Research Paper on "High Performance computing Architecture"

Kpl

acm_submission_template1.docx

Home >Computer Science homework help >Research Paper on "High Performance computing Architecture"

Simplified Submission Template for ACM Papers*

Insert Your Subtitle Here

First A. Author

First Department Name, First Institution/University Name, City, State, Country, [email protected]

Executive Summary/Abstract

100-200 words describing what has been done, main observations and results.

KEYWORDS

Insert comma delimited author-supplied keyword list, Keyword number 2, Keyword number 3, Keyword number 4

Introduction:

This section includes a longer summary of what has been done, main observations and results. The report introduction should briefly discuss how the used techniques are different from previous work on the topic.

Background/Related Work

This submission version of your paper should not have headers or footers, Baldassare (2000). It should remain in a one-column format—please do not alter any of the styles or margins.[footnoteRef:1] [1: Footnote when needed.]

Subsection example

There are two types of math equations: the numbered display math equation and the un-numbered display math equation. Below are examples of both.[footnoteRef:2] [2: Foot print 2 if needed]

(1)

Methodology

Describe your understanding of the main contributions of the topic you are reporting on: what was done, how it was done, how it works, etc. Provide architectural diagrams, charts and figures where necessary with proper citation.

Figure 3: Example of the “Large Float” feature.

Figure 4: Large figure spanning in both the columns in final version.

Experiment Results/Observations

Depending on the topic you are reporting on, you will need to include a description of the experimental setup (if included in the original paper you are reviewing). Aim to be concise and utilize graphs to show any improvements. Include a summary of results analysis: what the results mean and the trends that are revealed

Conclusions and Future Work

Include here a brief summary of the work and results. Include any future work that is expected or could be done.

REFERENCES

[1] Patricia S. Abril and Robert Plant. 2007. The patent holder's dilemma: Buy, sell, or troll? Commun. ACM 50, 1 (Jan. 2007), 36-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1188913.1188915

[2] Sarah Cohen, Werner Nutt, and Yehoshua Sagic. 2007. Deciding equivalences among conjunctive aggregate queries. J. ACM 54, 2, Article 5 (April 2007), 50 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1219092.1219093.

[3] David Kosiur. 2001. Understanding Policy-Based Networking (2nd. ed.). Wiley, New York, NY.

[4] Sten Andler. 1979. Predicate path expressions. In Proceedings of the 6th. ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL '79). ACM Press, New York, NY, 226-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/567752.567774.

-±-

bbac

bac