Advocacy Project
C hapter 6
G lobal H
ealth Financing
P ersonal and P
ublic H
ealth 6.1
Personal and Public H ealth
•H ealth expenditures are a significant
com ponent of the global econom
y, accounting for m
ore than 8% of the
w orld’s total gross dom
estic product (G
D P).
•Spending on health activities can be divided into tw
o categories: •M
oney spent on personal health •M
oney spent on public health
Figure 6-1
H igh-incom
e countries spend a high percentage of their gross dom
estic product (G
D P) on health.
Data from Global Burden of Disease Health Financing Collaborator Network. Evolution and patterns of global health financing 1995–2014: Development assistance for health, and government, prepaid private, and out-of-pocket health spending in 184 countries. Lancet 2017; 389:1981–2004.
Personal and Public H ealth
(cont’d) •
Personal health expenses relate to the health of one individual or fam
ily. •
E xam
ples: purchasing antibiotics, paying for a m
idw ife, buying test strips for self-m
onitoring of blood glucose levels
• Public health expenses relate to shared activities that protect a com
m unity, a nation, or the global
population at large. •
E xam
ples: investigating and containing outbreaks, m
arketing m ass polio vaccination days, using
insecticides in outdoor areas to kill m osquitoes,
developing evidence-based guidelines for screening for chronic diseases and m
anaging them
Personal and Public H ealth
(cont’d) •
W orldw
ide, m ore than $9 trillion w
as spent on health care in 2015. •
C osts could rise to $16 trillion per year by 2030.
• T
he am ount of m
oney spent on healthcare services for the average resident each year is m
uch higher in high-incom e
countries than it is in low -incom
e countries, even after adjusting for differences in the cost of living.
• T
here is a diversity of m echanism
s for paying for personal health expenses. •
M ost public health activities in higher-incom
e countries are funded by taxes; public health initiatives in low
er- incom
e countries are often financed w ith a com
bination of governm
ental and external support.
Figure 6-2
H ealth spending per capita (2014).
Data from Health system financing profile by country. Geneva: WHO Global Health Expenditure Database; 2017.
Figure 6-3
Total spending on health care per capita by country incom
e level (2014).
Data from Global Burden of Disease Health Financing Collaborator Network. Evolution and patterns of global health financing 1995– 2014: development assistance for health, and government, prepaid private, and out-of-pocket health spending in 184 countries. Lancet 2017; 389:1981–2004.
Figure 6-4
G overnm
ents in high-incom e countries use tax
revenue to pay for m ost health services; in
low -incom
e countries, a m ore diverse set of
funders pay for health activities.
Financing •
F inancing = the provision of m
oney for a particular activity and the m
anagem ent of that investm
ent. •
Financing for global health is allocated to both personal and public functions. •
Som e global health funding helps low
er-incom e
countries expand the personal healthcare services that they offer to residents. •
Som e global health funding supports global health
governance, the developm ent and dissem
ination of new
health technologies, pandem ic preparedness and
response, and other public health functions. •
T here are also expenses that blend the personal and
public health categories.
H ealth System
s 6.2
H ealth System
• A
health system includes all of the people, facilities,
products, resources, and organizational structures that deliver health services to a population. •
W H
O ’s 6 core building blocks:
1. T
he provision of effective personal and population- based healthcare services
2. A
w ell-trained and productive health w
orkforce that is able to provide quality care to all populations
3. A
strong health inform ation system
(H IS) that
collects, analyzes, and dissem inates the inform
ation about population health and health system
s perform
ance that is critical for health system decision-
m aking
H ealth System
(cont’d)
•W H
O ’s 6 core building blocks:
4. A
ccess to essential m edicines, m
edical devices, vaccines, and other health technologies
5. A
health financing system that enables
everyone to access affordable services w
hen they are needed (and at the sam e
tim e provides incentives not to overuse
services) 6.
E ffective oversight of the system
to ensure safety, efficiency, and accountability
SD G
s and U H
C •
T he Sustainable D
evelopm ent G
oals aim by 2030 to “achieve universal
health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential healthcare services, and access to safe, effective, quality, and affordable m
edicines and vaccines for all” (SD G
3.8). •
U niversal health coverage (U
H C
)is present w hen everyone in a
country has access to high-quality health services (including preventive care, diagnosis, treatm
ent, and rehabilitation) and everyone is protected from
m ajor health-associated financial shocks via a tax-based financing
system or a health insurance plan.
• In places w
here patients and their fam ilies pay out-of-pocket for m
ost health services, the poorest households are often excluded from
accessing quality care.
• C
ountries that spread the cost of health services across the w hole population
(through tax revenue or m andatory participation in highly regulated
insurance plans) enable everyone to access the services that are included in the national health plan.
Figure 6-5
U niversal health coverage spreads the cost
burden for health services across the w hole
population.
Data from World health report 1999. Geneva: WHO; 1999.
H ealth System
s Financing •
G overnm
ents aim ing to achieve U
H C
m ust m
ake difficult decisions about w
hich goods and services to cover under the national health plan. •
R esource lim
itations m ay m
ean that only part of a com
prehensive strategy for im proving health can be
publicly funded. •
H ealth system
strengthening requires a process of identifying priorities and resources, strategizing about the policies that w
ill achieve key goals, transform ing
those ideas into operational action plans, and then im
plem enting changes and tracking progress tow
ard m
eeting targets.
H ealth System
s Financing (cont’d)
• G
overnm ent officials m
ust also m ake critical
determ inations about how
m uch funding can be allocated
to the health system and how
m uch m
ust be dedicated to m
aintaining other necessary services. •
Increases in spending on health often require decreases in funding for education and other social services.
• T
he governm ents of high-incom
e countries w ith aging
populations usually allocate m ore of their budget to health
than to education. •
L M
IC s w
ith a large proportion of children in their populations usually allocate m
ore funding to education than to health.
• T
hese spending priorities are reflected in surveys that ask residents about their perceptions of social services and their overall quality of life.
Figure 6-6
Satisfaction w ith health care quality is highest
in high-incom e countries.
Data from World health statistics 2016. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
P aying for P
ersonal H
ealth 6.3
Paying for Personal H ealth
•E ach country has a unique m
ix of strategies for funding personal health, but there are som
e general patterns by country incom
e level.
Figure 6-7
Total spending on health by payer and country incom e level.
Data from Global Burden of Disease Health Financing Collaborator Network. Evolution and patterns of global health financing 1995–2014: development assistance for health, and government, prepaid private, and out-of-pocket health spending in 184 countries. Lancet 2017; 389:1981–2004.
Personal H ealth in H
igh-Incom e
C ountries
• M
ost high-incom e countries have a governm
ent- sponsored healthcare system
that is paid for through general tax revenue, m
andatory paym ents into a
governm ent-run social security system
, or other types of com
pulsory contributions. •
H ealth services are typically provided at
governm ent health facilities or at private facilities
that receive m ost of their funds from
the governm
ent. •
T he health financing and delivery system
in the U
nited States is a notable exception to the general global trend.
Personal H ealth in M
iddle- Incom
e C ountries
•In m ost m
iddle-incom e countries,
governm ents pay for a portion of health
costs but the rem aining m
oney spent on health is expended in the form
of out-of- pocket (O
O P
) paym ents, cash
disbursem ents m
ade by patients and their fam
ilies in order to receive health services. •T
he range of services covered by governm
ental healthcare plans varies w
idely.
Figure 6-8
Sources of funding for health in featured countries. (Prepaid private spending includes private insurance and spending by
nongovernm ental organizations.)
Data from Global Burden of Disease Health Financing Collaborator Network. Evolution and patterns of global health financing 1995–2014: development assistance for health, and government, prepaid private, and out-of-pocket health spending in 184 countries. Lancet 2017; 389:1981–2004.
Personal H ealth in L
ow -Incom
e C
ountries •
In low -incom
e countries, m ost healthcare services are paid for
out-of-pocket on a pay-as-you-go basis. •
A m
ix of public, not-for-profit private, and for-profit form al and
inform al healthcare providers are available in urban areas, but
there m ay be very few
services in rural areas. •
Som e basic clinical services that have been deem
ed necessary for achieving high-priority global health goals are paid for by dom
estic governm
ents and international donors to ensure that these services are available to everyone w
ho needs them .
• For other health conditions, both public (governm
ental) and private healthcare facilities m
ay charge user fees and require additional paym
ent for m edicines and supplies.
• Increasing access to affordable health services for the m
ost vulnerable populations is one of the m
ajor goals for health system
strengthening in m ost low
-incom e countries.
H ealth Insurance
6.4
H ealth Insurance
•Insurance is a risk m anagem
ent strategy that protects purchasers against m
ajor financial losses. •H
ealth insurance is intended to protect insured people from
incurring overw
helm ing expenses if they
happen to develop an expensive health condition.
H ealth Insurance (cont’d)
• H
ealth insurance system s, w
hether private or public, are funded based on the principle of pooled risk. •
P ooled risk
assum es that if m
any low -risk people and
a few high-risk people all pay prem
ium s to the
insurance system over m
any years, then there w ill be a
pot of m oney that can be used to pay for m
ajor illnesses and injuries w
hen they occur. •
O nly a few
people w ill develop a very serious chronic
condition or suffer a catastrophic injury, but because everyone is at risk of unexpected health crises, m
ost people are w
illing to pay for protection against a lifetim
e of unm anageable, im
poverishing debt as a result of one m
edical incident.
H ealth Insurance in the U
SA •
T he country that spends the m
ost on health each year, by far, is the U
nited States. •
T he U
SA has a health system
that is unique am ong
high-incom e countries because it is not a universal
health coverage system .
• In 2015, about 91%
of A m
ericans had health insurance coverage and 9%
had no health insurance. •
O f the insured individuals, about tw
o-thirds had private health insurance and about one-third w
ere on a governm
ent plan. •
N early all health services w
ere provided at private facilities.
Figure 6-9
Total spending on health care per capita in featured countries (2014).
Data from Global Burden of Disease Health Financing Collaborator Network. Evolution and patterns of global health financing 1995–2014: development assistance for health, and government, prepaid private, and out-of-pocket health spending in 184 countries. Lancet 2017; 389:1981–2004.
H ealth Insurance in the U
SA
(cont’d) •
M ost w
orking-aged A m
ericans and their children have em
ploym ent-based private health insurance.
• P
rem ium
: a m onthly fee paid for health insurance
• D
eductible: the am ount that an insured person m
ust spend out-of-pocket on health care each year (in addition to prem
ium s) before the insurance com
pany begins paying for health services •
C opay: a fixed fee that is paid out-of-pocket by an
insured patient w hen receiving routine health services
• C
o-insurance: a percentage of the costs of care that is paid out-of-pocket by an insured patient
H ealth Insurance in the U
SA
(cont’d) •T
he m ajor governm
ental insurance plans provide healthcare coverage for older adults, low
-incom e households, and
m ilitary personnel. •M
edicare is the federal health funding system
for people w ho are ages 65 and
older and people w ith serious perm
anent disabilities. •M
edicaid is a federal program
that provides funding to states to support state-sponsored health coverage for very low
-incom e
citizens.
H ealth Insurance in the U
SA
(cont’d) •
W hile health insurance in the U
nited States w as
originally designed to cover only the catastrophic expenses from
serious illnesses or injuries that few
individuals could afford to pay, m any insurance
plans now pay for preventive care and m
inor health problem
s because the insurance com panies have
determ ined that they save m
oney w hen m
inor conditions are treated before they becom
e m ajor
problem s.
• T
he com pany m
ay provide incentives for people w ith
these chronic diseases to participate in disease m
anagem ent program
s that catch em erging problem
s early and avert the need for expensive em
ergency care.
H ealth Insurance in O
ther C
ountries •
Som e other high-incom
e countries use health insurance as part of their strategy for ensuring universal health care coverage. •
For exam ple, in G
erm any every resident m
ust belong to a highly regulated “sickness fund.” •
E m
ployers pay half of the costs for em ployees, and the
governm ent covers the full expense for children and
for unem ployed adults.
• Inpatient care is provided at both public and private hospitals, and m
ost outpatient care is provided at private clinics. •
T he paym
ents that providers receive for their services are identical no m
atter w here they w
ork.
H ealth Insurance in O
ther C
ountries (cont’d) •
H ealth insurance is also being used by a grow
ing num ber
of residents of m iddle-incom
e countries (L M
IC s) so that
they can access advanced care from high-quality private
health providers. •
For exam ple, a large proportion of higher-incom
e B
razilians purchase private insurance plans and seek m
edical and surgical care at private facilities. •
E veryone in B
razil can access free prim ary and em
ergency health care at public facilities—
an im portant right
guaranteed under B razil’s constitution—
but the public health system
offers a lim ited range of services and
technologies. •
H ealth insurance allow
s w ealthier households to access a
greater range of health services, procedures, m edications,
and equipm ent from
their preferred providers.
P aying for G
lobal H
ealth Interventions 6.5
Paying for G lobal H
ealth Interventions
• T
he m oney spent on global public health initiatives com
es from a
different set of sources than the m oney that pays for individual
health care. •
L ocal and national governm
ental spending provides the m ajority of
funding for public health interventions around the w orld.
• G
lobal public health is funded by a com bination of grants from
one country to another, grants and loans from
intergovernm ental
agencies, and gifts from private-sector foundations, businesses, and
individuals. •
T he best financing m
echanism s for new
global health initiatives are sources that are stable and sustainable over tim
e, that are new
funding lines rather than m oney redirected from
another program ,
and that are m anaged efficiently w
ithout dem anding heavy
adm inistrative costs or burdening recipient populations.
Figure 6-10
Typical pathw ay from
global health funders to im
plem enters.
D onor M
otivations •
D onor m
otivations •
For the governm ents of high-incom
e countries, health funding for low
er-incom e countries is part of foreign
policy strategies for building trade alliances and protecting hom
eland security. •
M ultilateral lending groups m
ay consider global health projects to be good financial investm
ents. •
Philanthropic organizations m ay view
global health as a tool for reducing poverty and prom
oting hum an
flourishing. •
L arge corporations m
ay use global health w ork to
cultivate custom er loyalty in new
m arkets, take
advantage of tax incentives, and foster a shared sense of purpose am
ong em ployees.
D onor M
otivations (cont’d)
•M ost of these rationales for funding
global health yield benefits for both the recipients and the donors. •T
he best global health projects achieve goals that are m
utually beneficial to all involved parties.
O fficial D
evelopm ent
A ssistance
6.6
O fficial D
evelopm ent A
ssistance (O
D A
) •
O fficial developm
ent assistance (O D
A ) = m
oney given by the governm
ent of a high-incom e country
to the governm ent of a low
-incom e country to
support socioeconom ic developm
ent. •
A lthough som
e aid is given sim ply to fight poverty,
aid is often tied to the political and econom ic interests
of the donor country. •
M ost O
D A
is donated to low -and m
iddle-incom e
countries (L M
IC s) by high-incom
e countries that are m
em bers of the D
evelopm ent A
ssistance C
om m
ittee (D A
C ) of the O
rganisation for E
conom ic C
o-operation and D evelopm
ent (O E
C D
).
O fficial D
evelopm ent A
ssistance (O
D A
) (cont’d) •T
he Sustainable D evelopm
ent G oals call for
“developed countries to im plem
ent fully their official developm
ent assistance com m
itm ents,
including the com m
itm ent by m
any developed countries to achieve the target of 0.7%
of gross national incom
e (G N
I) for O D
A to developing
countries and 0.15% to 0.20%
of G N
I to least developed countries” (SD
G 17.2).
•In 2015, the five donor nations that provided the greatest am
ount of O D
A in total dollars
w ere the U
nited States, the U nited K
ingdom ,
G erm
any, Japan, and France.
O fficial D
evelopm ent A
ssistance (O
D A
) (cont’d) •A
s a percentage of their gross national incom
e (G N
I), the largest donors w ere
Sw eden, N
orw ay, L
uxem bourg,
D enm
ark, the N etherlands, and the
U nited K
ingdom , w
hich all spent at least0.7%
of their G N
I on O D
A .
•T he U
nited States spent 0.17% of its G
N I
on O D
A , a rate far below
the 0.7% target
in the SD G
s even though the U nited
States had the w orld’s largest O
D A
budget.
O D
A from
the U SA
• T
he foreign aid spending by the U nited States in 2015
provides an illustration of an annual foreign aid budget. •
In 2015, the U nited States spent about $32 billion on
hum anitarian and other foreign aid, w
hich w as about 0.9%
of total national governm
ent spending. •
W hen the $17 billion spent on foreign m
ilitary and security assistance (w
hich is only a sm all portion of the m
ilitary budget used for international hum
anitarian operations and other joint responses w
ith allies) is com bined w
ith non- m
ilitary/security foreign aid, the total spending on foreign assistance w
as about 1.3% of national governm
ental spending.
• A
id m ay be given in the form
of cash transfers, equipm ent
and com m
odities (such as food and com puters), training
and expert advice, or infrastructure developm ent.
O D
A from
the U SA
(cont’d) •
M ost non-m
ilitary/security O D
A flow
s through the U .S.
A gency for International D
evelopm ent (U
SA ID
). •
M ost m
ilitary aid flow s through the D
epartm ent of D
efense (D
O D
). •
T he U
.S. governm ent considers foreign aid to be a critical
contributor to national security because aid supports econom
ic grow th, prom
otes stability, and com bats illegal
activities. •
T he top recipients of non-m
ilitary/security O D
A from
the U
nited States in 2015 w ere A
fghanistan, Jordan, Pakistan, K
enya, E thiopia, South Sudan, Syria, and the D
R C
. •
A ll of these countries w
ere engaged in civil conflicts or located adjacent to conflict areas and housing large refugee populations.
Figure 6-11
Foreign aid expenditures by the U nited States
in 2015 by spending category, w ith and
w ithout m
ilitary/security assistance.
Data from Tarnoff C, Lawson ML. Foreign aid: An introduction to U.S. programs and policy. Washington: Congressional Research Service (CRS); 2016.
D evelopm
ent A ssistance for
H ealth (D
A H
) •G
lobal health has becom e a prom
inent O
D A
priority. •D
evelopm ent assistance for health
(D A
H )= donor aid for health = O
D A
designated for health activities. •D
A H
is an im portant com
ponent of the health budget in low
-incom e countries .
•G lobally, m
ore than $20 billion of O
D A
w as spent on global health in
2015.
D evelopm
ent A ssistance for
H ealth (D
A H
) (cont’d) •T
he U nited States allocated nearly $10 billion
of its foreign aid budget to global health activities in 2015, m
aking it the largest contributor of D
A H
both in term s of the total
budget for D A
H and the percentage of its
foreign aid budget assigned to D A
H .
• A
bout 70% of those funds w
ere dedicated to H
IV /A
ID S, tuberculosis, and m
alaria program s.
• O
ther supported activities w ere in the areas of
neglected tropical diseases, reproductive health, child health, nutrition, w
ater and sanitation, and global health security.
Figure 6-12
D evelopm
ent assistance for health (D A
H ) is an
im portant com
ponent of total spending on health in low
-incom e countries.
Data from Global Burden of Disease Health Financing Collaborator Network. Evolution and patterns of global health financing 1995–2014: Development assistance for health, and government, prepaid private, and out-of-pocket health spending in 184 countries. Lancet 2017; 389:1981– 2004.
Figure 6-13
The U nited States is a large donor of
developm ent assistance for health (D
A H
).
Data from Financing global health 2015: Development assistance steady on the path to new Global Goals. Seattle: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME); 2016.
FD I and R
em ittances
• T
he SD G
s em phasize that O
D A
is only part of the plan for funding developm
ent activities. •
T he SD
G s call for action to “strengthen dom
estic resource m
obilization, including through international support to developing countries, to im
prove dom estic capacity for
tax and other revenue collection (SD G
17.1) and to “m
obilize additional financial resources for developing countries from
m ultiple sources,” including foreign direct
investm ents and rem
ittances (SD G
17.3). •
F oreign direct investm
ent (F D
I)= business investm ents
m ade by corporations and individuals in other countries.
• R
em ittances
= funds transferred by international w orkers
back to fam ily m
em bers in their hom
e com m
unities.
FD I and R
em ittances (cont’d)
•T he total am
ount of O D
A globally
in 2015 neared $150 billion (about 0.3%
of G N
I in D A
C countries);
about $765 billion in FD I w
as invested in L
M IC
s, and about $430 billion in rem
ittances w ere sent to
L M
IC s.
M ultilateral A
id 6.7
M ultilateral A
id
•T here are tw
o m ain types of O
D A
, bilateral aid and m
ultilateral aid. •B
ilateral aid = m oney given directly from
one country (usually a high-incom
e country) to another country (usually a low
er-incom e
country). •M
ultilateral aid = funding pooled from m
any donor countries. •
T he largest m
ultilateral organizations include the U
nited N ations, the W
orld B ank and other
developm ent banks, and the E
uropean U nion.
M ultilateral A
id (cont’d) •
M ultilateral organizations receive tw
o types of funds from
m em
ber nations: •
A ssessed contributions are m
andatory dues calculated from
each country’s econom ic and population statistics.
• V
oluntary contributions are extra funds a country opts to donate.
• M
andatory funds go to the general budget of the m
ultilateral organizations. •
V oluntary contributions can be designated as core
(unrestricted) or non-core (restricted) funding. •
C ore funding can be used by the m
ultilateral organization on any projects they deem
to be priorities. •
N on-core funding is given for a specific purpose by the
donor and m ust be spent on that particular activity.
M ultilateral A
id (cont’d)
•In 2013, about 59% of O
D A
w as
bilateral O D
A distributed by bilateral
agencies, about 28% w
as core m
ultilateral O D
A from
assessed and voluntary contributions, and about 13%
w
as earm arked non-core bilateral aid
distributed through m ultilateral
organizations to designated recipient countries.
T he W
orld B ank and IM
F •
Tw o m
ultilateral institutions have played a unique role in financing econom
ic developm ent projects because they
offer both loans (borrow
ed m oney that m
ust be repaid w
ith interest) and grants (m
oney that does not have to be repaid): the W
orld B ank and International M
onetary Fund. •
B oth institutions w
ere founded in 1944 during a sum m
it held at B
retton W oods, N
ew H
am pshire.
• B
oth are headquartered in W ashington, D
C .
• B
oth are ow ned by their nearly 180 m
em ber nations.
• B
oth m ay require recipient countries to im
plem ent
econom ic policy reform
s as a condition of receiving loans. •
B ut the tw
o institutions have distinct functions and m odes
of operating.
T he W
orld B ank
•T he W
orld B ank
is an investm ent bank
that m akes loans to developing countries.
•B ecause W
orld B ank loans m
ust be repaid w
ith interest, lending nations can m ake a
profit by lending m oney to poorer countries,
assum ing that the principal is repaid w
ith interest. •D
ebt repaym ents to international financial
institutions are also used to m ake new
loans for developm
ent projects in other countries, including projects focused on health.
T he W
orld B ank (cont’d)
• T
he W orld B
ank’s prim ary lending institute is the
International B ank for R
econstruction and D evelopm
ent (IB
R D
), w hich issues bonds in order to be able to m
ake loans to m
iddle-incom e m
em ber countries.
• T
hese loans carry an interest rate that is slightly above the m
arket rate, and they are usually supposed to be repaid w
ithin 15 years. •
T he m
ajority of loans are for specific infrastructure projects.
• T
he International D evelopm
ent A ssociation (ID
A ) m
akes interest-free loans to low
-incom e m
em ber nations using
m oney that has been donated from
high-incom e countries.
• ID
A loans are usually supposed to be paid back over a 40-
year period.
T he IM
F •
T he International M
onetary F und (IM
F )
provides a structure for international m
onetary policy and currency exchanges, and it also m
akes loans to countries of any incom
e level that have a balance of paym ent need and
w ould otherw
ise not be able to m ake paym
ents on their other international loans. •
T he goal of IM
F loans is to allow countries to rebuild
their m onetary reserves, stabilize their currencies,
continue paying for im ports, and create conditions for
econom ic grow
th and high em ploym
ent rates. •
T he interest rates for IM
F funds are usually slightly below
m arket rates, and m
oney received from the IM
F is usually supposed to be paid back w
ithin a few years.
T he W
orld B ank and IM
F •
A m
ajor criticism of the international loan system
is that paym
ents on debt divert m oney aw
ay from
education, health, clean w ater, and other essential
hum an services in low
-incom e countries.
• T
he SD G
s acknow ledge the significant problem
s associated w
ith overw helm
ing debt in low -incom
e countries, and they aim
to “assist developing countries in attaining long-term
debt sustainability through coordinated policies aim
ed at fostering debt financing, debt relief, and debt restructuring, as appropriate, and address the external debt of highly indebted poor countries to reduce debt distress” (SD
G 17.4).
T he W
orld B ank and IM
F (cont’d)
•C oncerns about debt burden are one of
the reasons that developm ent banks are
now playing less of a role in global
health funding than they did in the past: in 2000 m
ore than 20% of developm
ent assistance for health (D
A H
) cam e from
developm
ent banks, but in 2015 less than 10%
of D A
H w
as disbursed through developm
ent banks.
F oundations and
C orporate D
onations 6.8
Foundations
•F oundation
= a charitable trust that gives grants to other nonprofit organizations. •A
private foundation is one that is established and funded by an individual, fam
ily, or corporation as a m echanism
for m
aking tax-deductible donations to entities that align w
ith values of the funders. •T
he w ord foundation is also often used to
describe public charities that solicit financial support from
other individuals, foundations, and governm
ent agencies in order to engage in nonprofit activities.
Foundations (cont’d) •
E ndow
m entis a large donation m
ade to a nonprofit organization so that the funds can be invested and the interest from
the investm ents can be used to support the
operation of the charity. •
E xam
ples of foundations w ith large endow
m ents:
• T
he B ill and M
elinda G ates F
oundation, w hich is the
largest private foundation in the w orld (w
ith $40.4 billion in assets at the end of 2015); the G
ates Foundation gave aw
ay nearly $4 billion in 2015, w ith about $2.9 billion of
that total allocated to developm ent assistance for health
(D A
H ).
• T
he Ford Foundation ($12.2 billion in assets) donated $512 m
illion in 2015. •
T he R
obert W ood Johnson Foundation ($10.3 billion)
donated $348 m illion in 2015.
C orporate D
onations
•A corporate social responsibility (C
SR )
plan spells out the positive social and environm
ental actions a com pany
voluntarily supports. •In-kind donations of goods or services
related to the corporation’s core business are often part of C
SR program
s. •Pharm
aceutical corporations are som e of the
biggest donors to global health initiatives.
C orporate D
onations (cont’d) •
W hy donate? •
A n expression of hum
anitarian values •
A tax deduction
• H
elp develop international m arkets
• Increase brand recognition am
ong potential custom ers
• Populations w
ith increased incom es and decreased
health expenditures as a result of successful charitable health initiatives have m
ore m oney to
spend on other goods and services. •
B y investing in helping potential and current
consum ers becom
e healthy and m aintain their health,
com panies are doing good w
hile expanding their m
arkets and gaining brand loyalty.
P ersonal D
onations 6.9
Personal D onations
• M
any people all over the w orld have been and continue to be
generous in their support of nonprofit entities. •
For exam ple, people in the U
nited States donated nearly $375 billion to charity in 2015, w
ith 71% of this total given by
individuals, 16% by foundations, 9%
from bequests (donations
released to a charity from the estate of a deceased person w
ho nam
ed the charity is her/her w ill), and 5%
by corporations. •
In total, those donations represent about 2.1% of the country’s total
gross dom estic product (G
D P).
• Individual donations account for 2%
of all disposable incom e in the
U nited States.
• T
he m ajor recipients of funding w
ere religious groups (32% of
donations), educational institutions (15% ), hum
an services organizations (12%
), and health charities (8% ).
• M
any of the organizations w ithin all of these categories provide
services that support health and the tools for health.
Personal D onations (cont’d)
• T
he generosity of individual donors is especially visible after m
ajor natural disasters like earthquakes and tsunam
is, w hen charities m
ay receive m illions of dollars
of donations in the days im m
ediately after the event. •
T he A
m erican R
ed C ross received $581 m
illion in designated donations after the devastating Indian O
cean tsunam
i in 2004, $488 m illion in designated donations after
the m assive earthquake in H
aiti in 2010, and $2.1 billion after H
urricane K atrina hit the G
ulf C oast of the U
nited States in 2005.
• A
nother popular giving option for individuals is child sponsorship, a charitable donation m
odel in w hich a
donor selects a child to sponsor and then receives regular updates about that particular child in exchange for continued m
onthly contributions to the host organization.
Personal D onations (cont’d)
• M
ore than 20 nonprofit organizations in the U nited States that
w ork in the international arena generated revenue exceeding $250
m illion in fiscal year 2015 (including funds from
both charitable donations and governm
ental contracts for im plem
enting international developm
ent projects). •
T he best-rated charities spend a relatively sm
all proportion of their budget on adm
inistration and fundraising and apply m ost incom
e to direct program
expenses. •
T he annual reports of registered charities allow
potential donors to evaluate the financial perform
ance of organizations before m aking a
contribution. •
T he organizations’ w
ebsites and other online tools allow potential
donors to assess the im portance and effectiveness of the
organizations’ w ork.
Figure 6-14
M ajor nonprofit organizations based in the
U nited States and w
orking internationally.
Data from Charity Navigator. Glen Rock NJ: Charity Navigator; 2017.
Figure 6-15
M ajor m
ultipurpose hum an services and disease-
specific charities based in the U nited States.
Data from Charity Navigator. Glen Rock NJ: Charity Navigator; 2017.