Case Study

profilemstw2324
AddictionsCaseStudyDiagnosticImpressionsGradingRubric.docx

EDCO 740

Addictions Case Study: Diagnostic Impressions Grading Rubric

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content: 70%

Advanced

Satisfies criteria w/ excellence

Proficient

Satisfies Criteria

Developing

Satisfies most criteria

Below Expectations Does not satisfy criteria

Not Present

Primary Diagnostic Impression

28–30 pts.

All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences shown. Comorbidity shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.

25-27 pts.

All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences mostly shown. Comorbidity mostly shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues mostly shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.

22–24 pts.

Most pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.

1–21 pts.

Pertinent criteria met barely or not shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.

0 points

Main Secondary Diagnostic Impresson

28–30 pts.

All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences shown. Comorbidity shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.

25-27 pts.

All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences mostly shown. Comorbidity mostly shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues mostly shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.

22-24 pts.

Most pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.

1–21 pts.

Pertinent criteria met barely or not shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.

0 points

Additional Secondary Diagnostic Impressions

10 pts.

All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences shown. Comorbidity shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.

8-9 pts.

All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences mostly shown. Comorbidity mostly shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues mostly shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.

7 pts.

Most pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.

1–6 pts.

Pertinent criteria met barely or not shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.

0 points

Structure: 30%

Advanced

Satisfies criteria w/ excellence

Proficient

Satisfies Criteria

Developing

Satisfies most criteria

Below Expectations Does not satisfy criteria

0 points

Organization

10 pts.

All required elements are included and presented with strong headings and organizational clarity. There are clear transitions between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. The paper meets the page length requirement.

8-9 pts.

All required elements are included and organized. There are transitions between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. The paper meets the page length requirement or comes very close.

7 pts.

Most required elements are included and are mostly organized. Most paragraphs and sections have transitions. The logical treatment of the topic needs improvement. The paper may not meet the page length requirement.

1–6 pts.

Few or no required elements are included. Few or no transitions exist between paragraphs and sections. There may not be a logical treatment of the topic. The paper does not meet the page length requirement.

0 points

Style

10 pts.

The paper properly uses current APA style. Proper headings, in-text citations, and references are formatted correctly. The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are very few spelling and grammar errors.

8-9 pts.

The paper consistently uses current APA style with few or no exceptions. Proper headings, in-text citations, and references are formatted with few or no errors. The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are few spelling and grammar errors.

7 pts.

The paper inconsistently uses current APA style. Headings, in-text citations, and references are inconsistently formatted. The paper does not consistently reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are spelling and grammar errors.

1-6 pts.

The paper erroneously uses or does not use current APA style. Headings, in-text citations, and references are erroneously formatted or not present. The paper does not reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are spelling and grammar errors.

0 points

Sources

10 pts.

The Reference page meets or exceeds the required number of sources. All sources are referenced throughout the paper.

8-9 pts.

The Reference page meets the required number of sources. Most sources are referenced throughout the paper.

7 pts.

The Reference page does not meet the required number of sources. Not all sources are referenced throughout the paper.

1–6 pts.

The Reference page is not present or contains few sources. Not enough sources are referenced throughout the paper, or none are referenced.

0 points

Total

/100

Page 2 of 2