need help 4 full pages
Phoenixx
Annotatedbibliography.docxSurname 1
5
Name
Course
Tutor
Date
Annotated Bibliography
“Stronger Gun Control Laws Will Save Lives.” Guns and Crime, edited by Christine Watkins, Green haven Press, 2012. At Issue. Gale in Context: Opposing Viewpoints, link.gale.com/apps/doc/EJ3010015248/OVIC?u=txshracd2557&sid=bookmark-OVIC&xid=2e0338cb. Accessed 8 Apr. 2022. Originally published as “Ten Myths about Gun Violence in America,” LCAV.org, 2009.
In Watkins Christine's article, “Stronger Gun Control Laws Will Save Lives,” she mainly focuses on how implementing effective and strong laws associated with gun control can significantly help to deal with violence and save many lives. It is stated that the United States require more comprehensive, stronger, and effective gun control laws in order to safeguard the public and keep firearms out of the wrong hands. It is believed that the United States has the greatest number of gun deaths, compared to various high-income countries in the world. The author believes that if firearms actually protected them, then the United States would have been the safest place globally since the ownership is very high. Despite many individuals having firearms for protection, research has indicated that guns at home increase the risk of deaths or injuries to any family member. Such guns can be used in accidental shootings, criminal assaults, or suicide attempts.
This article is significant since it comprehensively how executing appropriate rules and regulations can help in saving lives in the United States. It shows that possessing guns does not guarantee people the security they need; instead, it results in other issues such as gun violence. The article will help in the research to determine some of the laws that should be implemented to prevent gun violence and instead enhance the public's safety. I think this article will appropriately connect with the article by Gale since they all focus on the issue of gun control and how to preserve the safety of the public in the United States.
Watkins states, “Although many people own guns for self-protection, studies have repeatedly shown that a gun in the home increases the risk of firearm-related death or injury to a household member.” This implies having firearms at home increases the rates of gun violence, which can be experienced through criminal assault, accidental shooting, and suicide attempts.
“Gun Control.” Gale Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection, Gale, 2022. Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints, blink.gale.com/apps/doc/PC3010999212/OVIC?u=txshracd2557&sid=bookmark-OVIC&xid=6e8d1ce0. Accessed 8 Apr. 2022.
Gale's text “Gun Control” defines gun control as the legislation and regulations that place certain guidelines on the possession of guns by restricting particular types of weapons and determining where they can be carried. Control of guns has continued to be a very controversial subject in the United States that has been associated with various issues like public safety, oversight by the state and federal government, and personal rights. It is stated that gaps in legislation may help individuals who might not otherwise fulfill the legal standards for purchase to acquire guns. For instance, there are some federal laws and states that let juveniles buy long firearms from unlicensed gun dealers that have raised issues concerning child safety.
This text is essential because it outlines the advantages and disadvantages of banning assault weapons. Assault weapons should be banned because the accidental discharge of a gun usually increases the risk of injury, although the discharge of an automatic firearm might cause greater harm. Other people maintain that firearms are necessary for self-defense, although such an act does not need the effectiveness and firepower of automatic guns and high-capacity ammunition magazines. Nevertheless, banning various types of guns might be seen as a violation of the Second Amendment of the constitution, and banning assault weapons by the federal government can have a minimal effect on the number of deaths caused by guns.
Gale maintains, “Many Americans support the right to bear arms but also believe that the government has the right to regulate firearms in the interest of public safety.” This shows that the government should play a crucial role in formulating effective laws and regulations to effectively the restrictions set on the sale and circulation of guns to prevent gun violence.
Newman, Benjamin J., and Todd K. Hartman. “Mass shootings and public support for gun control.” British Journal of Political Science 49.4 (2019): 1527-1553. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science/article/mass-shootings-and-public-support-for-gun-control/8F38356AF4DB22B8B7DF28052234FA09
The article “Mass shootings and public support for gun control” by Newman and Hartman typically looks at the recent mass public shootings that have been experienced in the United States. The constant mass shootings it has raised many questions concerning those tragic events and how they affected public policy. For example, when a young man shot more than twenty-five people in Newtown in the United States in December 2012, there was a deep public debate surrounding the problem of gun violence, which was associated with different things like cultural issues, mental health of attackers and violent video games.
I believe this article is important because it defines the various mass shootings that have been experienced in the United States and how gun control can be achieved in the country. The authors state that gun legislation has become a recurrent problem in American politics which has been influenced by the increased attention from the media and public interest in gun control laws due to mass public shootings.
Newman and Hartman state, “While the attacks at Sandy Hook and other mass public shootings like those in Aurora, Blacksburg, and Littleton make national headlines, there are countless others that receive considerably less attention but are just as devastating to affected communities.” This means that there are several other incidents of attacks and mass shootings that have led to adverse effects, but there are no measures that were taken in order to avoid such incidents from occurring again.
Bauchner, Howard, et al. “Death by gun violence—a public health crisis.” JAMA psychiatry 74.12 (2017): 1195-1196. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/article-abstract/2657419
The article “Death by gun violence” generally focuses on how many deaths associated with gun violence has become a significant public health crisis in the United States. The article looks at the shooting that was experienced in La Vegas, where more than fifty people were killed while thousands of them were left with psychological distress from being present at the scene. The authors maintain that firearms do not make people, their households, and families safer, but instead, they lead to more deaths of their loved ones compared to intruders who might be targeting to cause harm. Research shows that majority of the gun deaths in the United States are suicides.
This article is vital because it looks at various aspects of gun violence, such as the effect of being exposed to gun violence and the connection between gun laws and firearm homicides and suicides. This would help the research by defining the connection between homicide and suicide laws. Moreover, health care providers and other physicians can also do more to try to find out what can be done to prevent mass shootings in different parts of the United States.
