I need to fix the essay and add some requirements

profileKevin19
activism.docx

Surname 5

Student’s Name

Professor’s Name

Course

Date

Activism

Every individual is active in the maintenance of the structures we live in one way or another. The majority of individuals, however, are silent activists who relinquish their authority to others. This article was written by Sarah Clancy, a campaigner, and poet who also trains people on campaigning strategies in addition to being a tour guide. The title of the article is why activism is good for you (Clancy). The purpose of this article is to advocate for every individual to take part in activism by using effective methods through the application of logos, ethos, and pathos. Although the author does not comprehensively address the cons of the failure to take part in activism, she makes a robust argument in support of the reasons why activism plays a significant role in the society.

Logos

Clancy begins her article by pointing out the negative perception that numerous individuals have regarding activism. The author notes that people who are passionate or care about a particular course are considered to be naive. As such, people hold the opinion that activism should only be left to some paragons of virtue or experts as they are viewed to be capable of making the most significant contributions in the society. Ultimately, this notion prevents most individuals from standing up for the issues that they believe and which may cause a positive impact for the benefit of the entire community (Clancy). Clancy invokes logos to an appeal to the audience by comparing the way that society functions in its failure to take part in activism to the biological triggers of poor psychological health. For instance, the author notes that the pressures to succeed in line with another person’s description of what success entails may be overwhelming, and if one does not conform to that definition, thus, it may appear that their satisfaction or wellbeing is not achievable. Clancy contends this notion by reassuring the audience that they are potent agents of transformation as opposed to passive beneficiaries of culture. The author also points out the society may face adverse effects when people do not engage in activism, and to support this claim, Clancy likens it to the failure of an individual to control their diet and participate in an exercise, which eventually directly affects their body.

Ethos

The author builds credibility with the audience by discussing the development of various rights and freedoms that have occurred throughout generations in Ireland. Clancy begins by engaging the audience to ponder on how they, for instance, take the entitlements and rights such as women voting rights and freedom from slavery for granted in the present society in Ireland. To support her call for activism, the author reveals to the audience that these rights were issues that individuals considered essential, and therefore, they united to attain them. Clancy goes on to state that the individuals who were involved in pushing for these freedoms and rights went through resistance and hardship, but they did not give in since they acknowledged that they would be beneficial to every individual in the end (Clancy). As such, the activism for the rights and freedoms came to be culturally, legally, and socially, considered as the norm. The writer acknowledges that although there may be some infringement on some of these rights such as instances of oppression or inequalities in gender, this does not rule out the fact that the freedoms and rights are recognized by institutions and culture as standards that people may face penalization or be reprimanded if they violate them.

Pathos

The writer engages the emotions of the readers to demonstrate the positive effect that activism may have on an individual, wherein she points out that every small endeavor that she does to advocate for something that she cares about makes her feel better about herself. Through this illustration, the reader may interpret that activism brings about satisfaction since an individual is capable of obtaining something which they consider to be important in addition to encompassing numerous benefits for the whole society (Clancy). The author also notes how people in the present community take the rights and freedoms that have been advocated for throughout the years for granted. As such, the reader may feel guilty especially when the author points out that rights such as days and weekends off from work and the freedom to choose one’s political affiliation and personal interest are not accorded the respect and acknowledgment that they deserve considering that the individuals who advocated for them went through hardships and resistance in making sure that these rights are recognized at every level in the society.

In conclusion, the author engages the audience through various compelling ways to build her argument on why activism is good for every individual. The writer incorporates logical arguments to support her claim on the importance of activism by comparing the failure to take part in activism to the inability to regulate one’s diet. Both of these instances result in adverse effects on the society and to one’s health, respectively (Clancy). Therefore this enables the audience to understand the logic behind the benefits of participating in activism. To build the credibility of the readers, the writer taps into the values that the readers hold regarding rights and freedoms. As such, Clancy demonstrates how activism played a significant role in the institution of these values to make them recognizable by the society. The last method of persuasion that the writer employs is through the tapping of the readers’ emotions. In this case, Clancy invokes guilt in the audience by pointing out how people disregard various freedom and rights that they presently enjoy without taking into account the hardships and resistance that was involved in advocating for them.

Works Cited

Clancy, Sarah. "Why activism is good for you." Lust for Life (n.d.): 1-4.