2 Question cultural

Assessment 2: 4 Principle ‘Essay’ 40% • Learning Outcomes: Demonstrate their understanding of themselves as multi-dimensional cultural beings in society.

• Analyse the dynamic interactions of themselves and others in a variety of cultural contexts.

• Identify, access, evaluate, organise and communicate information.

HD (85-100) D (75-84) C (65-74) Pass (50-64) Fail (0-49) Total

Content

(55%)

Shows significant understanding of how

and why the readings and concepts relate

to personal observations and experiences,

and IAT results. Demonstrates cultural

self-awareness, cultural intelligence, and

equity literacy. Demonstrates extensive

understanding in the use of readings.

55 43 41 40 49

Shows depth of understanding of

how and why the readings and

concepts relate to personal

observations and experiences, and

IAT results. Demonstrates cultural

self-awareness, cultural intelligence,

and equity literacy. Demonstrates

adequate understanding in the use of

readings. 48 37 36 35 44

Shows a reasonable understanding of how and why the readings and concepts relate to personal observations and experiences, and IAT results. Demonstrates cultural self-awareness, cultural intelligence, and equity literacy. The reflection demonstrates a use of the readings. 43 32 31 30 39

Shows some understanding of how the readings and concepts relate to personal observations and experiences, and IAT results. Demonstrates cultural self- awareness, cultural intelligence, and equity literacy. Demonstrates inconsistent or superficial use of readings. 38.5 27 26 25 24 23 32.5

Shows very little understanding of the readings and concepts, nor relates to personal observations and experiences, and IAT results. Demonstrates cultural self-awareness, cultural intelligence, and equity literacy. Demonstrates insufficient or no use of readings. 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 15

Organisation

(20%)

The organisation is extremely logical; paragraph structure (TEEL) is unified and exceptionally coherent. There is a clear and easy-to- follow sequence of ideas in response to each question. There is no unnecessary duplication of ideas or Information. 20 19 18 17

The organisation is logical; paragraph

structure (TEEL) is consistent and

coherent. There is a clear and easy-to-

follow sequence of ideas in response to

each question. There is very little

unnecessary duplication of ideas or

information. 16 15

The organisation is mostly logical; paragraph structure (TEEL) is coherent. There is a clear sequence of ideas in response to each question. There is a little duplication of ideas or information. 14.5 14 13

The organisation is somewhat logical; paragraph structure (TEEL) is a little unclear and/or incoherent. At times the sequence of ideas is difficult to follow. There is some duplication of ideas and/ or gaps in information. 12.5 12 11 10

The organisation is unclear there is little attempt to use paragraph structure (TEEL). The sequence of ideas is limited or non-existent. There is much duplication of ideas and/or gaps in information. 9.5 9 8 7 6 5 4

Referencing

(15%)

Sources from at least 5 set readings are

clearly integrated and advance the

viewpoint through accurate use of

summary, paraphrase, and quotation. The

reflection consistently and accurately uses

APA in-text referencing style and reference

list (bibliography). Source materials flow

smoothly into the writer’s own text. 15 14

13 13.5 13

Sources from at least 5 set readings are clearly related to and advance the viewpoint through accurate and appropriate use of summary, paraphrase and quotation. Use of APA in-text referencing style and reference list (bibliography) is mostly accurate; only one or two errors.

12.5 12 11.5

There is a consistent attempt to use sources from at least 5 set readings to substantiate ideas, but these are not always integrated well. Appropriate use of summary, paraphrase and quotation. APA in-text referencing style and reference list (bibliography), however some errors present.

11 10.5 10

Sources from 5 set readings may be used non-critically, may lack variety, or is mostly limited to quotation. There are some errors in APA in text referencing and reference list style which interferes with the reader’s ability to check sources.

9.5 9 8.5 8 7.5

Use of source material is insufficient, or is not referred to all, or the student relies heavily on quotations. There are many errors in the APA in text referencing and list style or there is no clear referencing system. Inadequate use of set readings

7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

Punctuation,

Grammar and

Spelling

(10%)

Reflection has no errors in word selection and use of spelling, punctuation and grammar. Exceptional use of conventions of edited standard written English.

10 9.5 9 8.5

Reflection is relatively free of errors in word selection and use of spelling, punctuation and capitalisation. Effective use of the conventions of edited standard written English. 8 7.5

Reflection is good, but with some errors in word selection and use of spelling, punctuation or capitalisation. Good use of the conventions of edited standard written English. However, some errors are present. 7 6.5

Reflection contains several major errors in

word selection and use of spelling,

punctuation and/or capitalisation.

Attempted use of conventions of edited

standard written English. However, many

errors are present. 6 5

Errors in grammar and punctuation are so frequent that it makes it difficult to read or understand.

4.5 4 3 2

Comments

Total