Addictions Case Study Part 1 Case Conceptualization

Criteria Ratings Points

Introduction 10 to >9 pts

Advanced

Synopsis paragraph is clear, concise, understandable; covers: presenting problem, substance history, all substances used, side effects, and most important issues.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

Synopsis paragraph is good and understandable; mostly covers: presenting problem, substance history, all substances used, side effects, and most important issues.

7 to >6 pts

Developing

Synopsis paragraph is adequate; mostly covers: presenting problem, substance history, most substances used, side effects, and some important issues.

6 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Synopsis paragraph is adequate; does not or barely covers: presenting problem, substance history, some substances used, side effects, and some or nonimportant issues.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Dangers and Risks

5 to >4 pts

Advanced

Potential dangers/risks for the client clearly shown. Risk management steps shown. Correct stage of change given.

4 to >3 pts

Proficient

Potential dangers/risks for the client shown. Risk management steps mostly shown. Correct/close to correct stage of change given.

3 to >2 pts

Developing

Potential dangers/risks for the client mostly shown. Risk management steps adequately shown. Close to correct stage of change given.

2 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Potential dangers/risks for the client barely or not shown. Risk management steps adequately or not shown. Incorrect stage of change given.

0 pts

Not Present

5 pts

AUDIT Items 15 to >13 pts

Advanced

All pertinent AUDIT items shown. Correct total score shown. Explanation of how points distributed, and total score arrived at shown.

13 to >11 pts

Proficient

All pertinent AUDIT items shown. Correct/close to correct total score shown. Good explanation of how points distributed, and total score arrived at shown.

11 to >10 pts

Developing

Most pertinent AUDIT items shown. Close to correct total score shown. Adequate explanation of how points distributed, and total score arrived at shown.

10 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Some or no pertinent AUDIT items shown. Incorrect total score shown. Barely adequate explanation of how points distributed, and total score arrived at shown, or not shown.

0 pts

Not Present

15 pts

Addictions Case Study: Part 1 – Case Conceptualization Grading Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620

Criteria Ratings Points

Referrals 15 to >13 pts

Advanced

Possible referrals - minimum of three “bullet-points” (5 points apiece).

13 to >11 pts

Proficient

Two possible referrals shown as “bullet-points.”

11 to >10 pts

Developing

One possible referral shown as “bullet-points.”

10 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

No possible referrals shown as per instructions.

0 pts

Not Present

15 pts

Questions 5 to >4 pts

Advanced

Minimum of two questions that the student would have asked the client shown. Questions are well-done and pertinent to the client’s life and narrative.

4 to >3 pts

Proficient

Two questions that the student would have asked the client shown. Questions are adequate to the client’s life and narrative.

3 to >2 pts

Developing

One question that the student would have asked the client shown. Question is adequate to the client’s life and narrative.

2 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

No questions shown as per instructions.

0 pts

Not Present

5 pts

Addictions Genogram

20 to >17 pts

Advanced

3 levels of a basic genogram completely shown. Genogram relationships completely shown. All substance usage by family members shown.

17 to >14 pts

Proficient

3 levels of a basic genogram mostly shown. Genogram relationships mostly shown. Substance usage by client only is shown.

14 to >11 pts

Developing

3 levels of a basic genogram shown. Genogram relationships mostly shown. No substance usage by family members shown.

11 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Genogram not attached as per instructions.

0 pts

Not Present

20 pts

Addictions Case Study: Part 1 – Case Conceptualization Grading Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620

Criteria Ratings Points

Organization 10 to >9 pts

Advanced

All required elements are included and presented with strong headings and organizational clarity. There are clear transitions between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. The paper is between 7-9 pages in length, not including the title and reference pages.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

All required elements are included and organized. There are transitions between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. The paper meets the page length requirement of 7-9 pages (not including the title and reference pages) or comes very close.

7 to >6 pts

Developing

Most required elements are included and are mostly organized. Most paragraphs and sections have transitions. The logical treatment of the topic needs improvement. The paper may not meet the page length requirement.

6 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Few or no required elements are included. Few or no transitions exist between paragraphs and sections. There may not be a logical treatment of the topic. The paper does not meet the page length requirement.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Style 10 to >9 pts

Advanced

The paper properly uses current APA style. Proper headings, in-text citations, and references are formatted correctly. The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are very few spelling and grammar errors.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

The paper consistently uses current APA style with few or no exceptions. Proper headings, in-text citations, and references are formatted with few or no errors. The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are few spelling and grammar errors.

7 to >6 pts

Developing

The paper inconsistently uses current APA style. Headings, in-text citations, and references are inconsistently formatted. The paper does not consistently reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are spelling and grammar errors.

6 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

The paper erroneously uses or does not use current APA style. Headings, in-text citations, and references are erroneously formatted or not present. The paper does not reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are spelling and grammar errors.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Addictions Case Study: Part 1 – Case Conceptualization Grading Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620

Criteria Ratings Points

Sources 10 to >9 pts

Advanced

The Reference page meets or exceeds the required number of sources (a minimum of 3 scholarly sources). All sources are referenced throughout the paper.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

The Reference page meets the required number of sources (3 scholarly sources). Most sources are referenced throughout the paper.

7 to >6 pts

Developing

The Reference page does not meet the required number of sources. Not all sources are referenced throughout the paper.

6 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

The Reference page is not present or contains few sources. Not enough sources are referenced throughout the paper, or none are referenced.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Total Points: 100

Addictions Case Study: Part 1 – Case Conceptualization Grading Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620