ABW1.docx

College of Computer and Information Sciences

Assignment

Annotated Bibliography

Need total of 4 due tomorrow 5/21/2018

Research one article on the advantages and disadvantages of choosing between a traditional RDB and a NoSQL Database.

Need total of 4

· The entries should be from the class readings of each week. Don’t try and do the textbook.

· Use a paragraph for each section below. Double spaced, alphabetical by first author last name.

Each annotated bibliography entry should contain the following elements:

1. A bibliographic citation in APA format. This is the same thing you create for the references section of your papers.

2. A summary of the main points and the author's thesis of appropriate length for the book or article. An article of a couple pages is a few sentences. A book might have a short paragraph per chapter.

3. A critical evaluation of the entry. Saying an article is required for the class is not an evaluation. Because you found an article in the Regis library it is not automatically from a credible source. Is it marketing fluff, practical, academic? Is the article superficial or full of meat?

4. Comments on the usefulness of the article to your research such as the date of the publication; whether or not there have been subsequent revisions or editions of the work that would mean it is more authoritative; whether or not the work is from a scholarly, substantive, popular, or sensationalized source, etc. Maybe it’s a good overview but your paper will require some articles of more depth.

5. A critique of the author, including the author's credentials. Many articles provide this information. Doing a quick Google scholar search might also help. Look at the number of publications, if they are peer reviewed, the author’s degrees and area of study. Reputable blogs can be used but the author background research needs to be more than cursory. Marketing whitepapers by companies need to be evaluated with an awareness of the products they are trying to sell.

6. Relevant references in the work. Some authors only list their own other papers. This might say they don’t do real research. It might also indicate that the author does a lot of research in the field. References are great for finding source information such as general overviews and other authors well known in the field.

Annotated Bibliography Rubric

4

3

2

1

Comprehensive

At least 2 sources per week that are related to the EA topics.

N/A

N/A

Less than 2 sources per week.

Quality

All sources are relevant to the topic, and at least 50% are peer-reviewed.

N/A

Most sources are relevant.

Sources are not relevant nor are they academic, peer reviewed articles.

Summary

Summaries are clear, concise, and thorough.

Summaries include all major points, discussion needs to be tightened up

Major points/findings are missing from the summaries

Findings/points are not summarized concisely or thoroughly.

Evaluation

Value of resource is clearly described. Evaluation includes the credibility of the study with respect to author, research design and data analysis. Further research is identified

Evaluation clearly addresses value of source to the field of study.

Evaluation does not address value to the field of study

Little or no evaluation of sources is provided.

Coherence and Language

Entries are well written, concise, and thorough. APA format is followed rigorously.

Entries are well written but could use some work to tighten up language and flow

Minor grammatical errors and occasional lack of coherence

Entries contain significant grammatical and/or structural errors making bibliography difficult to read and comprehend.