revising my reseach papers
kad
Among40participants27werefemales.docxAmong 40 participants 27 were females, and 7 were males. Majority of them were nursing students (%?), one was an athletic science major, one sport science major, one biomedical engineering major and one undecided about his major. Students were invited to take the anonymous survey by answering only two questions:
1. What was the reason for taking the human anatomy and physiology course?
2. What level of difficulty they expect in human anatomy and physiology course?
The survey revealed that a vast majority of the students (%?) took this course as a required class for their major. Regarding the level of difficulty most students (%?) anticipated that it will be hard or very hard course. In contrast, a few students (%) mentioned that in their opinion the course would not be very difficult.
References
De Meester, L. (2011). Learning Anatomy for Use Beyond the Classroom: A Guide for Medical Students. MUMJ, 8(1), 45-48.
DeHoff, M., Clark, K., & Meganathan, K. (2011). Learning outcomes and student-perceived value of clay modeling and cat dissection in undergraduate human anatomy and physiology. Advances In Physiology Education, 35(1), 68-75. doi: 10.1152/advan.00094.2010
Johnston, A., & McAllister, M. (2008). Back to the Future with Hands-On Science: Students’ Perceptions of Learning Anatomy and Physiology. Journal Of Nursing Education, 47(9), 417-421. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20080901-04
Lieu, R., Gutierrez, A., & Shaffer, J. (2018). Student Perceived Difficulties in Learning Organ Systems in an Undergraduate Human Anatomy Course. HAPS Educator, 22(1), 84-92. doi: 10.21692/haps.2018.011
Lombardi, S., Hicks, R., Thompson, K., & Marbach-Ad, G. (2014). Are all hands-on activities equally effective? Effect of using plastic models, organ dissections, and virtual dissections on student learning and perceptions. Advances In Physiology Education, 38(1), 80-86. doi: 10.1152/advan.00154.2012
Notebaert, A. (2009). Student perceptions about learning anatomy. Iowa Research Online, 1-124.
Waters, J., Van Meter, P., Perrotti, W., Drogo, S., & Cyr, R. (2011). Human clay models versus cat dissection: how the similarity between the classroom and the exam affects student performance. Advances In Physiology Education, 35(2), 227-236. doi: 10.1152/advan.00030.2009
Wright, S. (2012). Student perceptions of an upper-level, undergraduate human anatomy laboratory course without cadavers. Anatomical Sciences Education, 5(3), 146-157. doi: 10.1002/ase.1265
Kramer, Beverley & Soley, J. (2002). Medical student perception of problem topics in anatomy. East African medical journal. 79. 408-14. 10.4314/eamj.v79i8.8826.
Sturges, D., & Maurer, T.W. (2013). Allied Health Students’ Perceptions of Class Difficulty: The Case of Undergraduate Human Anatomy and Physiology Classes.
Krontiris-Litowitz J. (2009). Articulating scientific reasoning improves student learning in an undergraduate anatomy and physiology course. CBE life sciences education, 8(4), 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-11-0066
Reiss, Michael & Tunnicliffe, Sue. (2001). Students' Understandings of Human Organs and Organ Systems. Research in Science Education. 31. 383-399. 10.1023/A:1013116228261.
Ang, E. T., Yip, G., Lim, E. C. H., & Sugand, K. (2014). Learning undergraduate human anatomy – reflections on undergraduate preferences in Singapore: a pilot study. Journal of the NUS Teaching Academy, 4(1), 36-52.
McLachlan, John & Patten, Debra. (2006). Anatomy teaching: Ghosts of the past, present and future. Medical education. 40. 243-53. 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02401.x.
Wilson, M., Shepherd, I., Kelly, C., & Pitzner, J. (2005). Assessment of a low-fidelity human patient simulator for the acquisition of nursing skills. Nurse Education Today, 25, 56-67
