Order 862853: What issues may arise when small luxury [fashion] brands try to expand globally and how can the risk of failure be mitigated during the execution of their global plan?
Annexure 1: Dissertation Marking Criteria
|
NB: Word lengths are for guidance only |
Marks available |
Marks awarded |
|
Introduction (500 words) |
5 |
|
|
Literature Review (2000 words) |
30 |
|
|
Methods (300 words) |
5 |
|
|
Recommendations / Analysis (1500 words) |
45 |
|
|
Conclusion (700 words) |
5 |
|
|
Presentation |
10 |
|
|
SUB TOTAL |
100 |
|
|
Presentation (10 marks) |
||
|
A high standard of presentation is expected. Marks can be deducted for any of the following inadequacies of presentation: |
|
|
|
Referencing (requirements below) |
|
|
|
Sufficient referencing to support arguments |
|
|
|
Correct use of the Harvard system |
|
|
|
In-text citation included bibliography |
|
|
|
Bibliographic citation appears in text |
|
|
|
Formatting (requirements below) |
|
|
|
Comply with the specified formatting instructions |
|
|
|
General presentation (requirements below) |
|
|
|
Adequate and clear abstract |
|
|
|
Inclusion of · illegible tables and diagrams · tables and diagrams without captions · tables and diagrams without source references (where appropriate) |
|
|
|
Minimal errors of grammar that inhibit understanding |
|
|
|
Minimal spelling errors/typos |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DETAILED MARKING CRITERIA & COMMENT SHEET |
||
|
Introduction (500 words) |
Max 5 marks |
Comments |
|
Is the rationale/justification for the research clearly explained? |
|
|
|
Are the research question(s), hypotheses, aims and objectives clearly stated? |
|
|
|
Literature Review (1500 words) |
Max 30 marks |
|
|
Has appropriate literature been chosen for review? |
|
|
|
Is there sufficient competence displayed in the critical evaluation of the literature? · Is the student able to evaluate critically the literature selected to review? · Are the points well made? Are they based on the evidence presented? · Is evidence used well to support the opinion being expressed? · Can the student synthesise an argument? |
|
|
|
Is the review broad / extensive enough? |
|
|
|
Methods (300 words) |
Max 5 marks |
|
|
Have appropriate methods been used to tackle the research question/problem? |
|
|
|
Is there an adequate explanation of how the methods were used? |
|
|
|
Is there an adequate explanation of the data collection process and choices made (e.g. sampling, selection of data base, conceptual framework)? (where appropriate) |
|
|
|
Is there an awareness of any limitations in the approach taken? |
|
|
|
Analysis & Findings (1500 words) |
Max 45 marks |
|
|
Has the material been presented effectively through the use of appropriate summaries/tables/diagrams or other appropriate presentation devices? |
|
|
|
Has the material been analysed rather than described? |
|
|
|
Is there evidence of the competent use of specific techniques (at a level appropriate for an UG student)? |
|
|
|
Is the student able to evaluate critically the material they have collected? · Is there evidence of the ability to draw effective inferences or conclusions from the analysis? · Are the implications of the results/findings discussed adequately? · Is there an attempt to relate the results/findings to the literature reviewed? · Are the results/findings used explicitly to answer the original question? |
|
|
|
Conclusion (500 words) |
Max 5 marks |
|
|
Has the contribution to knowledge been adequately identified by highlighting the benefits or potential applications of the knowledge derived from the study? |
|
|
|
Are limitations adequately discussed? |
|
|
|
Are areas for possible further study identified? |
|
|