read the instruction of the file.
Academic English Skills Coursework 1 Assessment Brief (UG)
|
What |
|
|
Coursework 1: In this assessment, you will: - select an essay title related to your subject of study. - be given a source to start your reading for the essay. - find five additional reliable sources related to your essay and add them to a reference list using an appropriate referencing format. - outline how three sources are relevant to your essay and detail how you found the source (eg. via Google Scholar, the University library, from a reading list, following up on a reference in another article) and determined it was useful. - complete the table for two sources, outlining how you have identified each source as reliable. - identify three main points which are useful from each of the two sources, and the supporting evidence provided. - note the part of the essay for which the points are useful. - note the conclusions you have drawn from your reading of the five texts on the topic.
This coursework is the first stage of your coursework portfolio. You will be required to present and answer questions on your research in CW 2, and write a research-based essay of 1500 words in CW 3. There is no word limit for CW 1. You can write in note-form, as you are not marked for the accuracy of your language, but you must use your own words. You cannot demonstrate your understanding of the sources you have read if you copy from the text. |
|
|
Why |
|
|
CW 1 tests your ability to research and plan an extended research essay by: - analysing an essay title and answering it with relevant points and ideas. - finding useful, credible academic sources to inform your ideas in answering the question. - reading and identifying relevant information for your essay. - identifying the main points and supporting evidence in sources. - draw conclusions from your reading. - integrating your own ideas with ideas from your sources. - discussing your conclusions in a tutorial. This assessment counts for 40% of your final mark for reading. |
|
|
When |
|
|
Stage 1) w/b 12th April: Complete the CW 1 planning document and show it to your tutor for approval. This ensures you have understood the requirements of the essay question correctly, and that your choice of sources is appropriate before you go any further. Stage 2) w/b 26th April: Go through the CW 1 Checklist to make sure you have completed the assessment fully and correctly, and submit the draft of your source report. Stage 3) w/b 10th May: Your tutor will provide feedback on your draft in a tutorial. Make notes of your tutor’s comments. Your tutor will advise you on whether your submission is acceptable as a piece of academic work, or if further work is needed. You will also be asked in the tutorial to talk through your research so far and show the sources you have found. Stage 4) w/b 24th May: Submit your CW 1. |
|
|
How |
|
|
Your work is submitted and marked electronically. Your tutor will give you the marking criteria and samples of student submissions so that you can see how the assessment is marked. Your work will automatically be checked by similarity software (Turnitin) to make sure you have submitted work in your own words. You may be able to submit your work ahead of the submission deadline in order to check the similarity score. |
|
|
What if… |
|
|
I don’t choose relevant or reliable sources? |
- Your tutor will check your sources before you write your first draft. Make sure you have used the best source of information (if you find some interesting data reported in a newspaper, follow up on the original source, rather than just citing the newspaper). - Use the sources you are given as a starting point; follow up on references mentioned in the texts, consult reading lists for your subject and ask in the library for help finding relevant material. |
|
my similarity score on Turnitin is high? |
First, check your similarity report. Any wording on the template will be picked up as plagiarism, so your tutor will not count that. Check whether chunks of your writing have been highlighted in the report; this indicates you have not paraphrased effectively. Poor paraphrasing is a form of plagiarism, and will result in your work being reported for academic misconduct. You should therefore revise your work and resubmit it before the assessment deadline. This assessment requires you to identify and summarise key points from the text in your own words; you should not just use direct quotations from sources in this assessment. You can find further information on the Academic Misconduct process in your Student Handbook. |
|
I submit the coursework late? |
If you submit an assessment late, a penalty will be applied to your final mark. The penalties for late submission are outlined in your Student Handbook. |
|
I don’t pass CW 1? |
You must submit a draft of CW 1 so that your tutor can provide you with feedback to improve your work before you submit it. Failure to submit a draft will result in 10% penalty at the final submission stage. You will need a minimum score for your overall reading mark in order to meet your progression requirements. If you score below 40% on CW 1, you may be required to resubmit at the end of the module. If you are awarded zero due to Academic Misconduct (ie. you have submitted work which is not your own), you may be given a new essay title to research and plan. |
|
I don’t submit CW 1? |
You should complete all three components of the module in order to demonstrate that you have met all the learning outcomes. Your final mark may be withheld if your assessments are incomplete. You can still pass the reading component even if you failed CW1 (below 40%) as long as the average between CW1 and the reading exam is above the progression requirement for your pathway. If you are unable to submit CW 1 by the deadline, you will need to apply for mitigating circumstances. Further information on mitigating circumstances can be found in your student handbook. You will have a chance to resit CW1 at the end of the programme. |
|
I miss part of CW 1? |
If you only submit part of CW 1 (you complete the first two annotated references, but not the source evaluation part, for example) your work will be penalised according to the marking criteria. In this example, you would be awarded zero for Source Evaluation and Use of Sources, and Processing Text and a low score for demonstrating your knowledge. |
|
Can I… |
|
|
choose the same title as someone else in my class? |
Yes. You can choose the same title as other students, but you must not work together, as this is collusion, a form of academic misconduct. The work you submit must be your own. |
|
use sources that I am reading for my subject? |
Yes. You should not submit the same assessment for two modules, as this is academic misconduct, but you are able to use material you are reading in your subject module in the AES Coursework. |
|
not use the source I am given? |
Yes. You do not have to use the source you are given; but it is recommended as a starting point on the topic. If you find better sources of information for the purposes of your essay, use those. You will, however, have to do more work if you don’t use the given source. |
How to complete the CW 1 Planning document
You need to complete the planning document to show your tutor like this:
Essay title or question:
|
Title: Critics depict zoos as animal prisons where animals are exploited for entertainment. Discuss the impacts of captivity and human interaction on animal behaviour and welfare. To what extent are the concerns upheld by the scientific community? Add the key question words from your title and what they refer to – this shows you have understood the question correctly. |
|
Approach verbs |
Ideas to be explored |
|
Discuss
|
How are animals affected by living in zoos? What are the benefits and drawbacks? Does it make a difference if animals are born in captivity? |
|
To what extent |
How far are the claims that zoos do not prioritise animal welfare and conservation valid? |
You can write in note form, but make sure it is clear what the key points / arguments you are going to cover are.
|
- Who are the critics? Are they scientists?
- What are the main criticisms of zoos? What is the evidence base for the criticisms?
- What are the main effects on animals in captivity in terms of the space they live in? Is it dependent on the animal or the environment?
- What are the main effects on animals in captivity of human interaction? Does human presence bother animals in the same way? What is the issue – noise? smell? physical contact?
- Are there issues when animals are in captivity and then are put back into the wild?
- Have zoos done anything to improve conditions and respond to criticisms? Is there evidence that the measures have been effective?
- What are the positives of zoos / captivity? Conservation / education. Would animals be negatively affected if there were no zoos?
You don’t need to decide what your position is yet; this will be informed by your reading, but if your title asks for a position, you should show that you plan to include it.
|
How to complete the AES Coursework 1: Source Report
|
Name:
|
Class: |
Date:
|
Essay title or question:
|
Title: Critics depict zoos as animal prisons where animals are exploited for entertainment. Discuss the impacts of captivity and human interaction on animal behaviour and welfare. To what extent are the concerns upheld by the scientific community?
|
State the purpose of each paragraph – make sure it is clear how it will add / develop your overall argument.
Plan for overall structure of essay:
|
Plan for overall structure |
|
Introduction – context and position: While there are concerns around animal welfare, zoos perform a significant role in both in conservation and education. |
|
Thesis statement: The scientific community are working at a national and global level to mitigate the negative impacts of captivity on animal welfare. |
|
P1. Background: The aims / purpose of zoos |
|
P2. Conservation and Species Protection - the role of zoos |
|
P3. Key issues and concerns related to animal welfare – overview of complexity of the issue |
|
P4. The effect of human visitors on animal behaviour – effect on animal welfare / behaviour and if negative effects can be mitigated |
|
P5. Physical Space and Exhibits – effect on animal welfare / behaviour and if negative effects can be mitigated |
|
Conclusion |
Add more paragraphs to the template if you need them.
Use the following referencing format for your sources:
|
Books / chapters of books: |
|
Surname, I. and Surname, I. (Year) Title of the book Place of Publication: Publisher Surname, I. (Year) ‘Chapter of the book’ In: I. Surname & I. Surname (Eds) Title of the book Place of Publication: Publisher pp.1 - 18
|
|
Journal articles (print/ online) |
|
Surname, I. (Year) ‘The Title of the Article’ The Name of the Journal 1 (1), pp. 1- 18
|
|
Reports / articles online |
|
Surname, I. (Year) ‘The Title of the Article or Report’ [Online] The Name of the Organisation or website. Available at: url [Last Accessed 23.07.19]
|
Part 1: List of relevant sources
List a minimum of 5 sources which will be useful in answering your essay question, and are suitable for academic use.
Make sure you order your references alphabetically, and use the format outlined on page 1.
|
Conde, D. A., Flesness, N., Colchero, F., Jones, O. R., & Scheuerlein, A. (2011) ‘An emerging role of zoos to conserve biodiversity’. Science, 331(6023), 1390-1391
Conway, W. G. (2011) ‘Buying time for wild animals with zoos’ Zoo Biology, 30(1), 1-8
Fernandez, E.J., Tamborski, M.A., Pickens, S.R. and Timberlake, W. (2009) ‘Animal–visitor interactions in the modern zoo: Conflicts and interventions’, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 120 (1-2), pp.1-8
Hosey, G., Melfi, V. and Pankhurst, S. (2009) Zoo animals: Behaviour, Management and Welfare. Oxford University Press, New York (USA)
Melfi, V. A. (2009) ‘There are big gaps in our knowledge, and thus approach, to zoo animal welfare: a case for evidence‐based zoo animal management’, Zoo Biology: Published in affiliation with the American Zoo and Aquarium Association, 28 (6), pp.574-588.
Paul-Murphy, J., & Molter, C. (2019) ‘Overview of Animal Welfare in Zoos’, In: R. Miller & P.Calle (Eds) Fowler's Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine Current Therapy Volume 9, Elsevier: Missouri, pp. 64-72
Quadros et.al. (2014) ‘Zoo visitor effect on mammal behaviour: Does noise matter?’ Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 156, pp.78-84.
Salas, M. & Manteca, X. (2017) ‘Visitor Effect on Zoo Animals’ Zoo Animal Welfare Education Centre Factsheet. [Online] Available at: https://www.zawec.org/en/fact-sheets/111-visitor-effect-on-zoo-animals [Last Accessed 7.06.20]
|
Part 2: Relevance of sources
In part 3, you will look in detail at three of the sources you have selected and how you will use them in your essay. Complete this part for the three other sources you have selected. Please use your own words.
12
Part 3: Summarise and paraphrase key information in the text in order to demonstrate that you have understood the sources. You may use bullet points. You are not marked for your language accuracy, but you will be penalised for copying text from the source. Poor paraphrasing is a form of plagiarism, and will result in your work being reported for academic misconduct.
Source 4
|
Type of source: Journal |
Reference: Fernandez, E.J., Tamborski, M.A., Pickens, S.R. and Timberlake, W. (2009) ‘Animal–visitor interactions in the modern zoo: Conflicts and interventions’, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 120 (1-2), pp.1-8 |
|
|
I have identified this source is reliable and appropriate for academic use because… |
||
|
Criteria |
Tick all statements which apply and provide an example or evidence where required |
|
|
Currency The timeliness of the information
|
☐The article is current ☐Research in the area has not been updated ☒My essay requires reference to older research REASON: This article provides a comprehensive review of research on zoo exhibits, animal behaviour, and the impact of humans on animals in zoos. The article highlights how thinking and approaches to animal welfare have changed over time, and also outlines suggestions for improvements which have been implemented in recent years.
|
|
|
Authority The source of the information
|
☒The authors have the appropriate level of expertise in the field EVIDENCE: Four researchers contributed to this paper; all have worked in various Departments of Psychology or Psychological and Brain Sciences, working with animal behaviour, in both Indiana and Oklahoma Universities. The lead researcher, Eduardo Fernandez, is currently (as of 2020) an animal welfare scientist linked with Florida Institute of Technology.
|
|
|
Accuracy The reliability and correctness of the information |
☒The information has been peer-reviewed ☒The source uses academic conventions throughout ☒The arguments are supported by sound evidence EVIDENCE: The article references academic and scientific research throughout, including previous research from the article’s authors and also studies in animal behaviour which is also cited in other sources.
|
|
|
Purpose The reason the information exists |
☒This source has not been commissioned by a company or organisation ☒The purpose of this source is to inform / educate ☒The information contained in this source is presented without bias EVIDENCE: The article is objective and evaluates both the positive and negative effects of human visitors on animal behaviour.
Your source may be useful for one part of your essay, or several. Note the relevant paragraph from your essay plan and indicate why / how the information is useful. |
|
|
Use of source Note three points from the source which will be useful for your essay and how you will use them |
||
|
Relevant key point from the text |
Supporting evidence / example/ data for the key point |
This point is useful for paragraph… |
|
Modern zoos have five primary goals: animal welfare, conservation, education of the public and entertainment.
Add the page numbers for your evidence as it will help you find it when you are writing your essay. Make sure you note any secondary citations so that you can reference accurately later.
|
- p2 -The majority of visitors come for entertainment (Altman, 1998; Reade & Waren, 1996) but without the element of entertainment, zoos would be unable to achieve their other goals. The entertainment factor is essential in generating income and raising awareness of conservation. - p4 - Anderson et al. (2003); Hosey (2005) – entertainment ensures that visitors visit zoos repeatedly – this generates revenue for conservation and animal care. - p2 - Anderson et al. (2003); Hosey (2005) – study shows time people spend with animals leads to positive perceptions of animals, which leads to an increased support for conservation projects. |
P1. Background: The aims / purpose of zoos This information is useful as it highlights that while welfare is a goal of zoos, entertainment is essential in making sure zoos have the money to support this.
|
|
Visitor effects on animals: Noisy crowds negatively affect animal behaviour: measured by changes in behaviour and physiology. |
Changes in behaviour: · p5 - Mallapur & Chellam (2002) - Leopards increased ‘pacing’ when the zoo was extremely busy. Interpreted as an attempt to maintain distance from visitors, possible attempt to escape. · p5 - Birke (2002) - Orangutans covered their heads with paper sacks and infants held onto their mothers significantly more with large group of visitors · p5 - Chamove et al. (1988) - Tamarins, Diana monkeys, ring-tailed lemurs and mandrills - increase in aggression and a decrease in grooming, inactivity when visitors were present. Changes in physiology: Note if the source is useful for supporting an argument / presenting a counter-argument / providing data or examples. · p5 - Davis et al, (2005) Spider Monkeys - measure stress by via urinary cortisol levels indicates positive correlation between cortisol levels and visitor numbers |
P4. The effect of human visitors on animal behaviour – effect on animal welfare / behaviour and if negative effects can be mitigated This information is useful as it provides specific examples of how animal behaviour changes in zoos.
|
|
Modifying animals’ living space / interaction with visitors can mitigate some of the negative effects of human presence. |
- Most studies suggest that zoo visitors produce stress, but Margulis et al. (2003); Nimon & Dalziel (1992) suggest that animals may adjust and become accustomed to zoo visitors.as expected.p6- Anderson et al. (2002); Davis et al. (2005) - Exhibits design to be ‘naturalistic’ and provide retreats to give the animals some control in stressful situations. - p5 - Anderson et al. (2002) - African pygmy goats and Romanov sheep - an increase in ‘petting zoo’ visitors led to aggressive and escape behaviour as the animals found it difficult to form distance from humans. When a retreat space was provided, undesirable behaviours were reduced. - p6 - Blaney Wells (2004); Wells (2005) - Gorillas - less aggressive and less abnormal behaviour when camouflage netting was installed. |
P5. Physical Space and Exhibits – effect on animal welfare / behaviour and if negative effects can be mitigated This information is useful as it provides evidence through examples that changes to physical space can help improve animal behaviour.
|
Source 5
|
Type of source: Book |
Reference: Paul-Murphy, J., & Molter, C. (2019) ‘Overview of Animal Welfare in Zoos’, In: R. Miller & P.Calle (Eds) Fowler's Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine Current Therapy Volume 9, Elsevier: Missouri, pp. 64-72. |
|
|
I have identified this source is reliable and appropriate for academic use because… |
||
|
Criteria |
Tick all statements which apply and provide an example or evidence where required |
|
|
Currency The timeliness of the information
|
☒The article is current ☐Research in the area has not been updated ☐My essay requires reference to older research REASON: The article was published in 2019 and refers to many changes in zoo and conservation management that have happened very recently. All the data used in the source is from within the past 10 years.
|
|
|
Authority The source of the information
|
☒The authors have the appropriate level of expertise in the field EVIDENCE: The authors are reputable researchers and professors at the University of California working in the field of veterinary medicine. |
|
|
Accuracy The reliability and correctness of the information
|
☐The information has been peer-reviewed ☒The source uses academic conventions throughout ☒The arguments are supported by sound evidence EVIDENCE: The article cites a sources and data throughout to support its claims. It also refers to government guidelines and regulations from around the world which can be verified on government websites.
|
|
|
Purpose The reason the information exists |
☒This source has not been commissioned by a company or organisation ☒The purpose of this source is to inform / educate ☒The information contained in this source is presented without bias EVIDENCE: The purpose of the article is to give an overview of what animal welfare means. It also discusses how this is assessed in zoos along with the principles and guidelines that those who work in zoos follow.
|
|
|
Use of source Note three points from the source which will be useful for your essay and how you will use them |
||
|
Relevant key point from the text |
Supporting evidence / example/ data for the key point |
Use of source |
|
A key issue around the discussion of animal welfare is the lack of an international standard, and also disparity between the needs of different animals; this makes the establishment of a ‘standard’ problematic. |
- Duncan (1981) – A new perspective of animal welfare is that welfare refers to a characteristic of the individual animal. - Hill & Broom (2009); Koene (2013) - Animals in zoos come from a variety of backgrounds, with differing life experiences and ability to reaction to challenges. For example, an animal that stays in zoos its whole life and one that is temporarily resident until reintroduced to the wild require different skills or another example of an animal brought into an urban zoo from a semi-free-ranging facility or vice versa.
|
P3. Key issues and concerns related to animal welfare – overview of complexity of the issue This information is useful as it provides reasons why the issue is complex.
|
|
Efforts have been made to establish a system of measuring animal welfare in captivity: ‘animal-based’ and ‘resource-based’ (Blokhuis 2008). |
- p3 - Blokhuis (2008) - ‘Animal-based welfare’ focuses on the physical, behavioural, and mental state of the animals and is measured from the animals’ perspectives, which can be scientifically challenging i.e. mental state. ‘Resource-based welfare’ focuses on natural history such as the amount of space, temperature, diet, and veterinary care.
- Maslow’s hierarchy addressed Animal Rights and results in an animal retaining and encouraging natural abilities. The foundations for survival include physiologic needs for shelter, water, and hygiene. Followed by the animals’ physical health and safety needs. Finally, welfare-related activities, such as social needs, mental stimulation, and choice. www.waza.org/en/site/home p.4
|
P3. Key issues and concerns related to animal welfare – overview of complexity of the issue This information is useful as it explains what is being done to address the issue. |
|
One approach to addressing animal welfare is designing animals spaces based on species.
|
· p3 - Kagan & Veasey (2010) – ‘Exhibit design’ must be species-specific, incorporate appropriate space; environmental enrichment, natural exercise and social interactions with other animals in the location. As outlined in Blokhuis (2008) resource based welfare. · p5 - Kagan & Veasey (2010) – A priority for the welfare of an animal in captivity is that the animal should be able to perform and behave as they would in a natural environment / the wild. · p1 - Mench & Kreger (1996) - It is the responsibility of the zoo to demonstrate a current and up to date knowledge of animals’ needs by providing a suitable environment.
|
P5. Physical Space and Exhibits – effect on animal welfare / behaviour and if negative effects can be mitigated This information is useful as outlines a possible solution to welfare concerns. |
Part 4
|
Conclusions drawn from your reading |
|
· There are valid criticisms of zoos – particularly in countries where regulation is weak or unclear, but there is evidence that many zoos have invested research and resources into mitigating against welfare issues. · Research suggests that there are significant benefits to animal conservation through being kept in captivity. · The scientific community are very aware of the challenges presented by keeping animals in captivity and are working collaboratively to find solutions. There is evidence that the situation it is improving all the time due to growing awareness of animal needs and support for conservation projects.
|
How CW 1 is marked
|
Mark |
Source Selection a) Number and credibility of sources b) Relevance of sources to title |
Source Evaluation and Use of Sources a) Evaluation of sources b) Use of sources |
Processing text a) Identification of key relevant points in the text. b) Identification of relevant supporting evidence provided in the text. |
Research and Understanding a) Evidence of ability to research b) Evidence of subject knowledge |
|
8 – 10 Distinction |
a) All five sources included are reliable and appropriate for academic purposes. b) Relevance of all texts to the research topic and title is made explicit and is clear. |
a) Clear and sound evaluation of the reliability of all sources provided. b) Clear indication of how all sources will be used in the essay; sources appropriate to support points outlined in essay plan. |
a) Demonstrates ability to identify relevant main lines of argument in all three academic texts. b) Produces effective notes on relevant supporting ideas and details.
|
a) Clear evidence of ability to find relevant and reliable sources demonstrated; effective search methods used and fully outlined. b) Demonstrates thorough understanding and coverage of the relevant material and issues. |
|
6 – 7 Merit |
a) Reliable sources selected overall; one source may be of lower quality. b) The relevance of the texts to the research topic and title is made clear. |
a) Sound evaluation of the reliability of sources; reasoning and detail may be clearer for some sources than others. b) Clear indication of how most of the sources will be used in the essay; sources appropriate to support points. |
a) Demonstrates ability to identify relevant main lines of argument in academic texts with the majority of points selected. b) Provides mostly clear supporting information relevant to the main points in a text.
|
a) Evidence of ability to find relevant and reliable sources demonstrated; effective search methods used and outlined. b) Demonstrates good understanding and coverage of the relevant material and issues.
|
|
4 – 5 Pass |
a) Acceptable sources selected; two sources may be of lower quality / lack currency. b) Texts are relevant to the research topic and title, though link may be less clear in places. |
a) Evaluation of the reliability of the sources present, but provides minimal detail which is weak, faulty or repetitive in some areas. b) Indication of how sources will be used in the essay is generally clear, but may lack detail or relevance in places. |
a) Demonstrates some ability to identify main lines of argument in an academic text; a number of points are less clear and/or less relevant than others. May lack detail. b) Distinguishes supporting details from main points although some supporting evidence may be less clear or relevant. |
a) Some evidence of ability to find relevant and reliable sources demonstrated; more than one search method has been used. b) Demonstrates general knowledge and coverage of some areas but need development. |
|
2 – 3 Below pass
|
a) Predominantly poor and/or inappropriate material selected with selection appearing to be random. b) Texts are only generally linked to the topic; the relevance to the title is unclear. |
a) Weak / faulty evaluation of the reliability of the sources. b) Largely unclear how sources will be used to support points in the research essay. |
a) Demonstrates limited ability to identify main lines of argument in an academic text; main points are missing, unclear, repetitive or lifted. b) Attempt to provide supporting information for main points, but largely unclear or repetitive; points are lifted from texts. |
a) Lacking evidence of ability to find relevant and reliable source; search method is unclear, inappropriate or repetitive. b) Demonstrates little or confused understanding of content; student has simply lifted text and / or has only covered one aspect of the title. |
|
0 – 1 Fail |
a) Poor and/or inappropriate literature/material selected; required number of sources not included. b) Texts are unconnected – no obvious focus for the reading. |
a) No attempt to evaluate the reliability of sources. b) Unclear why sources have been selected, and how they will be used in the essay. |
a) Does not demonstrate the ability to identify main ideas from an academic text – either academic texts are not used, points are unclear, or are completely lifted. b) No attempt to provide supporting information; information is missing, irrelevant or inappropriate. |
a) No evidence of ability to find relevant and reliable sources demonstrated. b) Demonstrates no discernible knowledge or understanding. |
Score Conversion
|
Raw score |
40 |
39 |
38 |
37 |
36 |
35 |
34 |
33 |
32 |
31 |
30 |
29 |
28 |
27 |
26 |
25 |
24 |
23 |
|
|
Mark |
100% |
98% |
95% |
93% |
90% |
88% |
85% |
83% |
80% |
78% |
75% |
73% |
70% |
68% |
65% |
63% |
60% |
58% |
|
|
Raw Score |
22 |
21 |
20 |
19 |
18 |
17 |
16 |
15 |
14 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
10 |
9 |
8 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
<4 |
|
Mark |
55% |
53% |
50% |
48% |
45% |
43% |
40% |
38% |
35% |
33% |
30% |
28% |
25% |
23% |
20% |
18% |
15% |
13% |
0 |
You are awarded the top mark for the band if both criteria is met, the lower mark if one criterion is met or if the quality is variable. Where you are awarded non-adjacent bands for the two points of one criteria (eg. Distinction for criteria a), Pass for criteria b) , the mid-point score is awarded. Note that the mark for Processing Text and Understanding is capped at 3 if the majority of points are lifted from the text. Your mark may be capped for either main points, supporting evidence, or both. Your score will automatically be capped for Understanding if you lift points, as you have not demonstrated you have understood what you have read
5