homework
AMERICAN CORRECTIONS
Twelfth Edition
Chapter 3
The History of Corrections in America
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
1
Learning Objectives (1 of 2)
Describe “The Great Law” of Pennsylvania and note its importance.
Compare and contrast the basic assumptions of the penitentiary systems of Pennsylvania and New York.
Discuss the elements of the Cincinnati Declaration.
Identify the reforms advocated by the Progressives.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Learning Objectives (2 of 2)
Discuss the assumptions of the medical model, regarding the nature of criminal behavior and its correction.
Illustrate how the community model reflected the social and political values of the 1960s and 1970s.
Describe the forces and events that led to the present crime control model
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Colonial Period
William Penn
Adopted the Great Law of Pennsylvania
Based on humane Quaker principles and emphasized hard labor in a house of correction as punishment for most crimes
Death reserved for premeditated murder
The law was used until 1718 when it was replaced by the Anglican Code
The Anglican Code featuring 13 laws, 12 of which were punishable by death (larceny was the exception)
Corporal punishment was used for a variety of offenses
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Learning Objective 1: Describe “The Great Law” of Pennsylvania and note its importance.
4
The Arrival of the Penitentiary (1 of 5)
Penitentiary was an institution intended to isolate individuals convicted of a crime from society and from one another so that they could reflect on their past misdeeds, repent, and thus undergo reformation.
First appeared in 1790
Philadelphia’s Walnut Street Jail
By 1830, foreign observers were looking at the American System as a model
Tocqueville
William Crawford
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Learning Objective 2: Compare and contrast the basic assumptions of the penitentiary system of Pennsylvania and New York.
5
The Arrival of the Penitentiary (2 of 5)
The Pennsylvania System Principles
Prisoners would not be treated vengefully but should be convinced that through hard and selective forms of suffering they could change their lives.
Solitary confinement would prevent further corruption inside prison.
In isolation, incarcerated individuals would reflect on their transgressions and repent.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Arrival of the Penitentiary (3 of 5)
The Pennsylvania System Principles
Solitary confinement would be punishment because humans are by nature social beings.
Solitary confinement would be economical because incarcerated individuals would not need long periods of time to repent, and therefore fewer keepers would be needed and the costs of clothing would be lower.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Discussion Question
What is your opinion of the role and usefulness of solitary confinement in prison?
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Arrival of the Penitentiary (4 of 5)
The New York (Auburn) System
Congregate System
Incarcerated individuals held in isolation at night but congregated on workshops during the day under a rule of silence. Incarcerated individuals were forbidden from talking or even looking at each other while working.
Contract Labor System
Labor of incarcerated individuals sold on a contractual basis to private employers who provided the machinery and raw materials with which incarcerated individuals made salable products in the institution. States negotiated contracts with manufacturers and incarcerated individuals created raw goods.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Arrival of the Penitentiary (5 of 5)
Debating the Systems
Questions about disciplining citizens in democracy and maintaining conformity to social norms
Proponents of New York System believed incarcerated individuals had to first “be broken”
Proponents of Auburn System rejected harsh punishment
Most European visitors favored the Auburn system regarding the design and management of penitentiaries
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Table 3.1 Comparison of Pennsylvania and New York (Auburn) Prison Systems
| Goal | Implementation | Method | Activity | |
| Pennsylvania (Separate System) | Redemption through the well ordered routine of the prison | Isolation, penance, contemplation, labor, silence | Individuals are kept in their cells for eating, sleeping, and working. | Bible reading, working on crafts in cell |
| New York (Auburn) (Congregate System) | Redemption through the well ordered routine of the prison | Strict discipline, obedience, labor, silence | Individuals sleep in their cells but come together to eat and work | Working together in shops making goods to be sold by the state |
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Discussion Question (1 of 2)
Which of the two systems—the Pennsylvania or New York system—do you believe to be the better model for prisons? Why?
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Development of Prisons in the South and West
Lease System
Incarcerated individuals were leased to contractors who provided incarcerated individuals with food and clothing in exchange for their labor. In southern states, the incarcerated individuals were used as field laborers.
Leasing program used extensively in California, Montana, Oregon, and Wyoming until passage of the Anti-Contract Law of 1887.
Upon becoming a state in 1850, California reformatted its system, which led to San Quentin and other prison reforms.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Reformatory Movement (1 of 5)
By mid-1800s, reformers became disillusioned with the penitentiary due to overcrowding, understaffing, and minimal financing.
Nationwide survey of prisons exposed inadequacies.
Alexander Maconochie urged adoption of the mark system where penalties would be graded according to crime and release would be based on good behavior.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Reformatory Movement (2 of 5)
Cincinnati, 1870
Prison operations should stem from a philosophy of incarcerated individual change, with reformation rewarded by release.
Indeterminate length sentences replaced by fixed sentences.
Reformation, rather than lapse of time, necessary for incarcerated individual’s release.
Individuals such as Gaylord Hubbell and Enoch Wines were motivated by human concerns and paved the way for reform
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Learning Objective 3: Discuss the elements of the Cincinnati Declaration.
15
The Reformatory Movement (3 of 5)
Cincinnati, 1870
Classification of incarcerated individuals on the basis of character and improvement.
Penitentiary practices of fixed sentences, the lockstep, rules of silence, and isolation seen as debasing and humiliating.
The Cincinnati declaration insisted that “reformation is a work of time,” and that for the protection of society reformations need to be long enough for the reformatory process to take effect.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Reformatory Movement (4 of 5)
Elmira Reformatory
Zebulon Brockway was superintendent of first reformatory at Elmira, New York
Believed that diagnosis and treatment were the keys to reform and rehabilitation
Wanted to identify the “root causes” of the accused individual’s deviance
Designed for first-time felon accused individuals between ages of 16 and 30
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Reformatory Movement (5 of 5)
Lasting Reforms
Indeterminate sentencing
Inmate classification
Rehabilitative programs
Parole
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Rise of the Progressives (1 of 4)
Progressives
Early 1900s–1960
Attacked the excesses of big business and placed their faith in state action to deal with the social problems of slums, adulterated food, dangerous occupational conditions, vice, and crime
Mostly came from upper-class backgrounds
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Learning Objective 4: Identify the reforms advocated by the Progressives.
19
The Rise of the Progressives (2 of 4)
Individualized Treatment and the Positivist School
Two words that describe this positivist school of thought: conscience and convenience
A benevolent set of men and women sought to understand crime, case by case
Need to know life history of each accused individual and then devise a treatment program specific to that individual
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Rise of the Progressives (3 of 4)
Positivist School Assumptions
Criminal behavior is not the result of free will but stems from factors over which the individual has no control:
Biological characteristics
Psychological maladjustments
Sociological conditions
Accused individuals can be treated so that they can lead crime-free lives.
Treatment must center on the individual and the individual’s adjustment.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Rise of the Progressives (4 of 4)
Progressive Reforms
Probation
Recognized individual differences and allowed accused individuals to be treated in the community under supervision.
Indeterminate Sentences
Minimum and maximum terms, within which the correctional process of rehabilitation could operate.
Parole
Caught on in the United States in 1920; during that time period, 80% of accused individuals who left prison were placed on parole.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Rise of the Medical Model (1 of 2)
Medical Model
Assumption that criminal behavior is caused by social, psychological, or biological deficiencies that require treatment.
1929
Congress authorized the Federal Bureau of Prisons to develop institutions to ensure proper classification, care, and treatment of incarcerated individuals.
Stanford Bates was the first director of the Bureau and pushed forth the medical model.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Learning Objective 5: Discuss the assumptions of the medical model regarding the nature of criminal behavior and its correction.
23
Discussion Question (2 of 2)
Do you agree with the underlying assumption of the medical model of corrections that criminal behavior is caused by social, psychological, or biological deficiencies?
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Rise of the Medical Model (2 of 2)
1950s came to be known as the Era of Treatment. California, New Jersey, New York, and Illinois began to heavily implement reforms.
Prisons were to become something like mental hospitals that would rehabilitate and test the incarcerated individual for readiness to reenter society.
Departments of Prisons became Departments of Corrections and added diagnoses and mental health care to their objectives.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
From Medical Model to Community Model (1 of 2)
Social and political values of 1960s and 1970s:
Civil rights movement
War on poverty
Resistance to the Vietnam War
Americans challenged government institutions dealing with:
Education
Mental health
Juvenile delinquency
Adult corrections
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Learning Objective 6: Illustrate how the community model reflected the social and political values of the 1960s and 1970s.
26
From Medical Model to Community Model (2 of 2)
Community corrections
Reintegrating the accused individual into the community should be the goal of the criminal justice system.
Corrections should turn away from psychological care and turn to programs that would increase accused individuals’ success upon leaving the institution.
Attica prison riot
Officials urged to make decarceration through community corrections the goal and make greater use of alternatives such as:
Probation
Halfway houses
Community service
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Crime Control Model: The Pendulum Swings Again (1 of 2)
The Decline of Rehabilitation
Proponents called for longer sentences, especially for those individuals repeatedly accused and those accused of violence offenses
Robert Martinson’s “Nothing Works” report
Also challenged unwarranted amount of discretion given to correctional decision makers, particularly that of the parole board
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Learning Objective 7: Describe the forces and events that led to the present crime control
28
The Crime Control Model: The Pendulum Swings Again (2 of 2)
The Emergence of Crime Control
Political climate change in 1970s and 1980s
Crime rate at historic levels
Response by legislators, judges, criminal justice officials
By 1980, crime and punishment became intense subject for ideological conflict, partisan politics, and legislative action
A more punitive ethos during that time (1980s and 1990s) also influenced its return
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Where Are We Today?
It would be a good time for us as a society to reexamine correctional policy.
For the first time in decades, the costs of the retributive crime control policy of the 1990s are being scrutinized.
Are we safer today than before?
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.