|
Analysis of Reading Comprehension
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose
|
|
32 pts
Advanced
Your response focuses on significant reading and comprehension skills. A significant strength and weakness are identified and supported thoroughly with specific evidence from both the passage and the retelling of the passage
|
27.2 pts
Proficient
Your response focuses on reading and comprehension skills. A strength and weakness are identified and supported with specific evidence from both the passage and the retelling of the passage
|
22.4 pts
Basic
Your response focuses on reading OR comprehension skills. A strength and weakness are identified and supported with specific evidence from the passage OR the retelling of the passage
|
17.6 pts
Basic
Your response is vaguely focused on reading comprehension. A strength and weakness are identified but supported with little or no specific evidence
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
32 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #4 - Content Knowledge
The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and creates learning experiences that make these aspects of the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking
|
1 pts
Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
|
|
--
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSubject Knowledge
|
|
32 pts
Advanced
The application of subject knowledge is accurate and substantial, including the use of terminology. The distinction between inferential and literal comprehension is clearly stated. Areas where the student needs intervention are clearly identified and addressed
|
27.2 pts
Proficient
The application of subject knowledge is accurate, including the use of terminology. The distinction between inferential and literal comprehension is apparent. Areas where the student needs intervention are identified and addressed.
|
22.4 pts
Basic
The application of subject knowledge is mostly accurate, including the use of terminology. Some distinction between inferential and literal comprehension is made. Areas where the student needs intervention are identified.
|
17.6 pts
Basic
The application of subject knowledge is minimal or inaccurate, and terminology is lacking. Little to no distinction between inferential and literal comprehension is made. Areas where the student needs intervention are ignored.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
32 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #4B - Content Knowledge
The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and creates learning experiences that make these aspects of the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills
|
|
--
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCAEP R1.2 Content
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking
|
1 pts
Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills
|
|
--
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport
|
|
32 pts
Advanced
Examples from the text and retelling are both relevant and important to the discussion. Support is sound and the examples are of high quality. The examples and the discussion of the examples are clearly related and in context.
|
27.2 pts
Proficient
Examples from the text and/or retelling are both relevant and important to the discussion. Support is sound and the examples are of high quality. The examples and the discussion of the examples are clearly related.
|
22.4 pts
Basic
Examples from the text or retelling are relevant to the discussion. Support and examples are present. There is discussion of the examples.
|
17.6 pts
Basic
Examples from the text or retelling are minimal or missing. Little to no support or examples are present. There is little to no discussion of the examples.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
32 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #4C - Content Knowledge
The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and creates learning experiences that make these aspects of the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
|
|
--
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCAEP R1.2B Content
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
|
|
--
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRationale
|
|
32 pts
Advanced
The response is ably reasoned and relates each part of the discussion to the whole picture of the student’s comprehension. The choice of selection of the strength/ weakness, the explanations given and the examples all show a comprehensive understanding of reading comprehension. The conclusion brings the threads of the discussion together.
|
27.2 pts
Proficient
The response relates each part of the discussion to the whole picture of the student’s comprehension. The choice of selection of the strength/ weakness, the explanations given and the examples all show a good understanding of reading comprehension. The conclusion neatly summarizes the discussion.
|
22.4 pts
Basic
The response focuses on the student’s comprehension. The choice of selection of the strength/ weakness, the explanations given and the examples all show a basic understanding of reading comprehension. The conclusion restates the main points.
|
17.6 pts
Basic
The response minimally focuses on the student’s comprehension. The choice of selection of the strength/ weakness, the explanations given and the examples all show little to no understanding of reading comprehension. The conclusion is minimal or lacking.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
32 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #4D - Content Knowledge
The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and creates learning experiences that make these aspects of the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
|
|
--
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCAEP R1.2C Content
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
|
|
--
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA-compliant formatting
|
|
10 pts
Advanced
Consistently follows APA format. There is a properly formatted and accurate reference page (NO errors)
|
8.5 pts
Proficient
Consistently follows APA format. There is a properly formatted and accurate reference page (1-2 MINOR errors).
|
7 pts
Basic
Limited (3-5) APA errors in APA format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references.
|
5.5 pts
Basic
More than 5 APA errors in format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references.(
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
|
|
12 pts
Advanced
The presentation demonstrates exceptional use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). NO ERRORS.
|
10.2 pts
Proficient
The presentation demonstrates consistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (1-2 MINOR errors).
|
8.4 pts
Basic
The presentation demonstrates inconsistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (3-5 errors).
|
6.6 pts
Basic
The presentation does NOT demonstrate use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (More than 5 errors).
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
12 pts
|
|
Total Points: 150
|
Smcnelson
AnalysisofReadingComprehension.docx
