Patinet : A-Zebby

Chamberlain College of Nursing NR324 Adult Health I

NR324 Case Study Presentation.docx Revised 05/7/2013 CIS 1

Required Uniform Assignment Guidelines:

Case Study Presentation PURPOSE The purpose of this assignment is to help students build communication skills, utilize evidence-based research relevant to nursing practice, and apply concepts of safety and quality in nursing care of adults. The goals of this assignment are to:

• foster teamwork and collaboration through effective communication • utilize research evidence to promote safe and quality nursing care for adults in acute care

settings.

COURSE OUTCOMES This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1. Provide effective professional nursing care for adult patients and their families in acute care settings using the nursing process. (PO#1)

CO 3. Demonstrate effective communication skills necessary for collaboration with other health care team members and for providing professional nursing care to adult patients and their families. (PO #3)

CO 4. Apply critical thinking strategies to make good clinical decisions in the adult patient clinical setting. (PO#4)

CO 8. Utilize nursing research literature while providing care to adult patients and their families in acute care settings. (PO #8)

DUE DATE: See Course Calendar. TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 100 POINTS REQUIREMENTS AND DIRECTIONS The student group must develop a case study based on an actual or potential clinical-based situation on the adult health topics presented during the 8-week session. The student group must present the topic and literature for the case scenario.

Chamberlain College of Nursing NR324 Adult Health I

NR324 Case Study Presentation.docx Revised 05/7/2013 CIS 2

Students must include the following information in the case study presentation:

A. Health History – age, gender, ethnicity, past and current medical history, chief complaint, and history of present illness on admission.

B. Laboratory/Diagnostic Testing – describe the diagnostic tests ordered/completed, pertinent results (include normal and abnormal ranges), and rationales for each diagnostic test.

C. Collaborative Management – provide list of medications, treatments, dietary prescriptions, and procedures that have been ordered, administered, completed, and/or pending. Additionally, provide an overview of members of the healthcare team involved in managing the person and family. Briefly list their role in the care provided and how nursing collaborates in meeting interdisciplinary goals.

D. Nursing management – using the nursing process, develop two plans of care - 1 related to physiological nursing diagnosis and 1 related to psychosocial nursing diagnosis. Please include the following information in each plan of care:

• Priority nursing diagnosis • 1 short and 1 long-term goal • 3 to 5 nursing interventions with rationale statements, • 3 to 5 evaluative statements based on interventions, and • A minimum of 3 teaching considerations.

Assignment Submission Requirements:

• Students must receive approval from the faculty on the selected topic for the case study presentation assignment. The faculty will facilitate selection of topics during class.

• Each student in the group must contribute to the development of the case study information.

• Students must submit a 1-page typed copy of the case study and a 1-page typed copy of the plans of care. Follow the criteria under the nursing management section.

• Students may choose to submit a concept map instead of a plan of care. The concept map must incorporate the same information required for the plans of care.

• Each student group must submit reference materials with the assignment. A minimum of at least three (3) references are required for this assignment. Student must use at least two (2) research or evidence-based practice (EBP) articles. Resources must be within 5 years of publication.

• Each student group must give a 15 minute presentation and allow an additional 5 minutes for questions and answers on a topic relevant to their didactic content and/or clinical experience.

Each group member must present a topic from the case study, plan of care or concept map. If a student in the group is absent the day of the presentation, the student group will not be penalized.

• APA (6th ed.) format must be used for the assignment.

Chamberlain College of Nursing NR324 Adult Health I

NR324 Case Study Presentation.docx Revised 05/7/2013 CIS 3

Names of Students in Group: __________________________ _____________________________ ____________________________ __________________________ ____________________________ ___________________________ Topic: _______________________________________ Date of Presentation: ________________ GRADING CRITERIA

Category Points % Description

Health History 10 10% Presents pertinent and relevant information on: the person’s age, gender, ethnicity, past and current medical history, chief complaint, and history of present illness on admission.

Laboratory & Diagnostic Testing

10 10% Presents description of the ordered/completed diagnostic tests, pertinent results (including normal and abnormal ranges), and rationales for each diagnostic test.

Collaborative Management

20 20% Presents list of medications, treatments, dietary prescriptions, and procedures that have been ordered, administered, completed, and/or pending Additionally, provide an overview of members of the healthcare team involved in managing the person and family. Briefly list their role in the care provided and how nursing collaborates in meeting interdisciplinary goals.

Nursing Management *Each plan of care is worth 15 points.

30 30% Utilized the nursing process to develop two plans of care • 1 physiological and 1 psychosocial nursing diagnoses

Included the following information in each* plan of care: • Priority nursing diagnosis • 1 short-term and 1 long-term goal • 3 - 5 nursing interventions with rationale statements • 3 - 5 evaluative statements based on interventions • A minimum of 3 teaching considerations

Case Study Presentation

25 25% • All components of the assignment guidelines included. • Information presented in a logical, interesting sequence which audience can

follow. • Participation by all group members. • All presenters are professional and demonstrated appropriate presence

throughout presentation. • Used presentation materials and methods effectively. • Responded appropriately to audience questions.

APA Format & References

5 5% • Used APA (6th ed.) format. • Used at least three (3) different sources, with at least two (2) from research

literature.

TOTAL 100 100%

Chamberlain College of Nursing NR324 Adult Health I

NR324 Case Study Presentation.docx Revised 05/7/2013 CIS 4

GRADING RUBRIC

Assignment Criteria

Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance

A (92–100%)

Very Good or High Level of Performance B (84–91%)

Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance

C (76–83%)

Poor, Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance

F (0–75%)

Case Study Information: Health History (10 points)

• Comprehensively presents key/relevant Information accurately and in sufficient detail: person’s age, gender, ethnicity, past and current medical history, chief complaint, and history of present illness on admission.

• Information presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner

10 points

• One of the key/relevant Information not presented: person’s age, gender, ethnicity, past and current medical history, chief complaint, and history of present illness on admission.

• Key/relevant information are accurate and presented in sufficient detail.

• Information presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner

9 points

• Two of the key/relevant Information not presented: person’s age, gender, ethnicity, past and current medical history, chief complaint, and history of present illness on admission.

• Key/relevant information may be inaccurate and/or insufficient in detail.

• Information presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner

8 points

• 3 or more of the key/relevant Information not presented: person’s age, gender, ethnicity, past and current medical history, chief complaint, and history of present illness on admission.

• Key/relevant information may be inaccurate and/or insufficient in detail.

• Information is not clear, organized, or professional in appearance.

0–7 points

Case Study Information: Laboratory & Diagnostic Testing (10 points)

• Comprehensively presents key/relevant Information accurately and in sufficient detail: description of the ordered/completed diagnostic tests, pertinent results (normal and abnormal ranges), and rationales for each diagnostic test.

• Information presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner

• One of the key/relevant Information not presented: description of the ordered/ completed diagnostic tests, pertinent results (normal and abnormal ranges), and rationales for each diagnostic test.

• Key/relevant information are accurate and presented in sufficient detail.

• Information presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner

• Two of the key/relevant Information not presented: description of the ordered/ completed diagnostic tests, pertinent results (normal and abnormal ranges), and rationales for each diagnostic test.

• Key/relevant information are accurate and presented in sufficient detail.

• Information presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner

• 3 or more of the key/relevant Information not presented: description of the ordered/ completed diagnostic tests, pertinent results (normal and abnormal ranges), and rationales for each diagnostic test.

• Key/relevant information may be inaccurate and/or insufficient in detail.

• Information is not clear, organized, or professional in appearance.

Chamberlain College of Nursing NR324 Adult Health I

NR324 Case Study Presentation.docx Revised 05/7/2013 CIS 5

Assignment Criteria

Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance

A (92–100%)

Very Good or High Level of Performance B (84–91%)

Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance

C (76–83%)

Poor, Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance

F (0–75%)

10 points 9 points 8 points 0–7 points

Case Study Information: Collaborative Management

(20 points)

• Comprehensive discussion of collaborative management including: list of medications, treatments, dietary prescriptions, and procedures that have been ordered, administered, completed, and/or pending.

• Complete overview of members of the healthcare team involved in managing the person and family; Listed ALL key/relevant roles in the care provided and how nursing collaborates in meeting interdisciplinary goals.

• Information presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner.

19–20 points

• Discussed collaborative management, but does not include 1of these items: list of medications, treatments, dietary prescriptions, and procedures that have been ordered, administered, completed, and/or pending.

• Complete overview of members of the healthcare team involved in managing the person and family; Listed most of the key/relevant roles in the care provided and how nursing collaborates in meeting interdisciplinary goals.

• Information presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner.

17-18 points

• Discussed collaborative management, but does not include 2 of these items: list of medications, treatments, dietary prescriptions, and procedures that have been ordered, administered, completed, and/or pending.

• General overview of members of the healthcare team involved in managing the person and family; Listed SOME key/relevant roles in the care provided and how nursing collaborates in meeting interdisciplinary goals.

• Information is not presented in a clear, organized, and/or professional manner.

16 points

• Poor/Minimal discussion of collaborative management which does not include 3 or more of these items: list of medications, treatments, dietary prescriptions, and procedures that have been ordered, administered, completed, and/or pending.

• Poor/Broad overview of members of the healthcare team involved in managing the person and family; Listed SOME of key/relevant roles in the care provided and how nursing collaborates in meeting interdisciplinary goals.

• Information is not presented in a clear, organized, and/or professional manner.

0–15 points

Case Study Information: Nursing Management (30 points*)

• Used the nursing process to develop a plan of care for physiological nursing diagnosis

All information in the plan of

• Used the nursing process to develop a plan of care for physiological nursing diagnosis

Missing 1 item of information

• Used the nursing process to develop a plan of care for physiological nursing diagnosis

Missing 2 items of information

• Used the nursing process to develop a plan of care for physiological nursing diagnosis

Missing 3 or more items of

Chamberlain College of Nursing NR324 Adult Health I

NR324 Case Study Presentation.docx Revised 05/7/2013 CIS 6

Assignment Criteria

Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance

A (92–100%)

Very Good or High Level of Performance B (84–91%)

Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance

C (76–83%)

Poor, Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance

F (0–75%)

*Each plan of care is worth 15 points.

care included: o Priority nursing diagnosis o 1 short-term and 1 long-

term goal o 3 - 5 nursing interventions

with rationale statements o 3 - 5 evaluative statements

based on interventions o A minimum of 3 teaching

considerations 14-15 points

------------------------------------ • Used the nursing process to

develop a plan of care for psychosocial nursing diagnosis

All information in the plan of care included: o Priority nursing diagnosis o 1 short-term and 1 long-

term goal o 3 - 5 nursing interventions

with rationale statements o 3 - 5 evaluative statements

based on interventions o A minimum of 3 teaching

considerations 14-15 points

in the plan of care: o Priority nursing diagnosis o 1 short-term and 1 long-

term goal o 3 - 5 nursing interventions

with rationale statements o 3 - 5 evaluative statements

based on interventions o A minimum of 3 teaching

considerations 13 points

----------------------------------- • Used the nursing process to

develop a plan of care for psychosocial nursing diagnosis

Missing 1 item of information in the plan of care: o Priority nursing diagnosis o 1 short-term and 1 long-

term goal o 3 - 5 nursing interventions

with rationale statements o 3 - 5 evaluative statements

based on interventions o A minimum of 3 teaching

considerations 13 points

in the plan of care: o Priority nursing diagnosis o 1 short-term and 1 long-

term goal o 3 - 5 nursing interventions

with rationale statements o 3 - 5 evaluative statements

based on interventions o A minimum of 3 teaching

considerations 12 points

------------------------------------- • Used the nursing process to

develop a plan of care for psychosocial nursing diagnosis

Missing 2 items of information in the plan of care: o Priority nursing diagnosis o 1 short-term and 1 long-

term goal o 3 - 5 nursing interventions

with rationale statements o 3 - 5 evaluative statements

based on interventions o A minimum of 3 teaching

considerations 12 points

information in the care plan: o Priority nursing diagnosis o 1 short-term and 1 long-

term goal o 3 - 5 nursing interventions

with rationale statements o 3 - 5 evaluative statements

based on interventions o A minimum of 3 teaching

considerations 0-11 points

------------------------------------ • Used the nursing process to

develop a plan of care for psychosocial nursing diagnosis

Missing 3 or more items of information in the care plan: o Priority nursing diagnosis o 1 short-term and 1 long-

term goal o 3 - 5 nursing interventions

with rationale statements o 3 - 5 evaluative statements

based on interventions o A minimum of 3 teaching

considerations 0-11 points

Chamberlain College of Nursing NR324 Adult Health I

NR324 Case Study Presentation.docx Revised 05/7/2013 CIS 7

Assignment Criteria

Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance

A (92–100%)

Very Good or High Level of Performance B (84–91%)

Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance

C (76–83%)

Poor, Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance

F (0–75%)

Case Study Presentation (25 points)

• ALL required assignment components are present.

• Information is presented in a logical sequence; main ideas easy for the audience to follow.

• Participation is by all group members.

• Presenters are professional • Presenters maintained

appropriate eye contact with audience and projected voices for all audience to hear.

• Presenters addressed audience questions appropriately.

• Used presentation materials and methods effectively.

• Presenters stayed within allotted 20-minute timeframe.

23-25 points

• ONE required assignment component is missing.

• Information is presented in a logical sequence; main ideas easy for the audience to follow.

• Participation is by all group members.

• Presenters are professional. • Presenters have limited eye

contact OR the audience has difficulty hearing the presenters.

• Presenters addressed audience questions appropriately.

• Used presentation materials and methods effectively.

• Presenters stayed within allotted 20-minute timeframe.

21-22 points

• 1-2 required assignment components are missing.

• Information is not presented in a logical sequence, yet main ideas are still obvious.

• Participation is by all group members.

• Presenters are professional. • Presenters have limited eye

contact OR the audience has difficulty hearing the presenters.

• Presenters addressed audience questions appropriately.

• Used presentation materials and methods effectively.

• Presenters stayed within 5 minutes of the allotted 20- minute timeframe.

19-20 points

• 3 or more required assignment components are missing.

• There is no logical sequence to presentation of material; main ideas difficult to follow.

• Some members did not participate.

• Some or ALL presenters are unprofessional.

• Presenters have limited eye contact OR the audience has difficulty hearing the presenters.

• Presenters did not address audience questions appropriately.

• Did not effectively use presentation materials and methods.

• Presenters stayed within 5-10 minutes of the allotted 20 minute time frame.

0–18 points

APA Format & References (5 points)

• More than 3 references used, at least 2 are research articles

• References submitted with assignment

• Exactly 3 references used, at least 2 are research articles

• References submitted with assignment

• Citations and references are

• Two (2) references used, at least 1 is a research article

• References submitted with assignment

• Citations and references are

• One to Two references used, but are NOT research articles

• References submitted with assignment

• Citations and references are

Chamberlain College of Nursing NR324 Adult Health I

NR324 Case Study Presentation.docx Revised 05/7/2013 CIS 8

Assignment Criteria

Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance

A (92–100%)

Very Good or High Level of Performance B (84–91%)

Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance

C (76–83%)

Poor, Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance

F (0–75%)

• Citations and references are listed using APA format (6th ed.) and are free of errors.

5 points

listed using APA format (6th ed.), but has one type of error.

4.5 points

listed using APA format (6th ed.), but have two types of errors.

4 points

listed using APA format for citations and, but have three or more types of errors.

0–3 points

Total Points Possible = 100 points Points Earned = _______ points