The Case Study Analysis
Repljca
AnnotatedBiblandCaseStudyAnalysisAssignment23-1.docxCASE STUDY ASSIGNMENT AND RUBRIC
The Case Study Analysis is 15% of your course grade and should be posted both under the Week 14 Assignment Link and in the Week 14 discussion board. Please see the following grading criteria.
The Case Study Analysis is the in-depth term paper discussing the case you choose. The Annotated Bibliography is a critique of three references you will use for the Case Study Analysis. The Case Study Analysis is not limited to those three references. You may use as many references as you want. You are required to cite a minimum of three resources for the case study analysis, in proper APA format. The librarian will be setting up a discussion forum after Week 7 to assist you with this process.
Below you will find a table list of cases. All of the cases were mentioned in the eText. Your goal in this assignment is to expand our knowledge of one particular case and the related bioethical issues involved.
Under that heading choose ONE of the cases.
Dolly—Ch.6
Hwang Woo Suk—Ch.6
Davis case—Ch.6
Johns Hopkins cases (1971)—Ch.7
Baby Doe—Ch.7
Baby Jane Doe—Ch.7
Mueller case—Ch.7
Edward Taub—Ch.8
The deadline for posting your case summary is Saturday of Week 14 by 11:59pm.
Respond to two of your classmates' case studies by the end of the day Saturday of Week 14.
|
Criteria |
( CASE STUDY GRADING RUBRIC )Excellent 90-100 |
Good 80-89 |
Fair 60-79 |
Failing under 60 |
Score |
|
Statement of facts of the case 10% |
Full statement of case facts – who, what, when and why |
Includes most of the case facts |
Includes some case facts |
No performance |
/10 |
|
Statement of the issues in the case 10% |
All issues stated |
Some issues stated |
A few issues stated |
No performance |
/10 |
|
Discussion of the issues (250 words) demonstrating mastery of the relevant material pertaining to the case. 50% |
Full discussion of the issues facing each participant |
Some discussion or some participants discussed |
Brief mention or discussion of some of the issues |
No performance |
/50 |
|
Review of ethical framework guiding decisions 10% |
Full discussion of ethical framework that applies to the scenario |
Some discussion |
Brief discussion |
No performance |
/10 |
|
Statement of your point of view regarding the outcome/ recommendations for future care/decisions 10% |
Full discussion of outcome and your opinion WITH rationale |
Some discussion of outcome with rationale |
Brief discussion of outcome. No discussion of rationale |
No performance |
/10 |
|
Citations—3 required 5% |
More than one citation for work read in correct APA format |
Citation for one resource provided. Format not correct |
Citations not correctly APA formatted |
No citations No performance |
/5 |
|
Grammar/Spelling 5% |
No grammatical or spelling errors |
Few grammatical or spelling errors |
Many grammatical or spelling errors |
No performance |
/5 |
Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Excellent 90-100 |
Good 80-89 |
Fair 60-79 |
Failing under 60 |
Score |
|
Annotation Format 15% |
3 citations in alphabetical order with 2 full paragraphs for each citation. |
3 citations in alphabetical order with 2 short paragraphs for each citation. |
Less than 3 citations, not in alphabetical order and/or less than 2 paragraphs for each citation. |
No performance |
/15 |
|
Citation 25% |
All citations in proper APA format |
Some citations in proper APA format |
Citations not in proper APA format |
No performance |
/25 |
|
Readability and Style 25% |
Proper grammar and coherence. Sentences include: a full summary of the material, an evaluation of the source and an explanation of how the source will support their paper. |
Some grammatical errors and incoherent sentences. Some summary and evaluation of the source and some explanation of how the source will support their paper |
Many grammatical errors and incoherent sentences. Brief summary and evaluation of the source and no explanation of how the source will support their paper. |
No performance |
/25 |
|
Quality of Sources 20% |
Provided three reliable and authentic sources |
Provided two reliable and authentic sources |
Provided one reliable and authentic source |
No performance |
/20 |
|
Timely Submission 15% |
Submit before Saturday |
Submit one day after Saturday |
Submit two days after Saturday |
No performance |
/15 |
