ABA 510 Myths

profilezanuyekeh
ABA510M8finalPaperDraft.docx

Final Paper-DRAFT

Final Paper-DRAFT

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing: Focua & Sequencing (see APA 4.1-4.11)

10 pts

Excellent (100%)

All material clearly related to subtopic, main topic. Strong organization and integration of material within subtopics. Strong transitions linking subtopics, and main topic. Writing is flowing and easy to follow

9 pts

Good (1-10% loss)

All material clearly related to subtopic, main topic and logically organized within subtopics. Clear, varied transitions linking subtopics, and main topic. Writing has minimal awkward or unclear passages.

8 pts

Acceptable (11%-20% loss)

Most material clearly related to subtopic, main topic. Material may not be organized within subtopics. Limited transitions linking subtopics and main topic. Writing has a few awkward or unclear passages.

7 pts

Unacceptable (Below Standards) (21%-100% loss)

Little evidence material is logically organized into topic, subtopics, or related to topic. Many transitions are unclear or nonexistent. Writing is choppy, with many awkward or unclear passages.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Appropriate Sources: Support (see APA 8.1-8.6)

5 pts

Excellent (100%)

Strong peer-reviewed research-based support for thesis

4.5 pts

Good (1-10% loss)

Sources well selected to support thesis with mostly peer-reviewed research.

4 pts

Acceptable (11%-20% loss)

Sources generally acceptable but not peer-reviewed research (evidence-based.)

3 pts

Unacceptable (Below Standards) (21%-100% loss)

Few sources supporting thesis. Sources insignificant or unsubstantiated.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

5 pts

Excellent (100%)

Strong review of key conclusions. Strong integration with thesis statement. Insightful discussion of impact of the researched material on topic.

4.5 pts

Good (1-10% loss)

Strong review of key conclusions. Strong integration with thesis statement. Discusses impact of researched material on topic.

4 pts

Acceptable(11%-20% loss)

Review of key conclusions. Some integration with thesis statement. Discusses impact of researched material on topic.

3 pts

Unacceptable (Below Standards) (21%-100% loss)

Does not summarize evidence with respect to thesis statement. Does not discuss the impact of researched material on topic.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar & Mechanics (see APA Chapter 4 and Chapter 6)

5 pts

Excellent (100%)

Paper is free of grammatical, spelling, & punctuation errors.

4.5 pts

Good (1-10% loss)

Grammatical, spelling, & punctuation errors are rare and do not detract from the paper.

4 pts

Acceptable (11%-20% loss)

A few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors which interfere with reading paper.

3 pts

Unacceptable (Below Standards) (21%-100% loss)

Grammatical, spelling, & punctuation errors substantially detract from the paper.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style (see APA 1.0 and Chapter 2)

5 pts

Excellent (100%)

Consistent use of APA style (title page, double-spacing, running head, font, indentations, headings). Scholarly style.

4.5 pts

Good (1-10% loss)

Rare errors in APA style.

4 pts

Acceptable (11%-20% loss)

Errors in APA style are noticeable. Word choice occasionally informal in tone

3 pts

Unacceptable (Below Standards) (21%-100% loss)

Errors in APA style detract substantially from the paper. Word choice is informal in tone.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations & References (See APA Chapter 8, 9 & 10)

5 pts

Excellent (100%)

All references and citations are correctly written and present, no quotes used.

4.5 pts

Good (1-10% loss)

Rarely references or citations are missing or incorrectly written, one to two quotes used.

4 pts

Acceptable (11%-20% loss)

A few references or citations missing or incorrectly written, three to four quotes used.

3 pts

Unacceptable (21%-100% loss)

Reference and citation errors detract significantly from paper, four or more quotes used.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMet Expectations

5 pts

Excellent (100%)

Included topical paper checklist and met page requirement

0 pts

Unacceptable (Below Standards) (21%-100% loss)

Did not include topical paper checklist and/or did not meet page requirement

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Integrity (See ABA Student Handbook and APA 8.2-8.3)

10 pts

Excellent (100%)

Similarity score is equal to or less than 25% (subject to professor evaluation)

5 pts

Unacceptable (Below Standards) (21%-100% loss)

Similarity score above 25% (subject to professor evaluation)

10 pts

Total Points: 50