midterm 3666
8/18/2015
1
Prepared by Emily Berthelot, University of Arkansas at Little Rock ©
2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
CHAPTER THREE
VICTIMIZATION IN
THE UNITED STATES:
AN OVERVIEW
1. To appreciate how statistics can be used to answer important
questions.
2. To become aware of the ways statistics can be used to
persuade and mislead.
3. To find out what information about crime victims is collected
routinely by the federal government‘s Department of Justice.
4. To become familiar with the ways that victimologists use this
data to estimate how many people were harmed by criminal
activities and what injuries and losses they suffered.
5. To explore the kinds of information about victims that can be
found in the Federal Bureau of Investigation‘s annual Uniform
Crime Report.
Learning Objectives
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
6. To become aware of the strengths and weaknesses of this
source of official statistics.
7. To assemble official statistics to spot trends, and especially
whether the problem of criminal victimization has been
intensifying or diminishing over recent decades.
8. To develop a feel for historical trends in the level of violence
in the United States
9. To be able to weigh the threat of crime against other perils by
understanding comparative risks.
Learning Objectives
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
8/18/2015
2
Introduction
The Big Picture How many people are harmed by criminals each year?
Is victimization becoming more of a problem or is it subsiding?
Which groups are targeted?
When and where do crimes occur?
What types of and how often are weapons used?
Are victims usually strangers?
Do victims resist? Should they?
How often are victims injured?
What do victims lose?
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Introduction
How do we ―put together‖ the Big
Picture?
Official statistics gathered by
government
Criminologists and victimologists
gather their own data
Special interest groups gather crime
data
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Use and Abuse of Statistics
Statistics—meaningful numbers that reveal
important information
Official statistics—compiled and
published by government
Statistics—
Provide realistic assessments of a threat
posed to individuals by criminal activity
Reveal patterns of criminal activity
Reflect trends in criminal activity © 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
8/18/2015
3
Use and Abuse of Statistics
Statistics –continued–
Reveal costs and losses by criminal activity
Project number of possible victims of a
particular crime
Evaluate effectiveness of recovery efforts
and prevention strategies
Identify statistical portraits (profiles) of a
typical victim
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Use and Abuse of Statistics
Interpretation of Statistics
Can be used to influence decision makers
Can be used to reduce or increase fears
Can be used to support police
administration
Can be used to show something is not
working
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Caution
However, be aware that statistics can
be used to present one viewpoint, or
be presented with a ―spin.‖
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
8/18/2015
4
FBI gathers data from local police departments and publishes an annual report of crime statistics called the Uniform Crime Report (UCR).
Part One Crimes Reported—8 Crimes
Violent Crime Data—(4) Murder, Forcible Rape, Robbery and Aggravated Assault
Property Crime Data—(4) Burglary, Larceny/Theft, Motor Vehicle Theft and Arson
Uniform Crime Report (UCR)
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Uniform Crime Report (UCR)
UCR reflects data for cities, counties,
states, regions, and many college
campuses
Reports include:
Number of complaints filed with police
Total estimated losses
Proportion of cases solved
Characteristics of offenders arrested
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Uniform Crime Report (UCR)
Shortcomings of UCR Report Underreporting a major problem
Focus is offenders, not victims (homicide exception)
Mixes attempted crimes and completed crimes
Robbery includes all targets, does not single out households, banks, stores, etc.
Uses ‗hierarchy rule,‘ which reports only the most serious crime in a sequence of several criminal incidents
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
8/18/2015
5
National Incident-Based Reporting
System (NIBRS)
Tracks 46 Group A Offenses—Greater
Breakdown in data:
i.e. simple assault, vandalism, blackmail,
fraud, statutory rape, kidnapping
Gathers data relating to commission of
crime, victim information, value of theft,
race/ethnicity
Phasing in local law enforcement agencies
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
The NCVS
Another set of data is collected by the
Bureau of Justice Statistics and is based on
surveys with victims. It is called the National
Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) and it
often paints a different picture than the
UCR.
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
National Crime Victimization Survey
(NCVS)
Crime rates determined by public survey
of randomly selected households by U. S.
Census Bureau.
First survey, 1966—President‘s
Commission on Law Enforcement and the
Administration of Justice.
The NCVS reports crimes in the form of
rates per 1000.
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
8/18/2015
6
National Crime Victim Survey
(NCVS)
Crimes studied: Forcible rape & sexual assault
Robbery
Aggravated assault & simple assault
Theft
Household burglaries
Motor vehicle thefts
Only surveys those 12 years of age or older—Does NOT include crimes against those under 12 years of age.
Does not include murder
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Four Reasons NCVS Questioned
Bias of Information
Credibility of Information Wives reporting abuse, girls reporting date rape,
boys reporting robberies on bad drug deals
Memory Decay and Telescoping
Crimes against children under 12 not probed
Over reporting Pollsters, not detectives, to sort out conflicting
stories or facts
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
UCR vs. NCVS
During 70s and 80s, there appeared to
be low correlation between the two
official sources of data in regards to
victimization rates.
The two reporting systems again gave
conflicting signals at the end of 2001
regarding violent crimes and property
crimes. © 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
8/18/2015
7
UCR vs. NCVS
UCR—No data for victims except murder
NCVS—No data on crimes of murder,
bias/hate crimes, line of duty assaults on police.
No data on offenses against children under 12.
No data on business robberies or burglaries .
No data on arson or victims of arson.
UCR—computes rates/100,000 population.
NCVS—computes rates/1,000 age 12 and older
or/households (no number).
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Estimated Victimization Rates
Crime
rates
reported
by UCR
for
2013.
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Crime
rates
reported
by NCVS
for
2013.
Estimated Victimization Rates
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Table 3.1 Continued
8/18/2015
8
Uniform Crime Report (UCR)
One method of
illustrating the UCR
data is the ―Crime
Clock,‖ which shows
how many seconds
or minutes apart a
particular crime or
criminal event
occurs.
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Assessing Comparative Risks
Criminal
Event vs.
Accident/
Illness
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Assessing Comparative Risks
Conclusions:
1. Leading causes of death—heart disease, cancer, and stroke
2. More died from accidents than homicides
3. More people took their own life than lost life through lethal violence
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.