HRM 517 Original Work Only, No plagiarism

profilenoran.1
AnalyzetheprioritizingprocessatD.docx

Analyze the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson.48(20%)

Levels of Achievement:

Unacceptable 0 (0%) - 33.12 (13.8%)

Fair 33.6 (14%) - 37.92 (15.8%)

Proficient 38.4 (16%) - 42.72 (17.8%)

Exemplary 43.2 (18%) - 48 (20%)

2. Suggest two (2) recommendations to improve the prioritizing process.42.72(17.8%)

Levels of Achievement:

Unacceptable 0 (0%) - 33.12 (13.8%)

Fair 33.6 (14%) - 37.92 (15.8%)

Proficient 38.4 (16%) - 42.72 (17.8%)

Exemplary 43.2 (18%) - 48 (20%)

3. Create a scenario where the implemented process at D. D. Williamson would not work.40.8(17%)

Levels of Achievement:

Unacceptable 0 (0%) - 33.12 (13.8%)

Fair 33.6 (14%) - 37.92 (15.8%)

Proficient 38.4 (16%) - 42.72 (17.8%)

Exemplary 43.2 (18%) - 48 (20%)

4. Project five (5) years ahead and speculate whether or not D. D. Williamson will be using the same process. Justify your answer.40.8(17%)

Levels of Achievement:

Unacceptable 0 (0%) - 33.12 (13.8%)

Fair 33.6 (14%) - 37.92 (15.8%)

Proficient 38.4 (16%) - 42.72 (17.8%)

Exemplary 43.2 (18%) - 48 (20%)

5. Include four (4) references.18(7.5%)

Levels of Achievement:

Unacceptable 0 (0%) - 16.56 (6.9%)

Fair 16.8 (7%) - 18.96 (7.9%)

Proficient 19.2 (8%) - 21.36 (8.9%)

Exemplary 21.6 (9%) - 24 (10%)

6. Clarity and writing mechanics.20.4(8.5%)

Levels of Achievement:

Unacceptable 0 (0%) - 16.56 (6.9%)

Fair 16.8 (7%) - 18.96 (7.9%)

Proficient 19.2 (8%) - 21.36 (8.9%)

Exemplary 21.6 (9%) - 24 (10%)

Raw Total: 210.72 (of 240.0)

Name:Week 3 Assignment 1: Grading Strategies at D.D. Williamson

Description:Week 3 Assignment 1: Grading Strategies at D.D. Williamson