Annotated Bibliography

Annotated Bib Draft by Tamika Williams

Submission date: 12-Jul-2022 06:51PM (UTC-0400) Submission ID: 1869811848 File name: Banner_Waitlist_Annotated_Bib.docx (19.69K) Word count: 970 Character count: 4876

Summaries look good except citation info - I need the URL or DOI - if they are not from web, send me a copy for review so I can look over them. One line needs some updating - see similarity report - otherwise GOOD job

1

2

2

4

Improper Citation

1

3

9% SIMILARITY INDEX

9% INTERNET SOURCES

2% PUBLICATIONS

3% STUDENT PAPERS

1 4% 2 3% 3 1%

4 1%

Exclude quotes Off

Exclude bibliography Off

Exclude matches Off

Annotated Bib Draft ORIGINALITY REPORT

PRIMARY SOURCES

digitalcommons.wpi.edu Internet Source

www.science.gov Internet Source

Submitted to American Public University System Student Paper

Submitted to Southern New Hampshire University - Continuing Education Student Paper

QM

FINAL GRADE

94/100 Annotated Bib Draft GRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

PAGE 1

Text Comment. Summaries look good except citation info - I need the URL or DOI - if they are not from web, send me a copy for review so I can look over them. One line needs some updating - see similarity report - otherwise GOOD job

PAGE 2

PAGE 3

Improper Citation Improper citation: Improperly cited material. Please use the link below to find links to information regarding specific citation styles: http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html

PAGE 4

PAGE 5

RUBRIC: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 2022

CONTENT (40%)

A (100)

B (85)

C (75)

D (65)

F (55)

PLAGIARISM (0)

CITATION (30%)

A (100)

B (85)

C (75)

D (65)

F (55)

PLAGIARISM (0)

MLA FORMAT (20%)

A (100)

B (85)

94 / 100

100 / 100

Clear summary, evaluation, and explanation of purpose for each source. Completely developed and well organized annotations. Has correct number of sources.

Includes all parts of annotation: summary, evaluation, and explanation of purpose for each source. Adequately developed and organized. Has correct number of sources.

Includes all parts of annotation: summary, evaluation, and explanation of purpose for each source. Lacks development and/or organization. Has correct number of sources.

Missing one or more parts of an annotation: summary, evaluation, and explanation of purpose, or fewer sources than required.

Missing two or more parts of an annotation: summary, evaluation, and explanation of purpose, or fewer sources than required.

Plagiarism

85 / 100

Correctly formatted MLA citations. Sources from GALILEO.

MLA formatted citations with one or two small mistakes. Sources from GALILEO.

MLA citations formatted mostly correctly. Sources from GALILEO.

Large mistakes in MLA formatting. Sources from GALILEO; some inappropriate sources.

Inappropriate sources, and/or significant mistakes in formatting. No sources from GALILEO.

Plagiarism

100 / 100

100% correct

Mostly correct with only one minor MLA document formatting mistake.

C (75)

D (65)

F (55)

PLAGIARISM (0)

GRAMMAR/TONE (10%)

A (100)

B (85)

C (75)

D (65)

F (55)

PLAGIARISM (0)

Mostly correct MLA document formatting; may have some minor mistakes.

MLA Format 20% Plagiarism Significant mistakes in MLA document formatting. Multiple minor mistakes in MLA document formatting. Mostly correct MLA document formatting; may have some minor mistakes. Mostly correct with only one minor MLA document formatting mistake. 100% correct

Significant mistakes in MLA document formatting.

Plagiarism

85 / 100

No grammar or structure issues; no use of second person.

Grammar and structure does not affect readability; minor issues; no use of second person.

Grammar and structure somewhat affect readability; minor issues; no use of second person.

Grammar and structure affect readability of annotations; some use of second person

Errors in grammar and structure make annotations incoherent; excessive use of second person.

Plagiarism