Activity Week 2

5/11/2020 Rubric Detail – 31514.202030

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_872605_1&course_i… 1/3

Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

  Unsatisfactory- Developing Accomplished Exemplary

Ideas, Arguments, & Analysis

0.5 (5.00%) Ideas expressed lack an understanding of the discussion topic. Comments are irrelevant, o�- topic, and/or confusing to follow. Viewpoint, if given, is not supported with evidence or examples.

1.5 (15.00%) Ideas expressed in discussion posts show a minimal understanding of the discussion topic. Comments are general in nature and/or occasionally may not be relevant. Rehashes or summarizes ideas with limited analysis, original thought, and/or supported viewpoints.

2 (20.00%) Ideas expressed in discussion posts are mostly substantive and relevant to topic; some original thought. Demonstrates logical thinking, reasoning, and/or analysis for most part. Viewpoint is supported with evidence and/or examples.

2.5 (25.00%) Ideas expressed in discussion posts include original thought, substantial depth, and are relevant to topic. Viewpoint shows strong logical thinking, reasoning, and analysis with evidence and examples. Construction of new meaning and insights are evident.

Connection to Course Materials

0.5 (5.00%) No connections are made to

di

1.5 (15.00%) Minimal direct connections

d t

2 (20.00%) Some direct connections

d t

2.5 (25.00%) Strong, direct connections

d t

Name: Re�ection & Discussion Rubric Exit

Grid View List View

5/11/2020 Rubric Detail – 31514.202030

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_872605_1&course_i… 2/3

  Unsatisfactory- Developing Accomplished Exemplary readings or other course materials (lectures, media, resources, etc.), and/or if made, are not clearly stated and are largely personal opinions.

are made to readings and/or other course materials (lectures, media, resources, etc.). Connections are largely inferred and somewhat unclear at times.

are made to readings and/or other course materials (lectures, media, resources, etc.) and are clearly stated for the most part.

are made to readings and/or other course materials (lectures, media, resources, etc.) and are clearly stated.

Writing Quality

0.5 (5.00%) Posts show a below average/poor writing style that lacks standard English, and/or is di�cult for readers to follow. Contains frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.

1.5 (15.00%) Posts show an average and/or casual writing style using standard English that is generally clear but contains some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.

2 (20.00%) Discussion posts show above average writing style that is clear using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and/or spelling.

2.5 (25.00%) Discussion posts are well written and clearly articulated using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style with correct grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.

Contribution to Learning Community

0.5 (5.00%) Negligible contribution to th l i

1.5 (15.00%) Somewhat contributes to th l i

2 (20.00%) Contributes to the learning

it

2.5 (25.00%) E�ectively contributes to th l i

5/11/2020 Rubric Detail – 31514.202030

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_872605_1&course_i… 3/3

  Unsatisfactory- Developing Accomplished Exemplary the learning community. Rarely engages with students and generally ignores others’ posts and/or has a negative e�ect through misrepresenting content in other posts, inappropriate comments made, and/or attempts to dominate the discussion.

the learning community but the focus is generally on own posts. Occasionally interacts with others’ postings but little attempt to involve other students in the discussion. Short statements such as “I agree with…”.

community. Often attempts to direct group discussion to present relevant viewpoints and meaningful re�ection by others. Interacts respectfully with students.

the learning community. Frequently initiates dialogue and motivates group discussion by providing feedback to students’ postings, asking follow- up questions, and through thoughtful, re�ective comments. Respectfully encourages a variety of viewpoints and invites contributions from others.

Name:Re�ection & Discussion Rubric Exit