Nutrition And Fitness

profileKaran11
Analysis1grading.pdf

2/18/22, 1:33 PM Analysis of Scientific Literature Paper #1

https://sjsu.instructure.com/courses/1477261/assignments/6033861 2/3

Criteria Ratings Pts

5 pts

10 pts

4 pts

5 pts

3 pts

6 pts

6 pts

Followed directions, formatted correctly, Turnitin report confirms originality

5 to >4.0 pts Excellent format, followed directions and original writing

4 to >2.0 pts Some directions not followed or errors in fomatting or originality

2 to >0 pts Major flaws in formatting, following directions and originality

Writing, Syntax, Spelling, Grammar 10 to >9.0 pts Excellent writing, showed clear understanding

9 to >5.0 pts Some errors in writing, syntax, spelling and grammar

5 to >0 pts Major flaws in writing, syntax, spelling and grammar.

Question 1 - State the research problem clearly

4 to >3.0 pts Excellent, showed clear understanding

3 to >2.0 pts Good, showed basic level of understanding

2 to >0 pts Poor, showed lack of understanding, or not included

Question 2 - Describe the author's hypothesis and research goals clearly

5 to >4.0 pts Excellent, showed clear understanding

4 to >2.0 pts Good, showed basic level of understanding

2 to >0 pts Poor, showed lack of understanding or not included

Question 3 - Describe the participant inclusion and exclusion criteria

3 to >2.0 pts Excellent, showed clear understanding

2 to >1.0 pts Good, showed basic level of understanding

1 to >0 pts Poor, showed lack of understanding or not included

Question 4 - Describe the study design 6 to >5.0 pts Excellent, showed clear understanding

5 to >3.0 pts Good, showed basic level of understanding

3 to >0 pts Poor, showed lack of understanding, or not included

Question 5 - Describe the study results clearly in one's own words

6 to >5.0 pts Excellent, showed clear understanding

5 to >3.0 pts Good, showed basic level of understanding

3 to >0 pts Poor, showed lack of understanding or not included

2/18/22, 1:33 PM Analysis of Scientific Literature Paper #1

https://sjsu.instructure.com/courses/1477261/assignments/6033861 3/3

Total Points: 50

Criteria Ratings Pts

2 pts

3 pts

6 pts

Question 6 - Did the results support the researcher's hypothesis?

2 pts Excellent, showed clear understanding

1 pts Good, showed basic level of understanding

0 pts Poor, showed lack of understanding or not included

Question 7 - Describe the limitations and strengths of the research study

3 to >2.0 pts Excellent, showed clear understanding

2 to >1.0 pts Good, showed basic level of understanding

1 to >0 pts Poor, showed lack of understanding or not included

Question 8 - What were the conclusions of the study and how can they be appled to real life? What ideas for future research did this study spark?

6 to >5.0 pts Excellent, showed clear understanding

5 to >3.0 pts Good, showed basic level of understanding

3 to >0 pts Poor, showed lack of understanding or not included