Advocacy Project
|
Advocacy Project Rubric: 50 pts |
Course: FMCD 5543 |
Name: |
|
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
||
|
Background
15 points |
Clear introduction highlighting the relevant, current, and serious nature of the topic. Appropriate research cited to support claims. 13-15 points
|
Some clear evidence alluding to the serious nature of the topic. Some supporting research cited...but ideas incomplete/lacking in depth. 10-12 points
|
Limited evidence connecting the reader to the serious nature of the topic. Little-none supporting research cited. 0-9 points |
|
Recommendations, Facts, and Talking Points
15 points |
At least 3 specific and relevant policy recommendations, at least 3 clear, brief talking points, at least four clear, relevant fact statements. All information cited research from scholarly sources. 13-15 points
|
Did basically what was asked, but did not go as deep as possible connection the issue to ideas for policy (recommendations), talking points, and fact statements. Some research cited, but may not all be from scholarly sources. Surface level. 10-12 points
|
Limited evidence of clear policy recommendations, talking points, and fact statements. Limited-no research cited 0-9 points |
|
Letter to Official And listed officials
7 points |
Organized block letter formatting, well-developed letter to government official clearly highlighting the importance of the topic and need for action. Legislator contact information provided. All officials listed based on place of residence. 6-7 points
|
Organized block letter formatting, well-developed letter to government official clearly highlighting the importance of the topic and need for action with some errors. Legislator contact information provided. Some officials listed based on place of residence. 4-5 points
|
Poorly formatted letter to official. Limited-no legislator contact information provided. Little-no officials listed based on place of residence. 0-4 points |
|
Web Resources
7 points |
At least 5 annotated web links provided giving information policy/advocacy for children and families. 6-7 points
|
At least 5 annotated web links provided giving information policy/advocacy for children and families with some errors and/or limitations in relevancy. 4-5 points
|
Limited-no annotated web links provided giving information policy/advocacy for children and families. 0-4 points |
|
Overall clarity, organization, and writing quality
6 points |
Clear structure and flow. Limited spelling and grammar errors. Few APA errors. 5-6 points
|
Good structure and flow. Some spelling and grammar errors. Some APA errors. 3-4 points |
Limited structure and flow. Pervasive spelling and grammar errors, and APA errors. 0-2 points |
Total: /50