ABA 510 M6 Project
zanuyekeh
ABA527M6Project.docxAssignment: PBIS/SW-PBIS Evaluation Review of Tools
Review Two Tools
Description: Based on your A/B/C chosen path, choose and review 2 evaluation tools (see below) that would be pertinent to your path.
Suggested Evaluation Tools:
Select a "Tool" on the PBIS website https://www.pbis.org/tools/all-tools. (Links to an external site.) Be sure to select an actual tool (ex. FACTS, Classroom Management Self-Assessment Revised, PBIS Tiered Fidelity Interview, etc.) OR select from the tools below.
Some other suggested tools to review:
· fba-quality-audit-tool.pdf Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader
· A PQI (Links to an external site.)
· apqi_combined TUT.pdf Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader
· Detailed_ABA_Program_Assessment.pdf Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader
· QualityInclusivePracticesChecklist.pdf Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader
· MHS APERS March 2011.pdf Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader
Select any 2 tools that relate to your path!
Create a brief summary (1 page) of what each evaluation tool addresses and how it fits with your pathway. Please provide what information you will extract from the tool and what you, as a behavior analyst, can do with the information you gather from it (pros and cons of the tool). Be sure to clearly list/cite tools you are reviewing.
· Suggestions:
· Path A: focus on FBA/BSP and classroom integration
· Path B: focus on PBIS and classroom management implementation
· Path C: focus on fidelity of school-wide behavior systems
Part Two: Develop a Tool
Description: Develop a tool that will allow you to reflect on your consultation services from your own point of view. Consider the development of this as a means for continuous improvement on your part. As you provide services to others what is your goal, what are your expected outcomes, did you deliver what you promised, etc.? Provide a minimum of 2 references in APA format
Here are samples from past semesters...
Rubric
Project Rubric 6
|
Project Rubric 6 |
|||||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation tools selected align with chosen path |
|
3 pts |
|||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribes how evaluation tool fits with chosen path |
|
4 pts |
|||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and thorough evaluation of pros/cons of each tool |
|
4 pts |
|||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBrief summary of each tool |
|
4 pts |
|||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWell-organized and well-written |
|
4 pts |
|||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreates a meaningful evaluation tool that allows you to reflect on your consultation services |
|
5 pts |
|||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMinimum of 2 references in ABA format |
|
1 pts |
|||
|
Total Points: 25 |
