Assessment 2

7/16/2019 Asian Management (Trimester 2A 2019 Singapore Campus - INT[1])

https://lms.curtin.edu.au/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_54525_1&course_id=_88806_1 1/3

A2: Group Portfolio

  Levels of Achievement

Criteria Below Expectations (Fail) 0- 49

Meets Expectations (Pass) 50-59

Meets Expectations (Credit) 60-69

Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 70-79

Exceeds Expectations (High Distinction) 80-100

2.1.1 Issue (CT) 0.00 to 49.00 %

• The issue/problem to be considered critically is not clearly stated and described. • There are serious omissions and/or errors.

50.00 to 59.00 %

• The issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described with enough information for an adequate understanding. • There are several omissions and/or errors.

60.00 to 69.00 %

• The issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively for an adequate understanding. • There are some omissions and/or errors

70.00 to 79.00 %

• The issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described thoroughly. • There are only minor omissions and/or errors.

80.00 to 100.00 %

• The issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, succinctly delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding. • There are no omissions and/or errors.

2.1.2 Evidence- based Analysis (CT)

0.00 to 49.00 %

• The analysis is super�cial and based on irrelevant information, concepts and methods. • The information analysed is gathered from very limited source(s) or only those provided.

50.00 to 59.00 %

• A coherent analysis is based on partial use of relevant information, concepts and methods. • The information analysed is gathered from some relevant source(s) beyond those provided.

60.00 to 69.00 %

• A coherent analysis is based on relevant information, concepts and methods. • The information analysed is gathered from several source(s) beyond those provided.

70.00 to 79.00 %

• A coherent analysis is based on thorough use of the most relevant information, concepts and methods • The information analysed is gathered from many diverse, relevant source(s) beyond those provided

80.00 to 100.00 %

• A comprehensive analysis is based on a deep understanding of relevant information, concepts and methods. • Information analysed is from many diverse, high quality source(s) beyond those provided.

3.1.4 Sources and Evidence (WC)

0.00 to 49.00 %

• Inconsistent use of credible, relevant sources and/or data to support ideas that are situated within the discipline and genre of the writing.

50.00 to 59.00 %

• Demonstrates some use of credible, relevant sources and/or data to support ideas that are situated within the discipline and genre of the writing.

60.00 to 69.00 %

• Demonstrates consistent use of credible, relevant sources and/or data to support ideas that are situated within the discipline and genre of the writing.

70.00 to 79.00 %

• Demonstrates consistent use of a range of credible, relevant sources and/or data to support key ideas that are pertinent to the discipline and genre of the writing.

80.00 to 100.00 %

• Demonstrates skilful use of high-quality, credible, relevant sources and/or data to develop in depth ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing.

Name

Description

Rubric Detail

Weight 12.50%

Weight 12.50%

Weight 12.50%

7/16/2019 Asian Management (Trimester 2A 2019 Singapore Campus - INT[1])

https://lms.curtin.edu.au/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_54525_1&course_id=_88806_1 2/3

  Levels of Achievement

Criteria Below Expectations (Fail) 0- 49

Meets Expectations (Pass) 50-59

Meets Expectations (Credit) 60-69

Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 70-79

Exceeds Expectations (High Distinction) 80-100

3.1.5 Control of Syntax and Mechanics (WC)

0.00 to 49.00 %

• Did not use language that conveys meaning to readers with su�cient clarity and includes some errors.

50.00 to 59.00 %

• Uses language su�ciently well to convey basic meaning although errors reduce e�ectiveness of communication.

60.00 to 69.00 %

• Uses language that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity and writing is virtually error free.

70.00 to 79.00 %

• Uses language that e�ectively conveys meaning to readers with clarity. Any errors which occur do not reduce e�ectiveness of communication.

80.00 to 100.00 %

• Uses language that skilfully communicates meaning to readers with clarity and �uency, and is error-free

4.1.1 Works Independently within a group context (TW)

0.00 to 49.00 %

• Rarely completes all individual assigned tasks by deadline. • The work accomplished does not always contribute to group goals. • Anticipates and resolves few unexpected issues to enhance project outcomes.

50.00 to 59.00 %

• Completes most individual assigned tasks by deadline Majority of the work accomplished contributes to group goals.

60.00 to 69.00 %

• Comprehensively completes all individual assigned tasks by deadline in a way that contributes to group goals. • Anticipates and resolves most unexpected issues to enhance project outcomes.

70.00 to 79.00 %

• Comprehensively completes all individual assigned tasks by deadline • All completed tasks contribute to group goals.

80.00 to 100.00 %

• Meticulously and comprehensively completes all individual assigned tasks by deadline in a way that enhances group goals. • Anticipates and resolves all unexpected issues to enhance project outcomes.

4.1.2 Works Collaboratively (TW)

0.00 to 49.00 %

• Rarely works collaboratively with others to foster a positive team environment and re�ect on, evaluate and achieve team goals.

50.00 to 59.00 %

• Occasionally works to foster a positive team environment, and re�ect on, evaluate and achieve team goals.

60.00 to 69.00 %

• Works collaboratively with others to foster a positive team environment and re�ect on, evaluate and achieve team goals.

70.00 to 79.00 %

• Consistently works to foster a positive team environment, and re�ect on, evaluate and achieve team goals. • Occasionally demonstrates leadership in fostering a positive team.

80.00 to 100.00 %

• Works collaboratively with others to foster a positive team environment and re�ect on, evaluate and achieve team goals. • Proactively motivates other team members to complete their assigned tasks to enhance project outcomes.

5.2.1 Analysis of Knowledge (SC)

0.00 to 49.00 %

• Scenarios are analysed with an incomplete connection to one’s own socio-cultural perspective(s).

50.00 to 59.00 %

• Scenarios are analysed with some connection to one’s own socio-cultural perspective(s).

60.00 to 69.00 %

• Scenarios are analysed with signi�cant connection to one’s own socio-cultural perspective(s).

70.00 to 79.00 %

• Scenarios are independently analysed from diverse socio- cultural perspective(s).

80.00 to 100.00 %

• Scenarios are comprehensively analysed from diverse socio- cultural perspectives

Weight 12.50%

Weight 12.50%

Weight 12.50%

Weight 12.50%

7/16/2019 Asian Management (Trimester 2A 2019 Singapore Campus - INT[1])

https://lms.curtin.edu.au/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_54525_1&course_id=_88806_1 3/3

  Levels of Achievement

Criteria Below Expectations (Fail) 0- 49

Meets Expectations (Pass) 50-59

Meets Expectations (Credit) 60-69

Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 70-79

Exceeds Expectations (High Distinction) 80-100

5.2.3 Knowledge of cultural worldview frameworks (SC)

0.00 to 49.00 %

• Demonstrates limited knowledge of the complexity of elements important to members of another culture.

50.00 to 59.00 %

• Demonstrates knowledge of the elements important to members of another culture.

60.00 to 69.00 %

• Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the complexity of elements to members of another culture.

70.00 to 79.00 %

• Independently demonstrates comprehensive knowledge of the complexity of elements in multi-cultural scenarios.

80.00 to 100.00 %

• Demonstrates comprehensive and empathetic knowledge of the complexity of elements in multi- cultural scenarios.

Weight 12.50%

View Associated Items

Print Close Window