SPEECH
zezezeze
ALS165SmartCitiesPresentationRubric.docx
ALS 165 Listening and Speaking Smart Cities Presentation
Group Member: _________________________
Passing Scores Not Passing Scores
|
INDIVIDUAL PRESENTATION SCORE |
Excellent: Student successfully meets the criteria.
|
Good: Student mostly meets the criteria – errors are minor. |
Below average: Student struggles to meet criteria – many errors. |
Needs Improvement: Student did not meet the criteria.
|
Instructor notes: |
|
|
25-22.5 pts. |
22-20 pts. |
19-15 pts. |
14-0 pts. |
|
|
Presentation Content : Meets all requirements. Main points are all mentioned and explained clearly. · main points are well explained · opinion is well supported and demonstrates critical thinking · Two academic sources cited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presentation Language Use: · Effective use of grammar and vocabulary. · Good control of basic and complex vocabulary/structure. Some minor errors are noticeable, but do not affect meaning. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15-13.5 pts. |
13-12.5 pts. |
12-9 pts.. |
8-0 pts. |
|
|
Presentation Organization: · within time limit (+/- 15 seconds). · varied, accurate transitions advanced organization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presentation Delivery: Consistent eye contact; appropriate volume, constantly facing audience; effective body language; rare reliance on notes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pronunciation/fluency: Key words clearly pronounced; effective intonation, stress, pace; minimal hesitations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-4.5 pts. |
4 pts. |
3.5-3 pts. |
2.5 – 0 pts. |
|
|
Group Participation: Excellent group cohesiveness; effective visual aides.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: Score: ____________X2 = ____________/200
