Addictions Case Study: Part 3 - Treatment Plan

profileTT24
AddictionsCaseStudy-Part3TreatmentPlanGradingRubric.pdf

Criteria Ratings Points

Treatment Plan

40 to >36 pts

Advanced

Minimum of four treatment plan problems and symptoms clearly shown. Clear and concise sentences of the problem shown. Provided very good examples of the problem.

36 to >33 pts

Proficient

Three out of four treatment plan problems and symptoms shown. Good sentences of the problem shown. Provided good examples of the problem.

33 to >29 pts

Developing

Two out of four treatment plan problems and symptoms shown. Adequate sentences of the problem shown. Provided adequate examples of the problem.

29 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

One or no treatment plan problems or symptoms shown as per instructions.

0 pts

Not Present

40 pts

Long-Term Goals

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

Minimum of two long-term goals shown under each problem/symptom.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

Minimum of two long-term goals shown under each problem/symptom. Long-term goals are not measurable.

7 to >6 pts

Developing

One out of two long-term goals shown under each problem/symptom. Long-term goals are not measurable.

6 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

No long-term goals shown as per instructions.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Short-Term Goals

20 to >17 pts

Advanced

Minimum of two short-term goals shown under each long-term goal (4 total). All four short-term goals are measurable.

17 to >14 pts

Proficient

Three out of the four short-term goals shown under each long-term goal. Most of the short-term goals are measurable.

14 to >11 pts

Developing

Two out of the four short-term goals shown under each long-term goal. At least one of the short-term goals is measurable.

11 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

One or no short-term goals shown as per instructions, and are not measurable.

0 pts

Not Present

20 pts

Addictions Case Study: Part 3 – Treatment Plan Grading Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620

Criteria Ratings Points

Organization 10 to >9 pts

Advanced

All required elements are included and presented with strong headings and organizational clarity. There are clear transitions between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. The paper is 7-9 pages in length, not including the title and reference pages.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

All required elements are included and organized. There are transitions between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. The paper meets the page length requirement of 7-9 pages (not including the title and reference pages) or comes very close.

7 to >6 pts

Developing

Most required elements are included and are mostly organized. Most paragraphs and sections have transitions. The logical treatment of the topic needs improvement. The paper may not meet the page length requirement.

6 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Few or no required elements are included. Few or no transitions exist between paragraphs and sections. There may not be a logical treatment of the topic. The paper does not meet the page length requirement.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Style 10 to >9 pts

Advanced

The paper properly uses current APA style. Proper headings, in-text citations, and references are formatted correctly. The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are very few spelling and grammar errors.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

The paper consistently uses current APA style with few or no exceptions. Proper headings, in-text citations, and references are formatted with few or no errors. The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are few spelling and grammar errors.

7 to >6 pts

Developing

The paper inconsistently uses current APA style. Headings, in-text citations, and references are inconsistently formatted. The paper does not consistently reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are spelling and grammar errors.

6 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

The paper erroneously uses or does not use current APA style. Headings, in-text citations, and references are erroneously formatted or not present. The paper does not reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are spelling and grammar errors.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Addictions Case Study: Part 3 – Treatment Plan Grading Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620

Criteria Ratings Points

Sources 10 to >9 pts

Advanced

The Reference page meets or exceeds the required number of sources (a minimum of 7 professional sources). All sources are referenced throughout the paper.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

The Reference page meets the required number of sources (7 professional sources). Most sources are referenced throughout the paper.

7 to >6 pts

Developing

The Reference page does not meet the required number of sources. Not all sources are referenced throughout the paper.

6 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

The Reference page is not present or contains few sources. Not enough sources are referenced throughout the paper, or none are referenced.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Total Points: 100

Addictions Case Study: Part 3 – Treatment Plan Grading Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620