Abstract
Dissociative disorder is a mental condition that has a high comorbidity rate with other illness. A most commonly known attribute associated with one of the subcategories of this disorder is exhibiting personalities that are distinct yet exist in the same person at the same time. However, there are three main succinct types of dissociative disorders which include Dissociative Amnesia, Dissociative Identity Disorder, and Depersonalization-derealization Disorder. Through this research paper, the author will highlight some of the potential causes associated with them including the biological, neurological, and physiological factors. Furthermore, a thorough analysis of how these factors affect human development, functioning and behavior will also be explained. In addition to this, the research paper will also point out the processes used to evaluate them, treatment options available as well as a biblical perspective of these disorders as far as their treatment is concerned. Finally, future research considerations in this disorder category will be evaluated; specifically, evidence-based counseling strategies and techniques for prevention and intervention.
Keywords: Dissociative disorders, Dissociative amnesia, Dissociative identity disorder and Depersonalization-derealization disorder
Dissociative Disorders
Aadil, M., & Shoaib, M. (2017). Diagnostic challenges leading to underdiagnosis of
dissociative disorders. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 13, 407-410. doi:10.2147/NDT.S131439
The article focused on the identification, diagnosis, and treatment of dissociative disorder offered to both inpatient and outpatient individuals. The study involved an analysis of various clinical presentations and solutions to dissociative disorders. The results indicated that inappropriate diagnosis measures led to delays in dissociative disorder treatment, and destructive to services. The study concluded that better identification, diagnosis, and treatment of dissociative disorder results to appropriate and cost-effective results.
Brand, B. L. (2012). What we know and what we need to learn about the treatment of
dissociative disorders. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 13(4), 387-396. doi:10.1080/15299732.2012.672550
The article focusses on a review of issues related to research design and contemporary research on treatment for dissociative disorders. The researcher further established the challenges and limitations associated with treatment studies for dissociative disorder patients. A survey was conducted regarding programs that are federally and insurers funded to establish the treatment of the dissociative disorder patients. Besides, the study researched on the standards regarding treatment of the disorder in other nations. The results indicated that successful treatment research for Dissociative disorder required empirical support, particularly financial support. The article concluded that treatment studies for dissociative disorder require sufficient financial support to establish a robust treatment approach.
Brand, B. L., Classen, C. C., McNary, S. W., & Zaveri, P. (2009). A review of dissociative
disorders treatment studies. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 197(9), 646-654. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181b3afaa
The article surveys various empirical reports regarding the treatment for dissociative disorder. The review included four case studies of Dissociative disorders treatment from various countries that utilized standard measures of treatment. Besides, the researchers reviewed reports from studies regarding 16DD treatment outcome. The results from the study indicated that the treatment of the patients with dissociative disorders was associated with a reduction in various symptoms but the research studies on the treatment were limited. The symptoms include suicidality, distress, posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and dissociation. The study concluded that the treatment measures provided in the study had a positive impact on the reduction of the symptoms.
Brand, B. L., Loewenstein, R. J., & Spiegel, D. (2014). Dispelling myths about dissociative
identity disorder treatment: An empirically based approach. Psychiatry, 77(2), 169. doi:10.1521/psyc.2014.77.2.169
The article focused on debunking the debate regarding the painful perception regarding treatment of dissociative disorders. The researchers conducted a review multiple evidences that supported and refuted the assertion. The results from the review indicated that appropriate treatment of dissociative disorder that aligns their treatment with the guidelines provided by professionals resulted in a reduction of the disorder’s symptoms, reduced hospitalization rates, and a reduction in the treatment cost. The study concluded that improvement of the Dissociative Disorder can be achieved through establishment of appropriate psychotherapy measures. However, the persistent of the dissociative symptoms can arise due to inappropriate treatment measures.
Fine, C. G. (2012). Cognitive behavioral hypnotherapy for dissociative disorders. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 54(4), 331-352. doi:10.1080/00029157.2012.656856
The article compares two type of approaches to treatment of dissociative disorders namely; the CBT and hypnotherapy recommended by experts. The procedure involved a comparison of the treatment of clients with the first two stages of outpatient therapist with the recommendation of hypnotherapy by experts. The two approaches establish various similarities and differences. The community therapy approach displayed less focus on revictimization stabilization, containment and grounding skills, and relationally-oriented intervention. The study concluded that the findings from the research were significant in implementation and development of training approaches that would establish the appropriate treatment strategies for dissociative disorder.
Foote, B., & Van Orden, K. (2016). Adapting dialectical behavior therapy for the treatment
of dissociative identity disorder. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 70(4), 343-364. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2016.70.4.343
The researchers conducted a study on the effectiveness of the dialectical behavior therapy in treatment of dissociative disorder. The researchers applied the dialectical behavior therapy on a certain patient suffering from dissociative disorder. Mariella, the patient, was subjected to a two DBT treatment. Previously, Mariella had the motive of killing herself, which she overcame by cutting herself every week. The results indicated a reduction in suicidal and self-harm behavior by Mariella. Therefore, the study concluded that adoption of dialectical behavior therapy was an appropriate strategy towards treatment of dissociative disorder symptoms.
MacIntosh, H. B. (2013). Structure with engagement: Toward an integration of trauma and
relational psychoanalytic models in the treatment of dissociative disorders. Psychoanalytic Social Work, 20(1), 26-49. doi:10.1080/15228878.2012.749798
The article focuses on the integration of trauma model approaches and relational psychoanalytic approaches towards treatment of dissociative disorder. The study is aimed at establishing the possibility of resolving the clinical and theoretical tension between the two approaches. The researchers reviewed the history dissociation in relation to psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic practices. The results indicated that the trauma model provides direction and containment while the relational psychoanalytic model allows for exploration and engagement. The conclusion of the study was about the possibility of integrating the trauma model approach to the relational psychoanalytic approach in obtaining effective treatment for dissociative disorder patients.
Myrick, A. C., Brand, B. L., McNary, S. W., Classen, C. C., Lanius, R., Loewenstein, R. J.,
& Putnam, F. W. (2012). An exploration of young adults' progress in treatment for dissociative disorder. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 13(5), 582-595. doi:10.1080/15299732.2012.694841
The study focused on the treatment response of dissociative disorders patients aged between 18 to 30 years. The individuals under study had undergone a longitudinal and naturalistic treatment of the disorder. The response from the patients indicated a reduction in destructive symptomatology and behavior and enhanced adaptive capacity after a period of 30 months of treatment. Besides, the treatment response of the young generation was aggressive as compared to the response of the older ones. The study concluded that the trauma-focused treatment was beneficial to the dissociative disorders in the young generation and that they are more aggressive to the older ones.
Myrick, A. C., Webermann, A. R., Loewenstein, R. J., Lanius, R., Putnam, F. W., & Brand,
B. L. (2017). Six-year follow-up of the treatment of patients with dissociative disorders study. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 8(1), 1344080-7. doi:10.1080/20008198.2017.1344080
The article focused on establishment of specialized and long-term treatment for dissociative disorder. The researchers conducted a six-year follow-up study, which involved using questionnaires on various therapists to obtain their experience regarding safety, victimization, global functioning, quality of life and stressors of dissociative disorder patients. The results obtained from the therapists indicated a positive impact of the therapist approach to the patients. The therapists claimed that the patients indicated a significant reduction of psychiatric hospitalization, revictimization, and stressors. The study concluded that patients diagnosed with dissociative disorder can benefit from specialized treatment despite the initial difficulty in the treatment approach.
Spiegel, D., Lewis-Fernández, R., Lanius, R., Vermetten, E., Simeon, D., & Friedman, M.
(2013). Dissociative disorders in DSM-5. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 299-326. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185531
The article focused on the use of therapist-DD patient pairs to establish the rate of victimization and revictimization of others among the dissociative disorder patients. The study also aimed at establishing the influence of life stressors and revictimization on the patients. The treatment was conducted on 49 patients in duration of 30 months. The results showed a reduction in the revictimization rate among the patients. Besides, the level of revictimization and stressor to others reduced among the patients. In addition, the study indicated that stressors and revictimization worsened the treatment approach to dissociative disorder. The researchers concluded that stressors and revictimization had an impact on the treatment of dissociative disorder.