, and comorbidity were loaded. In the second block, the QOL, fatigue, and mood were included. In the third block, napping, and caffeine consumption were in- cluded. Significant factors from the models computed for pre- KTX and post-KTX were directly compared to determine the relative importance of predictors in estimating TST and TWT for the 2 groups. This comparison was completed by convert- ing the derived β-weights for each predictor into semi-partial correlations, which were then converted into z-scores and were compared using a Fischer Z score transformation.

R E S U LT S

The total sample consisted of 25 pre-KTX and 30 post-KTX patients. Table 1 provides a summary of demographic and

health characteristics of the 2 groups. The total sample was 56% female and had a mean age of 53.7 years (SD = 13.1). The median time since kidney transpant for the post-KTX group was 74 months (ranging from 6 to 322 months). In this sample, 5 pre-KTX and 6 post-KTX participants reported currently using sleeping medication with no significant difference be- tween groups is use of this medication. Seven pre-KTX par- ticipants and 28 post-KTX participants reported currently using immunosuppressant medication. Pre-KTX and post- KTX participants were compared on demographic and medi- cal variables and no significant group differences were found (Table 1). There were trends toward greater TWT and lower QOL among pre-KTX patients (Table 2). There were no sig- nificant group differences on the other sleep related continu- ous variables. Comparing rates of apnea, RLS, and insomnia between the two groups found that pre-KTX patients had a trend toward higher prevalence of RLS symptoms compared

Table 1—Mean demographic and health variables by kidney transplant group. Pre-Kidney Transplant

(n = 25) Post-Kidney

Transplant (n = 30) df Test Statistic p Age, mean (SD) 51.75 (13.73) 55.37 (12.51) 54 F = 1.02 0.39 Education, years, mean (SD) 13.63 (2.16) 14.47 (2.99) 54 F = 1.08 0.30 BMI, mean (SD) 29.36 (6.21) 30.69 (5.82) 54 F = 0.67 0.42 Race and ethnicity, % 3 χ2 = 3.15 0.37

Caucasian 48% 63.3% African American 36% 23.3% Hispanic or Latino 16% 10.1% Asian American 0% 3.3%

Sex, % 64% Female 50% Female 1 χ2 = 1.09 0.41 Number of comorbid medical conditions, mean (SD) 3.28 (1.28) 3.83 (1.76) 54 F = 1.71 0.20 Number of current medications, mean (SD) 10.04 (4.92) 11.87 (5.35) 54 F = 1.66 0.20

Numbers represent mean values or percentages. SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index, calculated using the formula: (weight in pounds / [height in inches × height in inches]) × 703.

Table 2—Mean outcome variables by kidney transplant group. Pre-Kidney Transplant

(n = 25) Post-Kidney

Transplant (n = 30) df Test Statistic p TST, minutes, mean (SD) 469.65 (75.36) 444.91 (66.66) 53 F = 1.64 0.21

Male 462.72 (82.13) 432.16 (57.06) Female 473.56 (73.79) 458.57 (75.02)

TWT, minutes, mean (SD) 64.28 (38.98) 47.36 (34.19) 53 F = 2.51 0.09 Male 29.21 (16.92) 44.90 (34.94) Female 84.02 (33.54) 50.01 (34.49)

Total fatigue, score, mean (SD) 16.65 (18.14) 16.14 (22.33) 52 F = 0.01 0.96 Negative mood, z-score, mean (SD) −0.08 (0.72) −0.01 (.95) 51 F = 0.41 0.52 QOL, score, mean (SD) 34.03 (10.63) 39.89 (11.65) 53 F = 3.41 0.07 Caffiene, servings, mean (SD) 1.07 (1.40) 1.78 (1.79) 53 F = 2.53 0.12 Napping, minutes, mean (SD) 30.15 (21.82) 26.42 (27.18) 53 F = 0.30 0.59 Sleep apnea, % 32.00% 33.33% 1 χ2 = 0.01 0.92 RLS, % 32.00% 13.30% 1 χ2 = 2.79 0.09 Insomnia, % 68.00% 48.30% 1 χ2 = 2.14 0.14

Numbers represent mean values or percentages. SD, standard deviation; TST, total sleep time; TWT, total wake time; QOL, quality of life; RLS, restless legs syndrome.

D ow

nl oa

de d

fr om

j cs

m .a

as m

.o rg

b y

69 .2

46 .1

61 .7

7 on

A pr

il 2

1, 2

02 0.

F or

p er

so na

l us

e on

ly . N

o ot

he r

us es

w it

ho ut

p er

m is

si on

. C

op yr

ig ht

2 02

0 A

m er

ic an

A ca

de m

y of

S le

ep M

ed ic

in e.

A ll

r ig

ht s

re se

rv ed

.

252Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2016

JM Williams, CS McCrae, JR Rodrigue et al. Biopsychosocial Research of Sleep before and after Kidney Transplantation

to post-KTX patients (Table 2). Average sleep onset latency (pre-KTX = 33.1 min and post-KTX = 28.5 min) and wake af- ter sleep onset (pre-KTX = 20.9 min and post-KTX = 20.1 min) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. There were no significant group differences in the prevalence of insomnia or obstructive sleep apnea.

Regression Analysis of the 3P Model A summary of the final models calculated for pre-KTX par- ticipants can be seen in Table 3, and a summary of the final models calculated for post-KTX can be seen in Table 4.

The final model predicting TWT among pre-KTX partici- pants was significant, with female sex shown to be a signifi- cant individual predictor and greater negative mood trending towards significant prediction of increased TWT, R2 = 0.67, F8,17 = 3.23, p < 0.05. Table 3 summarizes the regression pre- dicting TWT among pre-KTX participants and Table 5 shows the model building steps. The final model for TWT among post-transplant participants was trending towards significance,

R2 = 0.49, F8,20 = 2.29, p = 0.07. Inspection of the individual predictors showed that greater mean napping was trending to- wards prediction of greater TWT. The next largest predictors of increased TWT were greater negative mood and less fatigue. Table 4 shows the regression results among post-KTX partici- pants and Table 6 shows the model building steps. The effects of sex from the pre- and post-KTX models were directly com- pared using the Fisher r-to-z transformation which revealed that sex was a significantly different predictor of TWT (z = 2.01, p < 0.05) among pre-KTX participants (r = 0.58) as compared to post-KTX participants (r = 0.08). Female sex was moderately related to increased TWT among pre-KTX participants and had very small positive relationship with TWT among post-KTX.

Among pre-KTX patients, the final model for TST was not statistically significant (Table 3), and there were no significant individual predictors of TST. The largest relative relationships were less TST being related to more medical problems, male sex, and more negative mood. The results for this model can be seen in Table 3 and model building steps can be seen in Table 5.

Table 3—Hierarchical regression predicting total wake time and total sleep time for pre-kidney transplant patients. Total Wake Time Total Sleep Time

B SE β t r p B SE β t r p Block 1 Predisposing

Constant −75.25 46.47 −1.62 0.14 492.75 158.72 3.11 0.01 Age 0.73 0.42 0.30 1.72 0.28 0.11 −0.19 1.44 −0.04 0.13 −0.03 0.90 Sex 50.48 13.98 0.74 3.61 0.58 0.00 35.16 47.73 0.24 0.73 0.18 0.48 Comorbidity −3.76 5.86 −0.15 −0.64 −0.10 0.53 −14.08 20.04 −0.26 −0.70 −0.18 0.50

Block 2 Precipitating QOL 0.51 0.70 0.16 0.73 0.12 0.48 −1.16 2.4 −0.17 −0.48 −0.12 0.64 Fatigue 0.16 0.63 0.07 0.26 0.04 0.79 −0.24 2.15 −0.05 −0.11 −0.03 0.91 Mood 19.82 10.40 0.35 1.9 0.31 0.07 −30.56 35.55 −0.25 −0.86 −0.22 0.69

Block 3 Perpetuating Caffeine −0.08 4.35 −0.01 −0.02 0.00 0.99 9.45 14.86 0.19 0.64 0.16 0.54 Napping 0.31 0.36 0.21 0.86 0.14 0.40 0.31 1.21 0.10 0.25 0.06 0.81

For the final total wake time model R 2 = 0.67, p < 0.05. For the final total sleep time model R 2 = 0.15, p = 0.95. QOL, quality of life.

Table 4—Hierarchical regression predicting total wake time and total sleep time for post-kidney transplant patients. Total Wake Time Total Sleep Time

B SE β t r p B SE β t r p Block 1 Predisposing

Constant 65.12 51.73 1.26 0.16 214.55 114.14 1.88 0.16 Age 0.26 0.49 0.09 0.53 0.09 0.60 −0.19 1.09 −0.04 −0.18 −0.03 0.86 Sex 6.06 12.31 0.09 0.49 0.08 0.63 45.94 27.17 0.35 1.69 0.31 0.11 Comorbidity −1.04 3.79 −0.05 −0.28 −0.05 0.79 0.87 8.37 0.02 0.10 0.02 0.92

Block 2 Precipitating QOL −1.06 0.71 −0.36 −1.49 −0.24 0.15 3.63 1.58 0.64 2.31 0.43 0.03 Fatigue −0.96 0.58 −0.35 −1.65 −0.27 0.12 2.17 1.29 0.40 1.68 0.31 0.11 Mood 12.66 7.64 0.35 1.66 0.27 0.02 22.88 16.86 0.32 1.36 0.25 0.45

Block 3 Perpetuating Caffeine −3.08 3.19 −0.16 −0.96 −0.16 0.35 11.64 7.06 0.31 1.65 0.31 0.12 Napping 0.44 0.24 0.35 1.8 0.30 0.09 0.15 0.53 0.06 0.07 0.05 0.78

For the final total wake time model, R 2 = 0.49, p = 0.07. For the final total sleep time model, R 2 = 0.35, p = 0.31. QOL, quality of life.

D ow

nl oa

de d

fr om

j cs

m .a

as m

.o rg

b y

69 .2

46 .1

61 .7

7 on

A pr

il 2

1, 2

02 0.

F or

p er

so na

l us

e on

ly . N

o ot

he r

us es

w it

ho ut

p er

m is

si on

. C

op yr

ig ht

2 02

0 A

m er

ic an

A ca

de m

y of

S le

ep M

ed ic

in e.

A ll

r ig

ht s

re se

rv ed

.

253 Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2016

JM Williams, CS McCrae, JR Rodrigue et al. Biopsychosocial Research of Sleep before and after Kidney Transplantation

Among post-KTX patients, the final model for TST was not sta- tistically significant (Table 4), but there was a significant posi- tive relationship between QOL and TST such that lower QOL was related to less TST. The next largest predictors of less TST were male sex, less general fatigue, less average amount of caf- feine consumed, and less negative mood. The model building steps for TST among post-KTX can be seen in Table 6.

D I S C U S S I O N

Review of Findings These results support the findings of previous research, that rates of RLS are lower among patients after receiving kidney transplantation, while the rates of sleep apnea and insomnia ap- pear to be the same among the pre and post transplant groups.2–6 The occurrence of insomnia and RLS among post-KTX pa- tients remain considerably higher than rates observed in indi- viduals of the same age in the general population.7 Furthermore, while not statistically significant, pre-KTX participants were reporting longer total wake time on average, suggesting that the disturbance to pre-transplant patients’ sleep may be larger in magnitude relative to post-KTX. Although nonsignificant

in the current study, the results none the less support previous findings that pre-KTX individuals experience lower quality of life as compared to post-KTX individuals. The results did not show an overall difference between the groups on the amount of fatigue or mood disturbance. The lack of a finding of in- creased fatigue among pre-KTX patients is somewhat surpris- ing when compared to previous research but may be partially explained by pre-transplant participants in this study sleeping more on average.23 Alternatively, it is possible that a secondary factor, such as reduced social or occupational demands due to compromised health, reduced the amount of fatigue reported.

The observed rates of ongoing sleep disorders indicate that such disorders may be undertreated among both pre- and post- KTX patients. Given the serious medical symptoms these patients manage on a daily basis, including high blood pres- sure, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, anemia, and electrolyte imbalances, the impact of disturbed sleep may be overlooked by medical providers. However, sleep symptoms do cause sig- nificant distress.1 Patients with an extensive list of daily medi- cations would be understandably reluctant to add additional medication for the treatment of sleep symptoms. Cognitive behavioral treatments for sleep disorders, particularly cogni- tive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTi), may be a safe and

Table 5—Model steps in hierarchical regression predicting total wake time and total sleep time for pre-kidney transplant patients.

Total Wake Time R 2 df 1 df 2 F for model p for model F for change in R 2 p for change in R 2

Model 1: Predisposing 0.52 3 22 6.48 0.00 Model 2: Predisposing and Precipitating 0.65 6 19 4.56 0.00 1.78 0.19 Model 3: Predisposing, Precipitating, and Perpetuating 0.67 8 17 3.23 0.03 0.38 0.69

Total Sleep Time R 2 df 1 df 2 F for model p for model F for change in R 2 p for change in R 2

Model 1 :Predisposing 0.07 3 22 0.46 0.72 Model 2: Predisposing and Precipitating 0.12 6 19 0.34 0.91 0.28 0.84 Model 3: Predisposing, Precipitating, and Perpetuating 0.15 8 17 0.30 0.95 0.27 0.77

Predisposing factors include age, sex, and medical comorbidity; precipitating factors include quality of life, fatigue and mood; perpetuating factors include caffeine consumption and napping.

Table 6—Model steps in hierarchical regression predicting total wake time and total sleep time for post-kidney transplant patients.

Total Wake Time R 2 df 1 df 2 F for model p for model F for change in R 2 p for change in R 2

Model 1: Predisposing 0.07 3 25 0.57 0.64 Model 2: Predisposing and Precipitating 0.37 6 22 2.05 0.10 3.36 0.04 Model 3: Predisposing, Precipitating, and Perpetuating 0.49 8 20 2.29 0.07 2.29 0.13

Total Sleep Time R 2 df 1 df 2 F for model p for model F for change in R 2 p for change in R 2

Model 1: Predisposing 0.06 3 25 0.48 0.70 Model 2: Predisposing and Precipitating 0.26 6 22 1.21 0.34 1.89 0.16 Model 3: Predisposing, Precipitating, and Perpetuating 0.35 8 20 1.28 0.31 1.37 0.28

Predisposing factors include age, sex, and medical comorbidity; precipitating factors include quality of life, fatigue and mood; perpetuating factors include caffeine consumption and napping.

D ow

nl oa

de d

fr om

j cs

m .a

as m

.o rg

b y

69 .2

46 .1

61 .7

7 on

A pr

il 2

1, 2

02 0.

F or

p er

so na

l us

e on

ly . N

o ot

he r

us es

w it

ho ut

p er

m is

si on

. C

op yr

ig ht

2 02

0 A

m er

ic an

A ca

de m

y of

S le

ep M

ed ic

in e.

A ll

r ig

ht s

re se

rv ed

.

254Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2016

JM Williams, CS McCrae, JR Rodrigue et al. Biopsychosocial Research of Sleep before and after Kidney Transplantation

effective treatment for these symptoms (while not adding sig- nificantly to the patient’s medication regimen). CBTi has been found to be efficacious among numerous groups of medically ill individuals, including cancer and chronic pain patients, who have comparably intensive medical regimen and complications. Additionally, there are a small number of studies which have investigated CBTi among kidney dialysis patients and found significant improvements.21,38–41 However, one of the primary limitations of CBTi is the relatively limited number of provid- ers who are trained to provide this intervention and the result- ing limited accessibility of this treatment for many patients.

Unique patterns of biopsychosocial factors in sleep distur- bance were observed among pre- and post-KTX patients. The prediction of total wake time using biopsychosocial factors was significant among pre-KTX participants and was approaching significance among post-KTX. This suggests that the biopsy- chosocial factors observed in this study are meaningful pre- dictors of the amount of time spent awake in the night. The attempt to predict total sleep time was not successful for either group. Despite this, some observations can be made regard- ing the individual factors and the implications of these factors within the Spielman 3Ps model of insomnia.

Among pre-KTX patients, the best predictors of sleep dis- turbance were those classified as predisposing factors (i.e., sex) and precipitating (i.e., mood) factors of insomnia. If interpreted within the context of the 3Ps model, this would suggest that more of these individuals are earlier in the process of the de- velopment of insomnia and perpetuating factors have not yet assumed a maintenance role. The relationship between female sex and increased time awake in the night is consistent with prior research indicating that women are more likely to report insomnia symptoms.7 However, the relative strength of this rela- tionship among pre-KTX patients suggests that end-stage renal disease may have a particularly deleterious effect on the sleep of women. Alternatively, it may be that men have a response bias to under-report sleep problems. There are documented sex dif- ferences in the selection of dialysis type, with men more often using in-clinic hemodialysis and women more often using in- home peritoneal dialysis.42 However, neither form of dialysis has been found to be consistently associated with greater insomnia symptoms.43 The positive relationship between mood and to- tal wake time suggests that pre-KTX participants experienced greater insomnia symptoms concurrent with worse mood and is consistent with previous research.13,14,23 This relationship may be the result of worse sleep resulting in greater mood disturbance, worse mood impairing sleep or a third factor impacting both mood and sleep. While the relationship between these two fac- tors was clearly present, further research is needed to determine the causal relationship.12–14 Interestingly, the factors explored in this study had relatively little relationship with total sleep time and it remains uncertain which factors are related to time spent sleeping. Other areas for exploration may be more biologically/ medically based factors such as dialysis frequency, creatinine levels, and hormones such as cortisol, all of which may impact the timing of the circadian rhythm system. In addition, social factors such as work and family responsibilities may change during a patient’s illness resulting in reduced social pressure to adhere to traditional sleep patterns and further disrupting sleep.

Among post-KTX participants, there was evidence that pre- cipitating and perpetuating factors affected sleep. The largest predictor of time awake in the night among post-KTX partici- pants was worse mood. As with the pre-KTX participants, it is not possible to determine the direction of this relationship, but these results emphasize the importance of further research into the interactions between mood and sleep among kidney disease patients. The trending relationship between increased napping and increased total wake time suggests that patients’ daytime behaviors may be related to insomnia among post-KTX patients. If conceptualized within the 3-P model, this result would sug- gest that increased napping would maintain difficulty falling asleep and staying sleep as a result of disruption of the natural sleep need that builds across a day. Indeed, there is evidence that napping increases while patients are receiving dialysis.20 This behavior change may continue after transplantation, be- coming a perpetuating factor of insomnia and may be a fruitful area for intervention in the treatment of insomnia. The relation- ship between perceived reduced quality of life and decreased total sleep time suggests that perceptions of impaired physical health are interrelated with reduced amounts of sleep. This re- lationship may be mediated through a psychological factor such as rumination about health and sleep or a physiological variable, such as increased pain, and warrants further investigation. Also of note, among post-KTX participants, precipitating factors ex- plored all had small to moderate effects sizes for total wake time and total sleep time. With a larger sample it is possible these factors would have been significant. When taken collectively, the results among post-KTX patients offer evidence of numer- ous psychological factors related to insomnia, and these factors have been previously identified as predisposing and perpetuat- ing factors of insomnia.19 Intervention on these psychological factors may be critical for improvement of insomnia symptoms in this population. The evidence-based treatment, CBTi, spe- cifically addresses perpetuating psychological factors through systematic strategies for changing napping habits, caffeine con- sumption, managing nighttime rumination, and creating a more structured sleep schedule.

It should be noted that while the attempts to explain total wake time for each group were successful, the attempts to ex- plain total sleep time for each group were not. It appears that the biopsychosocial factors chosen in this study are better predic- tors of wake time in the night. Despite a number of the biopsy- chosocial factors used to predict total wake time and total sleep time not being significant for the pre- and post-KTX groups, a few observations can be made regarding the relative strength and direction of these relationships. These results suggest that women were more likely to report spending time awake during the night prior to transplantation as compared to women who were assessed after transplantation. This difference may be re- lated to the relatively early stage of insomnia among these pa- tients. Consistent with past research and the hypotheses of this paper, it appears that pre-transplant patients are still experienc- ing greater impact from predisposing factors such as female sex.

Implications for Clinical Practice This study specifically investigated the relative impact of vari- ous factors in disturbed sleep. Behavior such as napping has Do

w nl

oa de

d fr

om j

cs m

.a as

m .o

rg b

y 69

.2 46

.1 61

.7 7

on A

pr il

2 1,

2 02

0. F

or p

er so

na l

us e

on ly

. N o

ot he

r us

es w

it ho

ut p

er m

is si

on .

C op

yr ig

ht 2

02 0

A m

er ic

an A

ca de

m y

of S

le ep

M ed

ic in

e. A

ll r

ig ht

s re

se rv

ed .

255 Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2016

JM Williams, CS McCrae, JR Rodrigue et al. Biopsychosocial Research of Sleep before and after Kidney Transplantation

been suggested as a factor in the maintenance of sleep distur- bance in this population.20 These sleep related behaviors are specifically targeted when using CBTi and the current results, along with previous studies investigating cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia among dialysis patients, suggest that such treatment may be a viable treatment option for both di- alysis and transplant patients.21,41 However, it is also important to note that within the current study there were group-specific differences in the impact of quality of life, and sex.

Among pre-KTX patients, women and patients with more depression or anxiety were found to have more disrupted sleep. By comparison, among post-KTX patients, patients with lower quality of life and increased napping were found to have the most disrupted sleep. These results suggest that a nuanced ap- proach to the treatment of sleep disorders is warranted when treating unique populations. In the treatment of sleep distur- bance among pre- and post-KTX patients, clinicians should use measurement tools and history-taking to assess if other factors such as depression and anxiety, compromised health, or napping are relevant contributing factors to the patient’s sleep disturbance and treatment plans should be developed which specifically target these relationships.

Limitations There are limitations to the current study which should be noted. The current study relied on voluntary participation, with a relatively low proportion of the approached patients agreeing to participate (17.5%), and consequently this study may not be representative of pre- and post-KTX patients more generally. However, demographic factors and rates of sleep disorders, in- cluding insomnia are consistent with those observed in previ- ous research and do not suggest an oversampling of a particular group of patients.23 In addition, the limited sample size of this study limits generalizability of these findings to other samples. While these results suggest links among female sex, napping, quality of life, and negative mood to disturbed sleep, these re- lationships are correlational, and causal conclusions cannot be drawn from this study. However, these results do provide a rationale to further explore these relationships. While many of the factors explored in this study were not statistically sig- nificant, the patterns observed may provide direction for fu- ture research focusing on the impact of behavioral and other psychological factors on insomnia and these results illustrate the importance of a nuanced understanding of the biopsycho- social factors involved in insomnia development and mainte- nance. While biological markers of kidney functioning were not included in the estimates of sleep disturbance, implicit in the groupings of pre- and post-transplant status are physiologi- cal differences in kidney functioning. Thus, not including this type of factor is not seen a major limitation of the current study.

Future Directions More research and resources focusing on the impact of sleep dis- turbance and fatigue among chronic kidney disease patients are needed. These patients experience significant impairments in various domains of life related to their disease, including quality of life, fatigue, and particularly sleep. For sleep treatments to become more available, it is important for additional advocacy

and research to be conducted to increase awareness of patients’ sleep problems among health care providers and encourage pa- tients to voice concerns regarding these symptoms. The similar rates of sleep apnea observed in the two groups demonstrate the importance of continuing to assess for and treat these symptoms across the course of kidney disease. The assessment and treat- ment of apnea and insomnia symptoms among chronic kidney disease patients has the potential to improve overall patient outcomes by reducing the overlap of symptoms and resulting improved diagnosis and treatment. Untreated sleep symptoms among chronic kidney disease patients may increase the diffi- culty in determining the cause of other symptoms. For example, fatigue could be an indication of a change in kidney functioning and necessitate medical intervention or fatigue may be related to poor nighttime sleep or a dysregulation of the circadian rhythm. By addressing the factors involved in the patient’s sleep distur- bance and fatigue, the medical professional can more accurately determine if the cause of the fatigue is due to the effects of kid- ney disease and can provide more effective treatment.

In order to gain greater insight into the psychological factors involved in sleep disturbances among kidney disease patients, there is a critical need for true experimental manipulation of these factors. The use of evidence-based treatments such as CBTi in an experimental study with intervention and control conditions allows for direct testing of the implications of the current study and examination of treatment mechanisms. By using an experimental intervention study which specifically intervenes on precipitating and perpetuating factors of insom- nia, it would be possible to determine whether these factors drive insomnia among chronic kidney disease patients.

A B B R E V I AT I O N S

AHI, apnea-hypopnea index BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition BMI, body mass index CBTi, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia EEG, electroencephalography EMG, electromyography ESRD, end-stage renal disease KDQOL, Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form KTX, kidney transplantation MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination PSG, polysomnography QOL, quality of life RLS, restless legs syndrome SOL, sleep onset latency STAI-Y, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State Form TST, total sleep time TWT, total wake time WASO, wake time after sleep onset

R E F E R E N C E S 1. Ramkumar N, Beddhu S, Eggers P, Pappas LM, Cheung AK. Patient

preferences for in-center intense hemodialysis. Hemodial Int 2005;9:281–95.

D ow

nl oa

de d

fr om

j cs

m .a

as m

.o rg

b y

69 .2

46 .1

61 .7

7 on

A pr

il 2

1, 2

02 0.

F or

p er

so na

l us

e on

ly . N

o ot

he r

us es

w it

ho ut

p er

m is

si on

. C

op yr

ig ht

2 02

0 A

m er

ic an

A ca

de m

y of

S le

ep M

ed ic

in e.

A ll

r ig

ht s

re se

rv ed

.

256Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2016

JM Williams, CS McCrae, JR Rodrigue et al. Biopsychosocial Research of Sleep before and after Kidney Transplantation

2. Merlino G, Gigli GL, Valente M. Sleep disturbances in dialysis patients. J Nephrol 2008;21 Suppl 13:S66–70.

3. Merlino G, Piani A, Dolso P, et al. Sleep disorders in patients with end- stage renal disease undergoing dialysis therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:184–190.

4. Phillips B, Young T, Finn L, Asher K, Hening WA, Purvis C. Epidemiology of restless legs symptoms in adults. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2137–41.

5. Perl J, Unruh ML, Chan CT. Sleep disorders in end-stage renal disease: ‘Markers of inadequate dialysis’? Kidney Int 2006;70:1687–93.

6. Unruh ML, Sanders M, Redline S, et al. Sleep apnea in patients on conventional thrice-weekly hemodialysis: comparison with matched controls from the Sleep Heart Health Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17:3503–9.

7. Ohayon MM. Epidemiology of insomnia: what we know and what we still need to learn. Sleep Med Rev 2002;6:97–111.

8. Molnar MZ, Novak M, Mucsi I. Sleep disorders and quality of life in renal transplant recipients. Int Urol Nephrol 2009;41:373–82.

9. United States Renal Data System. USRDS 2010 annual data report: atlas of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2010.

10. Allen RP, Picchietti D, Hening WA, Trenkwalder C, Walters AS, Montplaisir J. Restless legs syndrome: diagnostic criteria, special considerations, and epidemiology. A report from the restless legs syndrome diagnosis and epidemiology workshop at the National Institutes of Health. Sleep Med 2003;4:101–19.

11. Punjabi NM. The epidemiology of adult obstructive sleep apnea. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008;5:136–43.

12. Ford DE, Kamerow DB. Epidemiologic study of sleep disturbances and psychiatric disorders. An opportunity for prevention? JAMA 1989;262:1479–84.

13. Noohi S, Tavallaii SA, Bazzaz A, Khoddami-Vishte HR, Saadat SH. Restlessness and psychomotor agitation after kidney transplantation: their impact on perceived health status. Psychol Health Med 2008;13:249–56.

14. Williams SW, Tell GS, Zheng B, Shumaker S, Rocco MV, Sevick MA. Correlates of sleep behavior among hemodialysis patients. The kidney outcomes prediction and evaluation (KOPE) study. Am J Nephrol 2002;22:18–28.

15. Zammit GK, Weiner J, Damato N, Sillup GP, McMillan CA. Quality of life in people with insomnia. Sleep 1999;22 Suppl 2:S379–85.

16. Pham P, Yabu J, Pham P, Wilkinson A. Chapter 53. Renal transplantation. In: Lerma EV, Berns J, Nissenson AR, eds. Current Diagnosis & Treatment: Nephrology & Hypertension. McGraw-Hill, 2008.

17. Fortier-Brochu E, Beaulieu-Bonneau S, Ivers H, Morin CM. Relations between sleep, fatigue, and health-related quality of life in individuals with insomnia. J Psychosom Res 2010;69:475–83.

18. Jhamb M, Weisbord SD, Steel JL, Unruh M. Fatigue in patients receiving maintenance dialysis: a review of definitions, measures, and contributing factors. Am J Kidney Dis 2008;52:353–65.

19. Spielman A. Assessment of insomnia. Clin Psychol Rev 1986;6:11–25. 20. Yngman-Uhlin P, Friedrichsen M, Gustavsson M, Fernstrom A, Edell-

Gustafsson U. Circling around in tiredness: perspectives of patients on peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Nurs J 2010;37:407–13.

21. Chen HY, Chiang CK, Wang HH, et al. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for sleep disturbance in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2008;52:314–23.

22. Rodrigue JR, Mandelbrot DA, Hanto DW, Johnson SR, Karp SJ, Pavlakis M. A cross-sectional study of fatigue and sleep quality before and after kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant 2010;25:E13–21.

23. Holley JL, Nespor S, Rault R. A comparison of reported sleep disorders in patients on chronic hemodialysis and continuous peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1992;19:156–61.

24. Beck A, Steer R, Garbin M. Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, 1996.

25. Spielberger C, Gorsuch R, Lushene R, Vagg P, Jacobs G. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Form Y. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983.

26. Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98.

27. Hays RD, Kallich JD, Mapes DL, Coons SJ, Carter WB. Development of the kidney disease quality of life (KDQOL) instrument. Qual Life Res 1994;3:329–38.

28. Buysse DJ, Ancoli-Israel S, Edinger JD, Lichstein KL, Morin CM. Recommendations for a standard research assessment of insomnia. Sleep 2006;29:1155–73.

29. Redline S, Sanders MH, Lind BK, et al. Methods for obtaining and analyzing unattended polysomnography data for a multicenter study. Sleep Heart Health Research Group. Sleep 1998;21:759–67.

30. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The international classification of sleep disorders: diagnostic and coding manual. 2nd ed. Westchester, IL: American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2005.

31. Lichstein KL, Durrence HH, Taylor DJ, Bush AJ, Riedel BW. Quantitative criteria for insomnia. Behav Res Ther 2003;41:427–45.

32. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th text rev ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.

33. Redline S, Budhiraja R, Kapur V, et al. The scoring of respiratory events in sleep: reliability and validity. J Clin Sleep Med 2007;3:169–200.

34. Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute, 1993.

35. Stein KD, Jacobsen PB, Blanchard CM, Thors C. Further validation of the multidimensional fatigue symptom inventory-short form. J Pain Symptom Manageme 2004;27:14–23.

36. Segal DL, Coolidge FL, Cahill BS, O’Riley AA. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) among community-dwelling older adults. Behav Modif 2008;32:3–20.

37. Watson D, Clark LA. Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychol Bull 1984;96:465–90.

38. Savard J, Simard S, Ivers H, Morin CM. Randomized study on the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia secondary to breast cancer, part I: sleep and psychological effects. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:6083–96.

39. Edinger JD, Wohlgemuth WK, Krystal AD, Rice JR. Behavioral insomnia therapy for fibromyalgia patients: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:2527–35.

40. Vitiello MV, Rybarczyk B, Von Korff M, Stepanski EJ. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia improves sleep and decreases pain in older adults with co-morbid insomnia and osteoarthritis. J Clin Sleep Med 2009;5:355–62.

41. Hou Y, Hu P, Liang Y, Mo Z. Effects of cognitive behavioral therapy on insomnia of maintenance hemodialysis patients. Cell Biochem Biophys 2014;69:531–7.

42. Rioux JP, Bargman JM, Chan CT. Systematic differences among patients initiated on home haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: the fallacy of potential competition. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010;25:2364–7.

43. Sabbatini M, Minale B, Crispo A, et al. Insomnia in maintenance haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002;17:852–6.

S U B M I S S I O N & C O R R E S P O N D E N C E I N F O R M AT I O N Submitted for publication October, 2014 Submitted in final revised form August, 2015 Accepted for publication August, 2015 Address correspondence to: Jacob M. Williams, TIRR Memorial Hermann, 1333 Moursund, Houston, TX 77030; Tel: (713) 797-7576; Email: jacob.williams@ memorialhermann.org

D I S C L O S U R E S TAT E M E N T This was not an industry supported study. The authors have indicated no financial conflicts of interest. This study was conducted at the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

D ow

nl oa

de d

fr om

j cs

m .a

as m

.o rg

b y

69 .2

46 .1

61 .7

7 on

A pr

il 2

1, 2

02 0.

F or

p er

so na

l us

e on

ly . N

o ot

he r

us es

w it

ho ut

p er

m is

si on

. C

op yr

ig ht

2 02

0 A

m er

ic an

A ca

de m

y of

S le

ep M

ed ic

in e.

A ll

r ig

ht s

re se

rv ed

.