JOURNAL

AllJournalrubrics.docx

Name: NURS_6551_Week7_Application_Part2_Rubric

Satisfactory

Unsatisfactory

Quality of Work Submitted: The extend of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.

Points:

Points Range: 26 (26%) - 30 (30%)

Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 25 (25%)

Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

Feedback:

Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.

Points:

Points Range: 4 (4%) - 5 (5%)

Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

No purpose statement was provided.

Feedback:

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student's ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment's key concepts.

Points:

Points Range: 8 (8%) - 10 (10%)

Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 7 (7%)

Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

Feedback:

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student's ability to: Apply and integrate material in course rsources (i.e. video, required readings, and textook) and credible outside resources.

Points:

Points Range: 16 (16%) - 20 (20%)

Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 15 (15%)

Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view.

Feedback:

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student's ability to: Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.

Points:

Points Range: 16 (16%) - 20 (20%)

Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 15 (15%)

Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

Points:

Points Range: 4 (4%) - 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.

Feedback:

"Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation"

Points:

Points Range: 3 (3%) - 5 (5%)

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Feedback:

"Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list."

Points:

Points Range: 3 (3%) - 5 (5%)

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Quality of Work Submitted: The extend of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.--

Levels of Achievement:

Satisfactory 26 (26%) - 30 (30%)

Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) - 25 (25%)

Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

Feedback:

Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.--

Levels of Achievement:

Satisfactory 4 (4%) - 5 (5%)

Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

No purpose statement was provided.

Feedback:

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student's ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment's key concepts.--

Levels of Achievement:

Satisfactory 8 (8%) - 10 (10%)

Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.

Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) - 7 (7%)

Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

Feedback:

Levels of Achievement:

Satisfactory 16 (16%) - 20 (20%)

Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.

Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) - 15 (15%)

Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view.

Feedback:

Levels of Achievement:

Satisfactory 16 (16%) - 20 (20%)

Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.

Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) - 15 (15%)

Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.

Feedback:

Levels of Achievement:

Satisfactory 4 (4%) - 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.

Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.

Feedback:

"Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation"--

Levels of Achievement:

Satisfactory 3 (3%) - 5 (5%)

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) - 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Feedback:

Levels of Achievement:

Satisfactory 3 (3%) - 5 (5%)

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) - 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Feedback:

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6551_Week7_Application_Part2_Rubric

%7B%220.04000

%7B%220.00000

%7B%220.03000

%7B%220.00000

%7B%220.03000

%7B%220.00000

%7B%220.04000

%7B%220.00000

%7B%220.08000

%7B%220.00000

%7B%220.16000

%7B%220.00000

%7B%220.16000

%7B%220.00000

%7B%220.04000

%7B%220.00000

%7B%220.03000

%7B%220.00000

Exit

%7B%220.03000

%7B%220.00000

%7B%220.26000

%7B%220.00000

%7B%220.04000

%7B%220.26000

%7B%220.00000

%7B%220.08000

%7B%220.00000

%7B%220.16000

%7B%220.00000

%7B%220.16000

%7B%220.00000