Discussion 6
dst1011
ActionResearch.pptxAction Research
Community & Social Systems
Amridge University
Eric Dishongh, PhD
Mendenhall, T.J., & Doherty, W.J. (2005). Action research methods in family therapy. In D.H. Sprenkle & F.P. Piercy (Eds.), Research methods in family therapy (pp. 100-118). New York, NY: Guilford.
Democratic Partnership
Deep Investment in Change
Problem Solving in Context
A Cyclical Process of Action and Evaluation
Humility and High Adaptability to Change
A Slow and Messy Process
Philosophical Assumptions
Research Questions
Sampling and Selection Procedures
Data Collection and Analysis Procedures
Reporting of Processes and Findings
Methodology
Immediate Relevancy to Context
Use of Existing Resources
Empowering Communities in Processes of Change
Self-Reflection and High Adaptability of Change
Forward-Facing Vision and “Thinking Outside the Box”
Strengths
Incompatibility with Conventional Means of Professional Recognition
The Slow and Messy Process
Conventional Regulatory Bodies’ Unfamiliarity with Action Research
Weaknesses
Insider vs. Outsider Positions of Researchers
Primary Source Data
Use of Multiple Methods
Issues of Reliability and Validity
Charismatic, and Then Collaborative, Leadership
Group Facilitation Skills
Humility
Patience, Flexibility, and a High Tolerance for Ambiguity
Skills for Investigators
Increased Multidisciplinary Collaboration
Increased Visibility in Graduate Education
Increased Visibility in Professional Arenas
Future Directions
