modify my paper for final the final draft

University of Phoenix

October 14, 2019

ENG/200

Monte Gast

Animal Rights Argumentative

Yes, animals do deserve rights, they are living animals, they deserve to live a good life, and they don’t deserve cruelty. Some humans mishandle animals and their rights are abused which end up taking moral, pragmatic structure. An individual has the tendency to come up with the idea of rights in the light of the faith in the characteristic, the right that is given by God, they also expect these rights to be widespread and hence apply to all the other without being questioned.

Just like human beings, the animals have their rights and they are fit for their survival, the animals are also subject to existence. They also feel the delight and the agony, they recollect, they have the experience, they foresee, they are able to learn, additionally what happens to the animals is very vital to them and different from what happens to the other non-living creatures. There is an ethical issue that provides the animals with the rights to similar thoughts and delights or satisfactions.

There is the entitlement that living creatures are all the same and the human animals and the other non-human creature rights are not supposed to be contrasted. As a man, there are different obligations that we are all expected to meet in order to perceive the family, club or even his own city as his. When the man’s rights are not met, then they may end up being viewed to be unable to address the problems that are in the organization where they work since they do not meet his needs.

The ethical status of the different creatures shows us that the scholars comprehended and they have been denying the creature have the rights that they are supposed to have (Armstrong & Botzler, 2016). When we start reasoning in that line, then we will come to find out that people have very little obligations specifically the animals that they have nothing to do with them. The ethical analysis of the animals and their rights helps to spread the space and more natural habits for the animals. Some allies do not see the right that is proved to be essentially wrong, any more than just giving the lab animals more of the anesthesia. When this is done in amounts that are not ideal may cause the situation to become even worse.

Animals have the right to receive the best treatments, the animals are sometimes done injustice and they are sometimes hunted for sports which makes their rights to be violated. The rights that protect the animals should protect them from being used as testers of cosmetics. The animal's rights are not honored when their fur is being used for other activities like making luxury items.

The animals have the right to live in a conducive environment, most of the time we are the people who destroy the animal's habitats and they are not able to protect themselves from prey (Garner, 2016). Most of the habitats are destroyed by human agricultural activities when they fail to take into the interest of the protection of the animal's rights. Many animal specials are today endangered since they are always threatened and their rights assumed.

References Armstrong, S. J., & Botzler, R. G. (Eds.). (2016). The animal ethics reader. Taylor & Francis.

Garner, R. (Ed.). (2016). Animal rights: The changing debate. Springer.