ENGLISH 1O1: advocacy text final submission
Cooper2021
AdvocacyTextRubric.docxAdvocacy Text Rubric
|
Advocacy Text Rubric |
||||||||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
||||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGenre awareness and design |
|
5 pts |
||||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegrate relevant content |
|
5 pts |
||||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegrate credible and relevant evidence |
|
5 pts |
||||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetermine a Fitting scope For an argument |
|
5 pts |
||||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcomechoose message elements to fit a rhetorical purpose |
|
5 pts |
||||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcomechoose message elements to fit an intended audience |
|
5 pts |
||||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcomechoose message elements to fit an actual audience |
|
5 pts |
||||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReach an intended audience beyond the instructor and classmates |
|
5 pts |
||||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Register Development write papers with a clear thesis, logical structure, and cohesive, well-developed paragraphs threshold: 3.0 pts |
|
-- |
||||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLanguage and Style write papers with clear, varied, well-constructed sentences, with usage and mechanics conforming to standard edited English threshold: 3.0 pts |
|
-- |
||||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngagement with Writing Process demonstrate an understanding of writing as a complex, recursive process whereby ideas are explored, developed, and communicated to a particular audience for a particular purpose threshold: 3.0 pts |
|
-- |
||||||
|
Total Points: 40 |
Advocacy Text Rubric
Advocacy Text Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This
criterion
is
linked
to
a
Learning
Outcome
Genre
awareness and
design
5
to >
4.0
pts
Exceeding
Strict adherence to
genre/design
expectations were
executed as student
created text
4
to >
3.0
pts
Achieving
Many of the
expected
genre/design
expectations are
executed, based on
student’s chosen text
3
to >
2.0
pts
Progressing
Some or
inconsistent
genre/des
ign
expectations of
student’s chosen
text were applied
2
to >
1.0
pts
Beginning
Few genre/design
expectations of
student’s chosen
text were applied
1
to >
0
pts
Does not Meet
Minimum
Requirements (0
-
1)
No genre/design
expectations of
student’s chosen
text were applied
5
pts
This
criterion
is
linked
to
a
Learning
Outcome
Integrate
relevant content
5
to >
4.0
pts
Exceeding
The text
integrates a
fitting volume
of relevant
content to
serve its
rhetorical
purpose.
4
to >
3.0
pts
Achieving
The text
integrates
relevant
content to
serve its
rhetorical
purpose.
3
to >
2.0
pts
Progressing
The text
integrates
enough relevant
content to
at
least
communicate
its rhetorical
purpose.
2
to >
1.0
pts
Beginning
The text does
not integrate
enough
relevant
content to
communicate
its rhetorical
purpose.
1
to >
0
pts
Does not Meet Minimum
Requirements (0
-
1)
The text does not integrate any relevant
content for its rhetorical purpose
5
pts
This
criterion
is
linked
to
a
Learning
Outcome
Integrate
credible and relevant
evidence
5
to >
4.0
pts
Exceeding
The text
consistently
presents a fitting
volume of both
relevant and
credible
evidence.
4
pts
Achieving
The text
presents many
pieces of both
relevant and
credible
evidence.
4
to >
3.0
pts
Achieving
3
to >
2.0
pts
Progressing
The text
presents a few
pieces of
relevant and
credible
evidence
2
to >
1.0
pts
Beginning
The text presents
a few pieces of
evidence, but the
relevance and
credibility is
unclear
1
to >
0
pts
Does not Meet
Minimum
Requirements (0
-
1)
The text presents
no evid
ence,
credible/relevant
or not
5
pts
Advocacy Text Rubric
Advocacy Text Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is
linked to a Learning
OutcomeGenre
awareness and
design
5 to >4.0 pts
Exceeding
Strict adherence to
genre/design
expectations were
executed as student
created text
4 to >3.0 pts
Achieving
Many of the
expected
genre/design
expectations are
executed, based on
student’s chosen text
3 to >2.0 pts
Progressing
Some or
inconsistent
genre/design
expectations of
student’s chosen
text were applied
2 to >1.0 pts
Beginning
Few genre/design
expectations of
student’s chosen
text were applied
1 to >0 pts
Does not Meet
Minimum
Requirements (0-
1)
No genre/design
expectations of
student’s chosen
text were applied
5 pts
This criterion is
linked to a Learning
OutcomeIntegrate
relevant content
5 to >4.0 pts
Exceeding
The text
integrates a
fitting volume
of relevant
content to
serve its
rhetorical
purpose.
4 to >3.0 pts
Achieving
The text
integrates
relevant
content to
serve its
rhetorical
purpose.
3 to >2.0 pts
Progressing
The text
integrates
enough relevant
content to at
least
communicate
its rhetorical
purpose.
2 to >1.0 pts
Beginning
The text does
not integrate
enough
relevant
content to
communicate
its rhetorical
purpose.
1 to >0 pts
Does not Meet Minimum
Requirements (0-1)
The text does not integrate any relevant
content for its rhetorical purpose
5 pts
This criterion is
linked to a Learning
OutcomeIntegrate
credible and relevant
evidence
5 to >4.0 pts
Exceeding
The text
consistently
presents a fitting
volume of both
relevant and
credible
evidence.
4 pts
Achieving
The text
presents many
pieces of both
relevant and
credible
evidence.
4 to >3.0 pts
Achieving
3 to >2.0 pts
Progressing
The text
presents a few
pieces of
relevant and
credible
evidence
2 to >1.0 pts
Beginning
The text presents
a few pieces of
evidence, but the
relevance and
credibility is
unclear
1 to >0 pts
Does not Meet
Minimum
Requirements (0-
1)
The text presents
no evidence,
credible/relevant
or not
5 pts
