QSO 420 ( week 5)

QSO‐420 Milestone One Rubric Activity: 3‐2 Final Project Milestone One: Earned Value Parameters

Course: QSO‐420‐H5938 Integrated Cost/Sched Control 23EW5

Name: Mohammed Alshaghathirah

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Parameters:

Elements

20 / 20

Criterion Feedback

Defined the basic elements of EV

Parameters:

Analysis

0 / 20

Criterion Feedback

Did not see where the data from the case study was identified either by exhibit or by sampling.

20 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and uses

industry‐specific

language to

establish expertise

17 points

Accurately defines

basic elements

used to calculate

EVM measures and

identifies their

location within

project

documentation

11 points

Defines basic

elements used to

calculate EVM

measures, but does

not identify their

location within

project

documentation, or

definition lacks

accuracy

0 points

Does not define

basic elements

used to calculate

EVM measures

20 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and

examples provided

evidence of well‐

informed, keen

insight into EVM

principles

17 points

Comprehensively

analyzes project

documentation for

data necessary to

establish EVM

parameters and

justifies rationale

with examples

11 points

Analyzes project

documentation for

data necessary to

establish EVM

parameters, but

with gaps in detail,

or does not justify

rationale with

examples

0 points

Does not analyze

project

documentation for

data necessary to

establish EVM

parameters

Activities - QSO-420-H5938 Integrated Cost/Sched Control 23EW5 - Southern New Hampshi... https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/activities_dialog.d2l?d2l_body_type=2&ou...

1 of 3 6/4/2023, 10:09 AM

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Parameters:

Earned Value

11 / 20

Criterion Feedback

Identified percent complete and weighted milestone methods, but not familiar with the others. The text has the list along

with the module announcement.

Parameters:

Selection

20 / 20

Criterion Feedback

Selected the percent complete method

20 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and uses

industry‐specific

language to

establish expertise

17 points

Comprehensively

discusses methods

used to determine

earned value

11 points

Discusses methods

used to determine

earned value, but

with gaps in detail

0 points

Does not discuss

methods used to

determine earned

value

20 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and

provides

explanation of why

other methods are

inappropriate for

project in case

study

17 points

Selects appropriate

method for

determining earned

value for project in

case study and

substantiates

position with

research

11 points

Selects method for

determining earned

value for project in

case study, but

method is not

appropriate, or

does not

substantiate

position with

research

0 points

Does not select

method for

determining earned

value for project in

case study

Activities - QSO-420-H5938 Integrated Cost/Sched Control 23EW5 - Southern New Hampshi... https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/activities_dialog.d2l?d2l_body_type=2&ou...

2 of 3 6/4/2023, 10:09 AM

Total 71 / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Articulation of

Response

20 / 20

Criterion Feedback

No errors noted

20 points

Submission is free

of errors related to

citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax,

and organization

and is presented in

a professional and

easy‐to‐read

format

17 points

Submission has no

major errors related

to citations,

grammar, spelling,

syntax, or

organization

11 points

Submission has

major errors related

to citations,

grammar, spelling,

syntax, or

organization that

negatively impact

readability and

articulation of main

ideas

0 points

Submission has

critical errors

related to citations,

grammar, spelling,

syntax, or

organization that

prevent

understanding of

ideas

Exemplary Instructors should not modify

this row (it will automate from

the scores above). This score

represents the average

evaluation across all rubric

criteria.

Proficient Instructors should not modify

this row (it will automate from

the scores above). This score

represents the average

evaluation across all rubric

criteria.

Needs Improvement Instructors should not modify

this row (it will automate from

the scores above). This score

represents the average

evaluation across all rubric

criteria.

Not Evident Instructors should not modify

this row (it will automate from

the scores above). This score

represents the average

evaluation across all rubric

criteria.

Activities - QSO-420-H5938 Integrated Cost/Sched Control 23EW5 - Southern New Hampshi... https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lms/grades/my_grades/activities_dialog.d2l?d2l_body_type=2&ou...

3 of 3 6/4/2023, 10:09 AM