QSO 420 ( week 5)

QSO‐420 Milestone Two Rubric Activity: 4‐2 Final Project Milestone Two: Earned Value Management Calculations

Course: QSO‐420‐H5938 Integrated Cost/Sched Control 23EW5

Name: Mohammed Alshaghathirah

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Calculations:

EVM Measures

30 / 30

Criterion Feedback

Described EV measures

Calculations:

Equations

16.5 / 30

Criterion Feedback

Did not provide all calculations from the spreadsheet. These are needed to accurately track the entire project

(software/technical/combined)

30 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and

articulation is

exceptionally clear

and logical

25.5 points

Accurately

demonstrates how

elements are used

to calculate EVM

measures

16.5 points

Demonstrates how

elements are used

to calculate EVM

measures, but with

gaps in accuracy

0 points

Does not

demonstrate how

elements are used

to calculate EVM

measures

30 points

N/A

This level is not

applicable for

grading of this

criterion.

30 points

Accurately employs

EVM equations to

calculate EVM

measures for

project in case

study

16.5 points

Employs EVM

equations to

calculate EVM

measures, but with

gaps in accuracy

0 points

Does not employ

EVM equations to

calculate EVM

measures

Activities - QSO-420-H5938 Integrated Cost/Sched Control 23EW5 - Southern New Hampshi... https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/activities_dialog.d2l?d2l_body_type=2&ou...

1 of 3 6/4/2023, 10:12 AM

Total 86.5 / 100

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Calculations:

Implications

30 / 30

Criterion Feedback

Described implications of CPI/SPI

Articulation of

Response

10 / 10

Criterion Feedback

Well presented

30 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and

articulation is

exceptionally clear

and logical

25.5 points

Accurately explains

implications for

project per

specifications

16.5 points

Explains

implications for

project but with

gaps in accuracy or

detail

0 points

Does not explain

implications for

project

10 points

Submission is free

of errors related to

citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax,

and organization

and is presented in

a professional and

easy‐to‐read

format

8.5 points

Submission has no

major errors related

to citations,

grammar, spelling,

syntax, or

organization

5.5 points

Submission has

major errors related

to citations,

grammar, spelling,

syntax, or

organization that

negatively impact

readability and

articulation of main

ideas

0 points

Submission has

critical errors

related to citations,

grammar, spelling,

syntax, or

organization that

prevent

understanding of

ideas

Activities - QSO-420-H5938 Integrated Cost/Sched Control 23EW5 - Southern New Hampshi... https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/activities_dialog.d2l?d2l_body_type=2&ou...

2 of 3 6/4/2023, 10:12 AM

Overall Score

Exemplary Instructors should not modify

this row (it will automate from

the scores above). This score

represents the average

evaluation across all rubric

criteria.

Proficient Instructors should not modify

this row (it will automate from

the scores above). This score

represents the average

evaluation across all rubric

criteria.

Needs Improvement Instructors should not modify

this row (it will automate from

the scores above). This score

represents the average

evaluation across all rubric

criteria.

Not Evident Instructors should not modify

this row (it will automate from

the scores above). This score

represents the average

evaluation across all rubric

criteria.

Activities - QSO-420-H5938 Integrated Cost/Sched Control 23EW5 - Southern New Hampshi... https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/activities_dialog.d2l?d2l_body_type=2&ou...

3 of 3 6/4/2023, 10:12 AM