6-1 Final Project Milestone Four: Initial Draft of Methods and Results

PSY 520 Milestone Four Rubric Activity: 6-1 Final Project Milestone Four: Initial Draft of Methods and Results

Course: PSY-520-X3293 Research Methods in Psych II 23TW3

Name: Sule Umit

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Methods:

Participants

0 / 15

Criterion Feedback

You did not include this section.

15 points

N/A

This level is not

applicable for

grading of this

criterion.

15 points

Outlines the

participants in the

study and how they

were recruited

10.5 points

Outlines the

participants in the

study, but does not

explain how they

were recruited

0 points

Does not outline the

participants in the

study

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Methods: Materials 10.5 / 15

Methods:

Methodological

Procedures

10.5 / 15

15 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and describes

materials that are

especially well

aligned to the

research question

13.5 points

Describes the

materials created for

the study and how

they specifically

address the research

question and

audience

10.5 points

Describes the

materials created for

the study, but does

not describe how

they specifically

address the research

question or audience,

or description has

gaps in accuracy or

detail

0 points

Does not describe

the materials created

for the study and how

they specifically

address the research

question and

audience

15 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and describes

procedures that are

especially well

aligned to the

research question

13.5 points

Describes the

methodological

procedures used to

collect data and how

the materials were

used in collecting

10.5 points

Describes the

methodological

procedures used to

collect data, but not

how the materials

were used in

collecting, or

description has gaps

in accuracy or detail

0 points

Does not describe

the methodological

procedures used to

collect data and how

the materials were

used in collecting

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Results: Raw Data 7 / 10

Results: Descriptive

Statistics

7 / 10

10 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and is

exceptionally clear,

contextualized, and

aligned to the

research question

9 points

Describes how the

raw data was reduced

for statistical analysis,

clearly detailing each

step of the process

7 points

Describes how the

raw data was

reduced for

statistical analysis,

but does not clearly

detail each step of

the process, or steps

are inappropriate

0 points

Does not describe

how the raw data was

reduced for statistical

analysis

10 points

N/A

This level is not

applicable for

grading of this

criterion.

10 points

Creates a table

outlining the

descriptive statistics

for the key variables

7 points

Creates a table

outlining the

descriptive statistics

for the key variables,

with gaps in accuracy

or detail

0 points

Does not create a

table outlining the

descriptive statistics

for the key variables

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Results: Statistical

Test

0 / 15

Results: Manuscript

Standards

10.5 / 15

15 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and

demonstrates a

nuanced

understanding the

alignment between

appropriate statistical

tests and data

13.5 points

Describes the

statistical test

selected and explains

why the test is the

most appropriate for

analyzing the data

10.5 points

Describes the

statistical test

selected, but does

not explain why the

test is the most

appropriate for

analyzing the data, or

explanation lacks

detail or accuracy

0 points

Does not describe

the statistical test

selected

15 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria, and

manuscript is of the

quality that would be

found in an American

Psychological

Association article

13.5 points

Manuscript is of

professional quality,

as outlined by the

American

Psychological

Association’s

standards

10.5 points

Manuscript is aligned

with the American

Psychological

Association’s

standards, but not of

professional quality

0 points

Manuscript is not

aligned with the

American

Psychological

Association’s

standards

Total 49 / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Articulation of

Response

3.5 / 5

Criterion Feedback

I added some specific feedback in the body of your paper that you can access via Turnitin.

5 points

Submission is free of

errors related to

citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, and

organization and is

presented in a

professional and

easy-to-read format

4.5 points

Submission has no

major errors related

to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or

organization

3.5 points

Submission has major

errors related to

citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or

organization that

negatively impact

readability and

articulation of main

ideas

0 points

Submission has

critical errors related

to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or

organization that

prevent

understanding of

ideas

Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 91

points or more. Final calculation of

grades can be found in the

gradebook.

Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 71

points or more. Final calculation of

grades can be found in the

gradebook.

Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 1

points or more. Final calculation of

grades can be found in the

gradebook.

Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 0

points or more. Final calculation of

grades can be found in the

gradebook.