Nursing ADVANCED PRACTICE ASSIGNMENT

profilepreet22
advancedpharmacologyNURS-6521NINSTRUCTION.docx

Assignment: Case Studies

Case studies are a useful way for you to apply your knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic aspects of pharmacology to specific patient cases and health histories.

For this Assignment, you evaluate drug treatment plans for patients with various disorders and justify drug therapy plans based on patient history and diagnosis.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

· Review the case study posted in “Announcements” by your Instructor for this Assignment

· Review the information provided and answer questions posed in the case study

· When recommending a medication, write out a complete prescription for the medication

· Whenever possible, use clinical practice guidelines in developing your answers when possible

· Include at least three references to support your answer and cite them in APA format.

By Day 7 of Week 4

Submit the Assignment.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the  Turnitin Drafts from the  Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as  WK4Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

2. Then, click on  Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on  Upload File and select  Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6521_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6521_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection.

15 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.

11 to >7.0 pts

Good

Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.

7 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

3 pts

Complete

Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

0 pts

Poor

The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable.

4 pts

Excellent

References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.

3 pts

Good

References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

2 pts

Fair

References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

0 pts

Poor

No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 1: Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

3 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

2 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

1 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection.

15 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.

11 to >7.0 pts

Good

Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.

7 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

3 pts

Complete

Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

0 pts

Poor

The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable.

4 pts

Excellent

References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.

3 pts

Good

References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

2 pts

Fair

References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

0 pts

Poor

No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 2: Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

3 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

2 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

1 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection.

15 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.

11 to >7.0 pts

Good

Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.

7 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

3 pts

Complete

Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

0 pts

Poor

The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable.

4 pts

Excellent

References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.

3 pts

Good

References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

2 pts

Fair

References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

0 pts

Poor

No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 3: Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

3 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

2 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

1 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Appropriate medication is prescribed or changed. Rationale provided and includes current literature to support decision. All aspects of the patient history are considered in making the medication selection.

15 to >11.0 pts

Excellent

Medication selected is appropriate and considers all of the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear, complete, and appropriate.

11 to >7.0 pts

Good

Medication selected might be appropriate but conflicts with the unique patient characteristics. Rationale for selection is clear but lacks discussion about potential prescribing issues.

7 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Medication selected is not appropriate for this patient unique characteristics. Rationale provided is not correct or is flawed in applying the medication to this patient.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Medication selected is inappropriate or would not be provided based on patient unique characteristics.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Written medication orders include all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

3 pts

Complete

Written medication orders includes all 5 aspects required for a valid order. The order is complete, accurate, and appropriate.

0 pts

Poor

The prescription is incomplete. Aspects of a complete order are missing. The order is either incomplete, inaccurate, or inappropriate.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable.

4 pts

Excellent

References for the scenario are within past 5 years and include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Correct APA format is used.

3 pts

Good

References for the scenario are within past 5 years but do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

2 pts

Fair

References for the scenario are not from within the past 5 years or do not reflect the content of this scenario and do not include the appropriate clinical practice guideline if applicable. Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

0 pts

Poor

No references are included. References do not reflect the content of this scenario. Appropriate clinical practice guideline is not include. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario 4: Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

3 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

2 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

1 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

3 pts

Total Points: 100

This week we will apply pharmacology concepts to the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary systems.  

Symptoms of various gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary disorders often overlap, making diagnosis and treatment challenging. For example, symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, and diarrhea are non-specific and could also be the result of underlying medical history or current prescription drug use. As an advanced practice nurse, you could be potentially responsible for providing care to a patient who may present with non-specific symptoms related to the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary systems. 

When selecting drugs and determining dosages for patients, it is essential to consider individual patient factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes. These patient factors include genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, behavior (ie diet, nutrition, smoking, alcohol, illicit drug abuse), and/or pathophysiological changes due to disease. 

 

ASSIGNMENT 

Submit your Assignment by  Day 7 of Week 4 (Sunday night, 11:59 pm ET) 

Case studies are a useful way for you to apply your knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic aspects of pharmacology to specific patient cases and health histories. 

For your week 4 assignment, evaluate drug treatment plans for patients with various disorders and justify drug therapy plans based on patient history and diagnosis. 

To Prepare: 

· Review assignment rubric and case studies. Be sure to thoroughly answer ALL questions. 

· Explain the problem and discuss how you would address the problem. 

· When recommending medications, write out a complete prescription for each medication. What order would you send to a pharmacy? Include drug, dose, route, frequency, quantity, # of refills and indication for use. Also state if you would continue, discontinue or taper the patient’s current medications. 

· Answer all questions using your required learning resources, clinical practice guidelines, Medscape, etc. 

· Include at least three references to support each scenario and cite them in APA format. Please include in-text citations. You do not need an introduction or conclusion paragraph. 

 

WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT: 

SCENARIO 1 

Donald is a 60 year old male presenting with dyspnea (shortness of breath), chronic productive cough, wheezing, and fatigue. He smokes 1 pack of cigarettes per day for the last 40 years. Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.70 confirms persistent airflow limitation. What treatment plan would you implement for this patient? What medication(s) would you prescribe? How would you monitor the effectiveness of this plan? 

SCENARIO 2 

Allen is a 49 year-year-old man seeking evaluation for “a burning sensation in my chest,” often after eating and worse at night. He has frequent feelings of bloating and occasional nausea. Allen consumes a diet high in fatty foods and caffeine. He drinks alcohol socially on weekends. PMH includes asthma, diabetes and hypertension. His current medications include prn albuterol, metformin 1000 mg po BID, nifedipine ER 60 mg po daily. How would you improve his drug therapy plan? What changes would you make? What is your working diagnosis and what medication would you prescribe? What information would you provide to the patient at his visit? 

SCENARIO 3 

Jessica is a 37-year-old female diagnosed with mild persistent asthma. During her visit today, she reports having to use her albuterol 4 days per week over the past month. Over the past week she has been using albuterol at least once per day. She reports being awakened by a cough five nights during the last month. Her current medications include: fluticasone HFA 44 mcg, two puffs BID, albuterol MDI two puffs Q 4–6 H PRN shortness of breath, Medrol Dosepak, metformin 500 mg PO BID, Inderal LA 160 mg po daily. How would you step up therapy for this patient? What medication changes would you make? How would you monitor the effectiveness of this plan? What patient teaching would you provide? 

SCENARIO 4 

June is a 71-year-old female and has Alzheimer’s Disease x 2 years. She presents with daytime dizziness, fatigue and increasing forgetfulness. Consider her labs and provide an updated drug therapy plan. Include complete medication orders. How would you monitor drug therapy? Labs: TSH 5 mU/L, vitamin D 29 ng/mL, B12 350 pg/mL, Hb 12.1 g/dL, HgA1C = 5.5% Meds: donepezil 5mg po qhs, zolpidem 10mg po qhs 

   

 

Note on Assignment Attempts 

Students are expected to review their work and submissions of work carefully prior to due dates. Unless otherwise approved by the faculty, students are allowed one submission of graded work per assignment. While the classroom allows for multiple submissions, once an assignment is graded, submissions will no longer be accepted unless approved by the faculty. If an assignment is submitted  prior to the assignment deadline and has not yet been graded, then students may submit a revised assignment prior to the assignment deadline. Once the deadline has passed, resubmission is  not permitted. 

image1.jpeg