Nutrition And Fitness
2/18/22, 1:33 PM Analysis of Scientific Literature Paper #1
https://sjsu.instructure.com/courses/1477261/assignments/6033861 2/3
Criteria Ratings Pts
5 pts
10 pts
4 pts
5 pts
3 pts
6 pts
6 pts
Followed directions, formatted correctly, Turnitin report confirms originality
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent format, followed directions and original writing
4 to >2.0 pts Some directions not followed or errors in fomatting or originality
2 to >0 pts Major flaws in formatting, following directions and originality
Writing, Syntax, Spelling, Grammar 10 to >9.0 pts Excellent writing, showed clear understanding
9 to >5.0 pts Some errors in writing, syntax, spelling and grammar
5 to >0 pts Major flaws in writing, syntax, spelling and grammar.
Question 1 - State the research problem clearly
4 to >3.0 pts Excellent, showed clear understanding
3 to >2.0 pts Good, showed basic level of understanding
2 to >0 pts Poor, showed lack of understanding, or not included
Question 2 - Describe the author's hypothesis and research goals clearly
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent, showed clear understanding
4 to >2.0 pts Good, showed basic level of understanding
2 to >0 pts Poor, showed lack of understanding or not included
Question 3 - Describe the participant inclusion and exclusion criteria
3 to >2.0 pts Excellent, showed clear understanding
2 to >1.0 pts Good, showed basic level of understanding
1 to >0 pts Poor, showed lack of understanding or not included
Question 4 - Describe the study design 6 to >5.0 pts Excellent, showed clear understanding
5 to >3.0 pts Good, showed basic level of understanding
3 to >0 pts Poor, showed lack of understanding, or not included
Question 5 - Describe the study results clearly in one's own words
6 to >5.0 pts Excellent, showed clear understanding
5 to >3.0 pts Good, showed basic level of understanding
3 to >0 pts Poor, showed lack of understanding or not included
2/18/22, 1:33 PM Analysis of Scientific Literature Paper #1
https://sjsu.instructure.com/courses/1477261/assignments/6033861 3/3
Total Points: 50
Criteria Ratings Pts
2 pts
3 pts
6 pts
Question 6 - Did the results support the researcher's hypothesis?
2 pts Excellent, showed clear understanding
1 pts Good, showed basic level of understanding
0 pts Poor, showed lack of understanding or not included
Question 7 - Describe the limitations and strengths of the research study
3 to >2.0 pts Excellent, showed clear understanding
2 to >1.0 pts Good, showed basic level of understanding
1 to >0 pts Poor, showed lack of understanding or not included
Question 8 - What were the conclusions of the study and how can they be appled to real life? What ideas for future research did this study spark?
6 to >5.0 pts Excellent, showed clear understanding
5 to >3.0 pts Good, showed basic level of understanding
3 to >0 pts Poor, showed lack of understanding or not included