edwards

1

The Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Programs in Reducing Juvenile Recidivism

Shaquanna Edwards

Liberty University

September 4, 2025

2

The Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Programs in Reducing Juvenile Recidivism

The research problem suggested in this study is the effectiveness of restorative justice

programs to help decrease recidivism among juvenile offenders. Restorative justice highlights

the value of mending damage based on collaborative efforts between offenders, victims, and

communities, as well as accountability, reconciliation, and rehabilitation, instead of punishment.

It has been proposed that restorative justice is associated with small to moderate delinquent

behavior reduction alongside an improvement in victim satisfaction and fairness perceptions

(Kimbrell et al., 2023). This is supported by the fact that there is increasing use of restorative

justice in the international community as a measure to deal with juvenile offending.

Conventional punishment is more likely not to correlate with developmental science, which

presents evidence that adolescent delinquency is most closely associated with psychosocial

immaturity (Cavanagh, 2022). In turn, the discussion of restorative justice as a possible option

can offer useful information about how reoffending can be reduced sustainably, helping the

youth develop.

Restorative justice should also be heard outside of criminology as it shows values of

forgiveness, reconciliation, and peacebuilding. Scholars hold that restorative justice is conducive

to social healing in the long term through dialogue and reintegration rather than punishment

(Boehle, 2021; Martínez-Bernal et al., 2024). In this way, the study comes at an opportune and

relevant time when restorative justice programs could be more humane and developmentally

appropriate to juvenile justice reform.

3

Research Questions

1. What is the effect of the restorative justice programs on the recidivism rate of

juvenile offenders as compared to the traditional punitive systems?

All meta-analyses did point to a moderate effect of restorative justice programs on future

delinquency, although this effect is not consistent across the program design and the

quality of the evaluation (Kimbrell et al., 2023). Transmission restorative justice and

reoffending may be a systematic review that outlines how the policy relevance to policy

agenda can be evidenced (Gaffney et al., 2024).

2. What are the most valuable elements of restorative justice programs that can be

used to minimize juvenile recidivism?

Victim-offender mediation, family group conferencing, and community engagement were

effective in decreasing reoffending and enhancing accountability (Kimbrell et al., 2023).

Researchers highlight the convergence of restorative justice and behavioral science, while

arguing that restorative justice works best if evidence-based practices like skill-building,

reinforcement, and community integration are applied (Pavlacic et al., 2022). Knowing

what works can guide more impactful program development.

3. To what degree do demographic factors such as age, gender, or socioeconomic status

influence the effectiveness of restorative justice programs in reducing recidivism?

Adolescent development research finds that youth respond differently to interventions

depending on their developmental stage and context (Cavanagh, 2022). Younger

offenders may be affected by restorative justice processes differently from older

adolescents, and cultural or socioeconomic contexts may affect the practice of

forgiveness and reconciliation (Martínez-Bernal et al., 2024). Examining such

4

determinants ensures restorative justice programs' equality and effectiveness across

heterogeneous populations.

Biblical Perspective

Restorative justice is consistent with biblical principles of reconciliation, forgiveness, and

restoration. Matthew 18:15–17 teaches resolving disputes through conversation, which is

consistent with restorative justice's emphasis on healing harm through conversation. Galatians

6:1–2 demands restoring those who have done wrong gently, which is in line with restorative

justice’s rehabilitative orientation. Likewise, Zechariah 7:9–10 supports justice shown with

compassion, which is in sync with restorative justice's focus on mercy and community healing.

These are reflected in new peacebuilding literature, where reconciliation and forgiveness are

considered crucial for durable justice (Boehle, 2021). This adds emphasis on the spiritual and

moral foundations of restorative justice practice.

Conclusion

The proposed topic and research questions provide a strong foundation for assessing the

efficacy of restorative justice in combating recidivism among juveniles. Existing evidence

supports that restorative justice programs decrease reoffending moderately and increase victim

satisfaction as well as offender accountability. Central components, such as victim-offender

mediation and community involvement, appear central to their success. In addition, the

application of developmental science ensures that these programs are tailored for adolescents

specifically. Lastly, addressing cultural and demographic contexts, this research ensures a non-

exclusionary exploration of restorative justice’s potential. Ultimately, restorative justice not only

addresses recidivism but is rooted in principles of reconciliation, peacebuilding, and redemption.

5

References

Boehle, J. (2021). Forgiveness, restorative justice and reconciliation in sustainable

peacebuilding: contemporary debates and future possibilities. Global Change, Peace &

Security, 33(2), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2021.1910226

Cavanagh, C. (2022). Healthy adolescent development and the juvenile justice system:

Challenges and solutions. Child Development Perspectives, 16(3), 141-147.

https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/cdep.12461

Gaffney, H., Jolliffe, D., Eggins, E., Ferreira, J. G., Skinner, G., Ariel, B., & Strang, H. (2024).

Protocol: The effect of restorative justice interventions for young people on offending

and reoffending: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20(2), e1403.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cl2.1403

Kimbrell, C. S., Wilson, D. B., & Olaghere, A. (2023). Restorative justice programs and

practices in juvenile justice: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis for

effectiveness. Criminology & Public Policy, 22(1), 161-195.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1745-9133.12613

Martínez-Bernal, D. R., Cardozo-Rusinque, A. A., De la Peña-Leiva, A., Turizo-Palencia, Y.,

Morales-Cuadro, A., Arenas-Rivera, C., ... & Martínez-González, M. B. (2024). From

Conflict to Peace: Exploring Forgiveness, Reconciliation, and Nonviolence in

Colombia. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 13(3), 236-

257.

https://mail.hipatiapress.com/hpjournals/index.php/rimcis/article/download/14470/4859

6

Pavlacic, J. M., Kellum, K. K., & Schulenberg, S. E. (2022). Advocating for the use of

restorative justice practices: Examining the overlap between restorative justice and

behavior analysis. Behavior analysis in practice, 15(4), 1237-1246.

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40617-021-00632-1.pdf