need to finish 1500 to 3000-word High-quality research-based management accounting Assignment in next 24hours

Asia Pacific College of Business and Law Semester 1, 2020 Page 1 of 5

ACT302_RESEARCH_ASSIGNMENT_120_RUBRIC.DOCX

ACT302 - ASSESSMENT RUBRIC RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT S1 2020

The following rubrics/comments should provide you with a guide on how the Assignment will be assessed. The range of grades will be:

HD

D

C

P

Unsatisfactory

85%-100%

75%-<85%

65%-<75%

50%-<65%

0%-<50%

Preparation - 2.5%

Assignment presentation should comply with the requirements set out in the Assignment Details and on Learnline.

Assignment presented in accordance with instructions and guidelines.

Assignment generally presented in accordance with instructions and guidelines. - A few requirements not met.

In some respects the assignment has been presented in accordance with instructions and guidelines, but several requirements not met.

In a few respects the assignment has been presented in accordance with some instructions and guidelines, but most requirements not met.

Assignment not presented in accordance with instructions and guidelines -Please ensure that assignment preparations guidelines are met.

General Format - 2.5%

Structure

Very strong introduction, conclusion and topic sentences. Strongly logical sequence of ideas. Strong connections between statements and evidence.

Introduction, conclusion and topic sentences are evident and appropriate. Logical sequence of ideas. Connections between statements and evidence are clear.

Introduction, conclusion are limited. Use of topic sentences demonstrates some control of ideas. Connections between statements and evidence are not always clear.

Some organization apparent: introduction, conclusion, and topic sentences may be missing or incomplete. Reader must make the connections between statements and evidence.

Minimal attempt at

paragraphing, often

unsuccessful; strings of

sentences; inadequate

introduction, conclusion.

Topic sentences erratically

used. Ideas appear to be in

random order. Evidence

missing or not clearly

connected to statements.

Asia Pacific College of Business and Law Semester 1, 2020 Page 2 of 5

ACT302_RESEARCH_ASSIGNMENT_120_RUBRIC.DOCX

Mechanics - Grammar - Spelling

Grammar, correct form (headings, indentations etc); spelling, punctuation (capitalization, apostrophes, commas, colons, semi- colons etc.) error-free. The report has clearly been successfully edited and proofread before submission.

Form, punctuation, and spelling mostly error free. Some closer proofreading needed.

Occasional errors in, form, punctuation, and spelling; sometimes distracting. Some additional editing and proofreading is warranted.

Form, punctuation, and spelling errors are distracting.

Form, punctuation and

spelling, errors throughout.

ACT302 - ASSESSMENT RUBRIC RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT S1 2020

The following rubrics/comments should provide you with a guide on how the Assignment will be assessed. The range of grades will be:

HD

D

C

P

Unsatisfactory

85%-100%

75%-<85%

65%-<75%

50%-<65%

0%-<50%

Continued on next page...

Research- 15%

Research and data

acquisition

Evidence of broad,

systematic and creative

research. Selection of

relevant data goes beyond

the mainstream literature,

tutorial notes, and textbook.

Evidence of controlled and

systematic research.

Demonstrates selection of

credible, relevant data.

Information is gathered from

quality literature, tutorial

notes, and textbook.

Evidence of good research skills. Demonstrates selection of credible, relevant data. Information is gathered from a good range of electronic and non-

electronic sources.

Research conducted demonstrates an attempt to collect credible and/or relevant data. Information is gathered from

a limited range of electronic

and non-electronic sources

Limited research skills

demonstrated. Poorly

selected data.

Topic Development, Application and Analysis - 75%

Asia Pacific College of Business and Law Semester 1, 2020 Page 3 of 5

ACT302_RESEARCH_ASSIGNMENT_120_RUBRIC.DOCX

Topic Development

Full and rich development:

focus, relevance,

explanations and support

show sophistication in

thinking and approach.

Clear and complete

development of content;

clear focus, relevant

examples, thoughtful

explanations demonstrate

controlled approach.

Topic development is

unclear, unfocused or

lacking depth. Supporting

information and

explanations demonstrate

some understandings.

Topic development is

incomplete or unclear;

inadequate focus and

relevance in explanations.

Simplistic statement of

content; often copied from

sources or lists of

information demonstrating

failure to develop own focus

and explanations.

Application of theory

Demonstrates skilful use of high quality, credible, relevant information to support ideas, arguments, conclusions and recommendations. All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skilfully applied.

Demonstrates consistent use of credible, relevant information to support ideas, arguments, conclusions and recommendations. Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately applied, however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.

Demonstrates an attempt to use credible and/or relevant information to support ideas, arguments, conclusions and recommendations. Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused.

Demonstrates an attempt to use relevant information to support ideas, arguments, conclusions and recommendations. Inquiry design demonstrates some misunderstandings of the methodology or theoretical framework.

Connection between information and ideas, arguments, conclusions and recommendations unclear or non-existent. Theoretical frameworks not applied.

ACT302 - ASSESSMENT RUBRIC RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT S1 2020

The following rubrics/comments should provide you with a guide on how the Assignment will be assessed. The range of grades will be:

HD

D

C

P

Unsatisfactory

85%-100%

75%-<85%

65%-<75%

50%-<65%

0%-<50%

Continued on next page...

Asia Pacific College of Business and Law Semester 1, 2020 Page 4 of 5

ACT302_RESEARCH_ASSIGNMENT_120_RUBRIC.DOCX

Analysis of sources/evidence

Examines the evidence and source of evidence; questions its accuracy, precision, relevance, completeness. Accurately interprets a range of evidence: eg. statements, graphics, charts, primary, secondary, media. Thoughtfully analyses and evaluates major alternative points of view. Justifies key results and procedures, explains assumptions and reasons. Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead.

Accurately interprets a range of evidence: eg statements, graphics, images etc. Offers analyses and evaluations of obvious alternative points of view.. Follows where evidence and reasons lead.

Accurately interprets most

evidence. Evaluates some

alternative points of view.

Maintains views based on

evidence and reason.

Misinterprets some evidence. Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view. Regardless of the evidence or reasons maintains or defends views based on self-interest or preconceptions.

Offers biased interpretations of evidence or the points of view of others. Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view Argues using fallacious or irrelevant reasons, and unwarranted claims. Exhibits close- mindedness or hostility to reason.

BIBLIOGRAPHY and REFERENCING - 5%

ACT302 - ASSESSMENT RUBRIC RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT S1 2020

The following rubrics/comments should provide you with a guide on how the Assignment will be assessed. The range of grades will be:

HD

D

C

P

Unsatisfactory

85%-100%

75%-<85%

65%-<75%

50%-<65%

0%-<50%

Asia Pacific College of Business and Law Semester 1, 2020 Page 5 of 5

ACT302_RESEARCH_ASSIGNMENT_120_RUBRIC.DOCX

Referencing

Direct quotation used

sparingly; good synthesis of

knowledge demonstrated.

Consistent and accurate

referencing used throughout,

showing ability to reference

a range of source types

(books, chapters in books,

journal articles, conference

papers, newspapers, lecture

notes, reports, internet

pages). Ideas and words of

others acknowledged.

Direct quotation is used and

synthesis of knowledge

demonstrated. Mostly

accurate referencing

demonstrates an ability to

reference a variety of

source types (books,

chapters in books, journal

articles, conference papers,

newspapers, lecture notes,

reports, and internet pages).

Ideas and words of others

are acknowledged.

Some overuse of the words

of others. Referencing is at

times inconsistent or

demonstrates ability to

reference only some source

types accurately (books,

chapters in books, journal

articles, conference papers,

newspapers, lecture notes,

reports, and internet pages).

Words, but not always the

ideas of others are

acknowledged.

Overuse of another's words

or ideas which may also

inconsistently or inaccurately

referenced. Some

acknowledgement of texts

consulted in a general

bibliography.

Failure to acknowledge the

words and ideas of others.

Plagiarised: reads like a

"data dump" from other

sources.