revise a paper + writing

profilee201611
Alyami_Abdulaziz_hand_hygiene_in_radiology_department.docx

Running head: HAND HYGIENE IN RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT 1

HAND HYGIEN IN RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT 2

Hand hygiene in radiology department

Abdulaziz Alyami

Thomas Jefferson University

Jefferson College of Health Professions

Colleen Dempsey

8th December 2018

Hand hygiene in radiology department

Research Capstone

Systematic Review

Yes, there is a systematic review of the topic already exists. Systematic review tends to be different from a literature review as it integrates both the published and unpublished literature. Therefore, with regards to the topic, there are great insights due to the significant literature that is available and literature that is not biased. Thus, some sources will critically selectively analyze the research evidence and significantly contributes to the research topic by using profound methodologies. This means that studies have integrated both qualitative and quantitative systematic reviews concerning hand hygiene in the department of radiology and draw valid comparisons.

Topic narrow or broad

The research topic is neither too narrow nor too broad. This is because there are significant sources that can provide information with regards to the research topic. Taking a critical analysis of the research topic, it is a subtopic that is instead of settling on the Importance of hand washing in healthcare, the topic has been further broken down into something manageable. Furthermore, as much as the research topic will provide significant insights into the field of healthcare, it focuses on a specific audience, that is the Radiology department.

There is high importance when it comes to observing hand hygiene during radiology exercises since you will find that the patients may acquire contaminations during the process. Also, hand hygiene helps in disinfecting the possible infections that may have been present in the working environment as well as prevent nosocomial infections from spreading. In consideration of high tendencies of contacts between the doctors who attends to several patients may lead to spread of infections and it is important for the technologists of radiology to observe general cleaning including hand washing.

Can wearing gloves within the Radiology Department be a substitute for hand washing?

Wearing gloves also helps in reducing the spread of infections but to be more effective hand hygiene is important because you find that for the doctor or the radiology technician to wear those gloves he or she needs to touch using the hand during wearing them.

Furthermore, caregivers are the ones who are close to the patients from time to time. And since there are many activities the caregivers attend to, hand hygiene is so paramount in curbing the spread of infections to the patients that may have been conducted from outside activities.

Research question

What is the perspective of those receiving health care services in the Radiology Department with regards to hand washing?

Purpose statement

Purpose of the research is to reach out to both the caregivers and healthcare practitioners within the Radiology Department. This is so because many of the individuals within this department tend to overlook the importance of hand washing which is very critical. Therefore, this is one of the important infections control strategies that can help radiology departments.

Why systematic review is important

A systematic review is critical as it helps to come up with findings that are profound and free of bias. The implication here is that systematic review acts as a filter for the different evidence that has been put forward, by other researchers. The rigorous evaluation of existing literature will further help in gaining practical insights with regards to the research topic (Droogan & Song, 1996). Therefore, undertaking a systematic review of the topic will help in evaluating the evidence of the research and will furthermore form the basis for decision making because of informed findings.

The need for systematic review is to encourage evidence-based practice. Healthcare and specifically the radiology department need to come up with a practice that is based on plausible knowledge on hand hygiene so as to add value to individual experiences and intensify the service provisions in the hospitals. Therefore, there is a need to inform the practice and also ensure that the findings of the research are empirical and this calls for a systematic review.

There is the significance of undertaking a systematic review. There is an ethical consideration when individuals undertake research especially with regards to the healthcare field. A systematic review is, therefore, one of the ethical considerations when conducting research. This is because there is the creation of policies that might affect many people, and thus the decisions that individuals make need to be informed decisions, and this will only be achieved through the systematic review genre.

Aims and objectives

The objective of the research is to come up with findings that significantly influence the decision-making process within the radiology department. In this case, the study aims at providing practical insights in regard to possible nosocomial infections that radiologists and the patients might be exposed. This means that they need to be capable of both being aware of the danger and furthermore how hand washing protects against this dangers.

It is important to have sustainable hygiene development programs and practices in the radiology department especially observing hand hygiene as one of the paramount component towards reduction of possible spreading of infections. General cleaning of the environment where radiological activities are conducted is also helpful to patients to have humble environment during the acquisition of medications.

References

SOFAER, N., & STRECH, D. (2011). THE NEED FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF REASONS. Bioethics, 26(6), 315-328. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01858.x

Droogan, J., & Song, F. (1996). The process and importance of systematic reviews. Nurse Researcher, 4(1), 15-26. doi: 10.7748/nr.4.1.15.s3