three question
vinamit
AmericanHydropowerCaseStudyGlobalInvestment.pptxForming Global Investment
A case study of American Hydropower managing cultural distance between the US and Uganda
Learning Objectives
The global investment formation process
Case Study. American Hydropower managing cultural distance between the US and Uganda
Major steps in forming global investment process
Social motivation factors
Worker (human) motivation factors
Ecological motivation factors
Critical Reflection – What can we really learn from the case of American Hydropower?
The benefits of being socially minded
The costs of being worker minded
The Global Investment Formation Process
Social motivation factors
Is there a unique cultural capability cost?
Global x Unique Including unique globally 1/Adaptation
“I am the Leader” Inclusion tactics managing costs of globally servicing (desired) American capability
“Be the Leader” Inclusion tactics seeking benefits of globally servicing (desirable) leader capability
Identifying three criteria factors
Predominating factor – what are the costs of desired power distance?
Dominating factor – what are the benefits of desirable gender egalitarianism (i.e. including invisible and non-privileged identities)?
Deciding factor – do we have the capability for servicing the desired group collectivism energy, without ascending the adaptive costs of servicing the desirable group collectivism energy? (if not, then adaptation needs investment)
Assessing the costs of desired power distance (I am American condition)
Worker (human) motivation factors
Is there a diversity workculture benefit? (if yes, then your diversity investment could facilitate servicing of the desired American cultural capability)
Inclusion x Diversity Global Engagement Aggregation
“Behaving Leader” place engagement diversity investment cost of servicing the desired cultural capability
“Becoming Leader” basket engagement diversity investment benefit from servicing the desirable cultural capability
Managing three condition factors
Predominating factor – what are the performance oriented costs of servicing the desired “follower” cultural capability?
Dominating factor – what are the collective interest benefits of servicing the desirable “leader” cultural capability?
Deciding factor - Do we have the capability for servicing the collective interest benefits of the desirable assertiveness capability, but not the performance oriented costs of the desired follower capability? (if not, then aggregation needs investment)
Assessing the benefits of desirable gender egalitarianism (Be the leader condition)
Ecological motivation factors
What are the ecological benefits and costs of leadership responsibility?
Diversity x Engagement Global Responsibility 1/Arbitrage
“Behaving leader” responsibility ecological cost of servicing the desired American capability
“Becoming leader” responsibility ecological benefit of servicing the desirable leader capability
Developing three effect values
Predominating factor. What are the costs of “uncertainty avoiding” for taking global leadership responsibility about global ecological costs?
Dominating factor. What are the benefits of “future oriented” local leadership responsibility about local ecological costs?
Deciding factor. Do we have the capability for servicing “humane oriented” benefits of the desirable future oriented local responsibility, without the costs of the desired uncertainty avoiding global responsibility? (if not, then arbitrage needs investment)
Overall benefits and costs of GUIDER factors
Regional Cluster Value Assessment – servicing our regional culture-effect vs. trading their international leader-effect
Creating a proficient international networking system: GUIDER factor x SHEENY factor DIVINE networking Developing sustainable growth
ONE GUIDER factor. Will servicing our local desired culture-effect limit the trading of their desirable international leader-effect?
Social costs?
Human (worker) costs?
Ecological costs?
INFINITE GUIDER factor. Will not servicing our desired local culture-effect catalyze the trading of their desirable international leader-effect?
Economic benefits?
National benefits?
Psychological benefits?
The case of American Hydropower
What can we really learn?
The Global Investment Formation Process
Social motivation factors
Is there a unique cultural capability cost?
Global x Unique Including unique globally 1/Adaptation
“I am the Leader” Inclusion tactics managing costs of globally servicing (desired) American capability What is the cultural capability desired by Green ?
“Be the Leader” Inclusion tactics seeking benefits of globally servicing (desirable) leader capability What is the desirable cultural capability in Uganda?
The Global Investment Formation Process
Social motivation factors
Identifying three criteria factors
Predominating factor – what are the costs of desired power distance?
Dominating factor – what are the benefits of desirable gender egalitarianism (i.e. including invisible and non-privileged identities)?
Deciding factor – do we have the capability for servicing the desired group collectivism energy, without ascending the adaptive costs of servicing the desirable group collectivism energy? (if not, then adaptation needs investment) What forms of investment do you recommend to Hydropower for the desired adaptation?
Assessing the costs of desired power distance (I am American condition)
Worker (human) motivation factors
Is there a diversity workculture benefit? (if yes, then your diversity investment could facilitate servicing of the desired American cultural capability)
Inclusion x Diversity Global Engagement Aggregation
“Behaving Leader” place engagement diversity investment cost of servicing the desired cultural capability what would be the impact on stakeholder motivation if Green’s desired cultural approach is adopted by Martin?
“Becoming Leader” basket engagement diversity investment benefit from servicing the desirable cultural capability what has been the impact on stakeholder leadership motivation as a consequence of the desirable cultural approach adopted by Martin?
Assessing the costs of desired power distance (I am American condition)
Worker (human) motivation factors
Managing three condition factors
Predominating factor – what are the performance oriented costs of servicing the desired “follower” cultural capability?
Dominating factor – what are the collective interest benefits of servicing the desirable “leader” cultural capability?
Deciding factor - Do we have the capability for servicing the collective interest benefits of the desirable assertiveness capability, but not the performance oriented costs of the desired follower capability? (if not, then aggregation needs investment) What forms of investment do you recommend to Hydropower for the desired aggregation?
Assessing the benefits of desirable gender egalitarianism (Be the leader condition)
Ecological motivation factors
What are the ecological benefits and costs of leadership responsibility?
Diversity x Engagement Global Responsibility 1/Arbitrage
“Behaving leader” responsibility ecological cost of servicing the desired American capability What are the ecological benefits and costs of servicing the desired American capability?
“Becoming leader” responsibility ecological benefit of servicing the desirable leader capability What are the ecological benefits and costs of servicing the desired American capability?
Assessing the benefits of desirable gender egalitarianism (Be the leader condition)
Ecological motivation factors
Developing three effect values
Predominating factor. What are the costs of “uncertainty avoiding” for taking global leadership responsibility about global ecological costs?
Dominating factor. What are the benefits of “future oriented” local leadership responsibility about local ecological costs?
Deciding factor. Do we have the capability for servicing “humane oriented” benefits of the desirable future oriented local responsibility, without the costs of the desired uncertainty avoiding global responsibility? (if not, then arbitrage needs investment) What forms of investment do you recommend to Hydropower for the desired arbitrage?
Overall benefits and costs of GUIDER factors
Regional Cluster Value Assessment – servicing our regional culture-effect vs. trading their international leader-effect
Creating a proficient international networking system: GUIDER factor x SHEENY factor DIVINE networking Developing sustainable growth
ONE GUIDER factor. Will servicing our local desired culture-effect limit the trading of their desirable international leader-effect?
Social costs? - what will be these social costs (&benefits)?
Human (worker) costs? – what will be these human costs (&benefits)?
Ecological costs? – what will be these ecological costs (&benefits)?
Overall benefits and costs of GUIDER factors
Regional Cluster Value Assessment – servicing our regional culture-effect vs. trading their international leader-effect
Creating a proficient international networking system: GUIDER factor x SHEENY factor DIVINE networking Developing sustainable growth
INFINITE GUIDER factor. Will not servicing our desired local culture-effect catalyze the trading of their desirable international leader-effect?
Economic benefits? – what will be these economic benefits (&costs)?
National benefits? – what will be these national benefits (& costs)?
Psychological benefits? – what will be these psychological benefits (& costs)?
Summary of Learning – Final takeaways
To form global investment, we need to own global CAGE, and
assess social motivation factors across borders
assess worker (human) motivation factors across borders
assess ecological motivation factors across borders
assess regional cultural motivation factors across borders
Ownership of global CAGE = Infinite GUIDER Power
Divergence ideal. Present desired networking system = One GUIDER power, but <1 SHEENY benefit cost ratio accrued on its investment by Hydropower
Convergence theory. Developing desirable workforce system = Infinite GUIDER power, and >1 SHEENY benefit cost ratio accrued on its investment by Hydropower
Sustainable approach. Proficient exchange system for descending the costs of investing into GUIDER power = Zero GUIDER power, with =1 SHEENY benefit cost ratio accrued on its investment by Hydropower
