Holacracy
Dazed07
AnnotatedBibliography.docx|
Running head: GUIDED IMAGERY AND PROGRESSIVE MUSCLE RELAXATION
|
2 |
2
Annotated Bibliography
Name
Institution
Date
Holacracy and Organizational Structure
1. Insight, Z. (2022, January 1). Holacracy & Self-organization: About: Zappos Insights. Holacracy & Self-Organization | About | Zappos Insights, from, https://www.zapposinsights.com/about/holacracy
Insight (2022) defined holacracy as a collection of rules and processes, checks and balances, and standards that an organization may utilize to help it become self-managed and self-organized. According to the author, holacracy allows all employees (rather than just management) to innovate, make changes, and have a voice. Zappos has been formally adopting Holacracies since January of 2014, but our experiences with it have remained mostly unknown to the outside world. We will provide insights into our achievements and failures and what we have learned over the years. according to Zappos (2022) "Holacracy is like an operating system for your organization. It is a predefined set of rules and processes, checks and balances, and guidelines that an organization can use to help them become self-managed and self-organized by giving every employee (instead of just management) the power to innovate, make changes and have a voice.”
The research is credible, measurable and valid. The author drew his points from different sources and collectively used them to explain and define holacracy. The findings in the article can be used to make decisions and ensure proper management of resources in an organization.
The article is credible since the sources used are reliable and can be verified. There are different ways through which the credibility of this research can be determined. In this article, the credibility is determined by why the study was conducted and how the different phases of the research were conducted about the objectives to be achieved. Assessing whether the researcher has an interest in specific outcomes will also help determine credibility
Morgan (2021) argues that holacratic organization structure enables the dispersed decision-making while allowing everyone to focus on what they do best. The author further argues that decentralized decision-making does not need a completely new organizational structure to thrive in. It can happen just as readily in a flatter structure that can use part of its current infrastructure. "Sometimes ripping out the engine and starting from scratch isn't always as an option, especially as the car is moving, like most organizations always are" (Morgan, 2015 para 4).
The information contained in this article is reliable and credible because the article was not sponsored by the third party, thus, there was interference with the article goal.
3. Institute, C. F. (2021, February 25). Holacracy. Corporate Finance Institute. Retrieved March 3, 2022, from, https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/strategy/holacracy/
The author argues that holacracy is based on flexibility and independence to benefit the company as a whole. It works because one person may take on many jobs, potentially saving money on recruiting. Employees can gain experience in a larger range of employment responsibilities, strengthen abilities that might otherwise go unutilized, and increase their human capital. Governance is done separately inside each circle, and regulations are written and changed regularly. The operational component focuses on arranging teams to meet the operational demands of the business best and ensuring that each team operates successfully and efficiently. CFI (2015) established that "The term holarchy originated from the book "The Ghost in the Machine," published in 1967 by Arthur Koestler. The term refers to the connection between holons, which are both a part of a whole and a whole itself.”
The author used a large sample size. When the sample is big, just like in this research, the reliability of the results is high. The response rate is also essential as it shows the number of respondents who have provided the researcher with usable responses.
4. Hamel, G., & Bernstein, E. (2016, June 20). Beyond the holacracy hype. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved March 3, 2022, from https://hbr.org/2016/07/beyond-the-holacracy-hype
Hamel & Bernstein (2016) claims that self-organization will become an important tool for businesses of all sizes, but there are serious hurdles in adopting the wholesale strategy. Using self-management across a whole organization to establish what should be done is complex, unpredictable labour that will not pay off in many situations. Medium, a social media firm that recently ditched holacracy, discovered that it was impossible to coordinate activities at scale. According to Hamel & Bernstein (2016) "All organizations must achieve both reliability and adaptability to some degree, but usually one eclipses the other”.
5. DeAngelo, M. (2017, October 4). The HOLACRACY experiment in Washington Government. Medium. Retrieved March 3, 2022, from https://medium.com/@deangelo/the-holacracy-experiment-in-washington-government-628c17a5a5e
DeAngelo (2017) argues that self-management instills a great deal of worry and terror in government. How will the general people react to this sort of change? Will they applaud or condemn a government attempting to innovate and transform? Holacracy and other self-management models lack scientific evidence that they are superior to hierarchies. Holacracy enhanced the relatively modest number of persons in our early test groups. Success in a small team of roughly 20 people does not imply being replicated in considerably bigger companies. There is a danger that the experiment's findings may not live up to the hype, but the potential upside is worth exploring. The hardest part is choosing to act; the rest is just persistence. According to DeAngelo (2017, "As a government agency, the idea of self-management creates a lot of anxiety and fear.”
6. Verma, Y. V. (2016, May 6). Holacracy - crazy, brilliant, disastrous? or a blend of all! Business Today. Retrieved March 3, 2022, from https://www.businesstoday.in/opinion/columns/story/holacracy-crazy-brilliant-disastrous-or-a-blend-of-all-62930-2016-05-06
Verma (2016) argues that holarchy is a hierarchical structure of self-regulating holons that may serve as autonomous wholes and dependent pieces. Holacrats have functions rather than job titles, which allows them to be autonomous. The Holacracy method is thought to have been adopted by numerous for-profit and non-profit organizations in Australia, France, Germany, New Zealand, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Verma (2016) claims that "Holacracy pertains to a quick review, in which everyone is involved in the project discussing issues or red flags or tensions that could come in the way of completing the project.”
