2-3pages essay book review

profileMary1234
9.UrbanRebellions-PunkandRiotsWinter2020.pptx.zip

9. Urban Rebellions - Punk and Riots Winter 2020.pptx

Migrant City

4. Hostility

2

From Local to National: Anti-Immigrant Hostility

Fast Demographic Change

Conservative Community and Republican Primaries

Local and State Political Entrepreneurs

National Organizations and Intellectuals

National Politicians

National Media

4. Hostility in Receiving Cities

3

4. Hostility in Receiving Cities

1. Fast Demographic Change

Gateway Cities

New Destinations

4

4. Hostility in Receiving Cities

2. Conservative Community and Republican Primaries

5

4. Hostility in Receiving Cities

3. Local Political Entrepreneurs – Transform Troubles into Existential Threat

6

4. Hostility in Receiving Cities

4. National Organizations and Intellectuals

7

National Organizations and Intellectuals

“In this new era, the single most immediate and most serious challenge to America's traditional identity comes from the immense and continuing immigration from Latin America, especially from Mexico ….[T]hey [Americans] have overlooked the unique characteristics and problems posed by contemporary Hispanic immigration. The extent and nature of this immigration differ fundamentally from those of previous immigration, and the assimilation successes of the past are unlikely to be duplicated with the contemporary flood of immigrants from Latin America. This reality poses a fundamental question: Will the United States remain a country with a single national language and a core Anglo-Protestant culture? By ignoring this question, Americans acquiesce to their eventual transformation into two peoples with two cultures (Anglo and Hispanic) and two languages (English and Spanish).”

Samuel Huntington, Professor of Government, Harvard University, Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

4. Hostility in Receiving Cities

8

5. National Politicians

4. Hostility in Receiving Cities

9

5. National Politicians

4. Hostility in Receiving Cities

“After the Crime Bill passed in 1994, we build a stronger record on crime. The illegal immigration legislation provides that same opportunity; now that the legislation is passed, we can build up a strong administration record on immigration. If we want continued public support for trade and friendly relations with Mexico, we must be vigilant in our effort to curb illegal trade (e.g. narcotic and immigrants).”

Emanuel, Rahm. 1996. “Memorandum to President Clinton: Domestic Policy.” November 12.

10

6. National Media

4. Hostility in Receiving Cities

Massey, D. and K. Pren (2012) “Unintended Consequences of US Immigration Policy: Explaining the Post-1965 Surge from Latin America,” Population and Development Review, p. 7

11

From Local to National: The Process of Nativism

Fast Demographic Change

Conservative Community and Republican Primaries

Local and State Political Entrepreneurs

National Organizations and Intellectuals

National Politicians

National Media

4. Hostility in Receiving Cities

12

5. From Words to Laws: Centralizing and Localizing Immigration Policy

13

Centralizing Government Policy

14

History: Braceros (end in 1964)

Government Migration Restrictions:

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965

Immigration Reform and Control Act, 1986

1990 Immigration Act

Operation Blockade, Operation Gatekeeper, 1993

Illegal Immigration Reform and Responsibility Act, 1996

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDP), 1996

Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) , 1996

5. From Words to Laws: Centralizing Power

15

9/11 Terrorism and Tightening the Screws

“The nation's defense against terrorism has been seriously eroded by the efforts of open-border advocates, and the innocent victims of today's terrorist attacks have paid the price” (Dan Stein, Federation of American Immigration Reform, NY Times, September 24, 2001)

“I note worries that terrorists would use the Mexico border as a back door to the United States, and there is the need to stop illegal crossings” (Condoleezza Rice, NY Times, March 11, 2005).

Grover Norquist (Americans for Tax Reform, “Immigration reform and border security are not competitors; they are the same thing” (Grover Norquist, NY Times, April 13, 2005).

5. From Words to Laws: Centralizing Power

16

2001 USA Patriot Act Created Department of Homeland Security: increased funding for surveillance and deportation of foreigners, and authorized deportation of noncitizens without due process

2004 National Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Protection Act: Funded new equipment, aircraft, Border Patrol agents, immigration investigators, and detention centers for border enforcement

2005 Real ID Act: Sharply increased the data requirements, documentation, and verification procedures for state issuance of drivers licenses

2006 Secure Fence Act: Authorized construction of additional fencing, vehicle barriers, checkpoints, lighting and funding for new cameras, satellites, and unmanned drones for border enforcement

2010 Border Security Act: Funded hiring 3,000 more Border Patrol agents and increased BP budget by $244 million

5. From Words to Laws: Centralizing Power

17

Spending Increases

Meissner, D., Kerwin, D.M., Chishti, M., and C. Bergeron, 2013: 12

5. From Words to Laws: Centralizing Power

18

Localizing Government Policy

19

Federal Partnerships

287 (g)

Secure Communities

Restrictive Local / State Laws

5. From Words to Laws: Localizing Policy

20

287g Partnerships: By Region

5. From Words to Laws: Localizing Policy

21

Northeast 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2014 2016 0 0 0 0 0 0.11764705882352899 7.4626865671641798E-2 7.1428571428571397E-2 7.0422535211267595E-2 5.8823529411764698E-2 7.69230769230769E-2 8.5714285714285701E-2 9.375E-2 Midwest 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2014 2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.47761194029851E-2 4.2857142857142899E-2 4.2253521126760597E-2 4.4117647058823602E-2 2.5641025641025699E-2 2.8571428571428598E-2 3.125E-2 South 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2014 2016 1 1 1 0.4 0.375 0.58823529411764697 0.62686567164179097 0.61428571428571399 0.61971830985915499 0.63235294117647101 0.58974358974358998 0.628571428571429 0.6875 West 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2014 2016 0 0 0 0.6 0.625 0.29411764705882398 0.25373134328358199 0.27142857142857202 0.26760563380281699 0.26470588235294101 0.30769230769230799 0.25714285714285701 0.1875

Source: http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/349/

Secure Communities

5. From Words to Laws: Localizing Policy

22

 

Local Anti-Immigrant Measures “Spreading like Wildfire”

The Role of the Federation of American Immigration Reform and Kris Kobach

Source: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/03/anti-immigration-law-database

5. From Words to Laws: Localizing Policy

23

5. From Words to Laws: Localizing Policy

Centralizing and Localizing Immigration Policy =

Deportations

25

“None of the terrorist attacks involved Mexicans, and none of the terrorists entered through Mexico. Indeed, all came to the United States on legal visas…Mexicans nonetheless bore the brunt of the deportation campaign launched in the name of the war on terrorism, comprising 72% of those removed in 2009” (Massey and Pren 2012: 16, emphasis added).

Massey, D. and K. Pren (2012) “Unintended Consequences of US Immigration Policy: Explaining the Post-1965 Surge from Latin America,” Population and Development Review, p. 7

5. From Words to Laws: Localizing Policy

5. From Words to Laws: Localizing Policy

Local and County Policies: Sanctuary

Los Angeles: Special Order 40 (1979) – Forbids Police to Inquire about Immigration Status

Maricopa County Arizona: Strong Cooperation in 287(g) and Secure Communities

5. From Words to Laws: Localizing Policy

State Sanctuary Policies

California: Trust Act AB4 (2013); Values Act, SB54 (2017)

Arizona: Anti-Immigrant Laws: “Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act” SB1070 (2010)

Unintended Consequences of Restrictions

More Undocumented Migrants

31

Unintended Consequences:

Hostile Words

More Borders

Reduces Circular Temporary Migration

Increases Settlement of Unauthorized Migrants

Increases Family Migration

Increases Mixed Family Status

5. From Words to Laws: More Laws, More Undocumented Immigration

32

1. Global Migration 2. The Geography of Immigrant Communities 3. Immigrant Communities 4. Hostility in Receiving Cities 5. From Words to Laws

33

Urban Rebellions

Part 1: Subversive Culture

Part 2: Urban Rage

Subversive Culture

Part I. Punks in the City

37

 

Disgruntled Youth in the City

Economic Recession

Cultural Dismay

Political Disillusionment

38

 

Subversive Youths Across Cities

New York and London: Centers of Punk

Connecting to Los Angeles

Increasing Numbers in L.A.

39

 

Subversive Youths Across Cities

Sid Vicious and Johnny Ramone

40

 

Consolidating a Core Group of Subversives

Growing Numbers

Institutionalization – Do It Yourself (DIY)

Connecting Places (venues, Canterbury apts)

Literature (fanzines, Slash)

Distribution (Bomp records)

The Masque

41

 

Consolidating a Core Group of Subversives

Social Networks:

Appropriating Abandoned Urban Spaces

Proximity

Multiplex Networking

42

 

Fast Growth and Group Complexity

Group Complexity:

Early Group: Strong Solidarity – Amorphous

More People – More Distinctions: True Punks vs. Poseurs

RODNEY ON KROQ

Fast Growth:

More Bands (X, Go Go’s, …)

More Media (Rodney on the Rock)

More Venues (Elk Lodge, Al’s Bar, Hollywood Clubs)

43

Hollywood: The Core Geographical Cluster

44

Part II. The Revenge of the

Suburbs: Punk Goes to the Burbs

45

Spreading: From City Core to Suburban Periphery

Black Flag

Suicidal Tendencies

Minutemen

TSOL

Social Distortion

Red Kross

Circle Jerks

Descendents

Adolescents

Vandals

Agent Orange

Flipside Fanzine

KSPC

KXLU

46

Think Pair Share

Develop a step by step theory for the suburbanization of punk.

Identify the specific steps in the process.

 

Punk and Post Metropolitan Landscapes

Diffusing out from the Center

Suburban Spinoffs

Blocked from the Center

48

 

Subversive Nodes Connecting across the Region

New Institutions

Connections across Suburbs

KSPC

49

 

Taking Aim: Family Man and Consumer Culture

Classical Punk Message

Taking Aim at the Backbone of Suburban Life

50

 

Punk Challenging Middle Class, Suburban Culture

51

Part III. Punk in the Barrio

52

 

Placing Barrio Punk in Context

The Roaring 1980s: Growing Opportunities for Some, But Not for Others

Police Repression

Barrio Punk: Critique of Economic and Racialized System

53

 

New Group Formation – New Cultural Project

Emergence: Friends at School

Innovations: Mixing Different Styles – Creating New Culture

54

 

Rejected by All Sides

Rejected by Minority Community

Rejected by Some in White Punk Community

55

 

Sharpening Boundaries

Safe Space Enables Cultural Support and Identity

Constructing Identity

Constructing Message

Constructing Bonds

Sharpening Cultural Boundaries

Strong Group Identifiers

Distinction Between Insider and Outsider

Attributing Value: Authentic versus Poser

56

 

Connecting to Other Struggles

Connecting to Social Justice Movements in Los Angeles

Connecting to Political Struggles in Latin America

57

 

Space of Empowerment

Institutionalizing Subversive Culture

Strengthening Commitment to Transgressive and Subversive Cultural Politics

58

Part IV. Punk Now?

59

 

Spatial Diffusion and Mainstreaming: Punk is Dead

Major Diffusion

Larger Audience

Great Commercial Value

More Difficult to Maintain Subversion

But…Still Inspiring Aggrieved Youths

Backyard Punk: Boyle Heights

60

 

Extra Credit – 5 points

What are the economic and social conditions that shaped the lives of these youths?

How do these youths form groups with one another?

How do they form a common culture?

How do they exchange information?

61

Part 2

62

Conditions of Urban Rage: United States and France

63

1. Systemic Territorial Inequalities

 

2. Systemic Stigma

 

3. Systemic Police Repression

 

4. Contradictory Ideologies: equality and repression

 

5. Weak Advocacy Organizations

 

6. Killings and Police Brutality as Triggers

1. Systemic Territorial Inequalities

65

Territorial Marginalization

Commonalities with France:

Economic Decline following 1980s

Homogenous Class Structure

Predominance of Minorities

Racism

Differences with the United States:

Suburban Poverty:

Ethnic Heterogeneity:

Strong Presence of Government: School, Transit, Social Programs Keep Connections Alive

Territorial Inequalities

http://www.metropolitiques.eu/Are-socio-spatial-inequalities.html

https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2012/0501/In-France-s-suburban-ghettos-a-struggle-to-be-heard-amid-election-noise

66

2. Systemic Stigma

67

Territorial Stigmatization

Stigmatizing People in Places

I don’t know how you would characterize the gang leaders who got 13-year-old kids hopped up on crack and sent them out into the street to murder other African American children — maybe you thought they were good citizens. President Bill Clinton 1996

68

Territorial Stigmatization

Stigmatizing People in Places

President Sarkozy

President Chirac

69

3. Systemic Police Repression

70

Systematic Police Repression

71

Crime down, Imprisonment soaring

Systematic Police Repression

72

Expanding the Punitive Net

Systematic Police Repression

73

Systematic Police Repression

Non-Violent, Drug Offenses

74

Heavily Biased against Black population

Systematic Police Repression

75

Systematic Police Repression

Police shootings racially biased

76

Profiting from the Poor: Ferguson

Offset loss in tax shortfall through increasing funds

Number of citations became indicators of activity

City’s second largest source of revenue

Ferguson: Municipal court gross revenue for calendar year 2012 passed the $2 million mark 

21,000 warrants warrants for 33,000 offenses in 2013 alone.

Department of Justice Report: ‘Ferguson law enforcement practices are shaped by the city focus on revenue rather than by public safety needs.”  

Systematic Police Repression

77

Repression increasing in France, but the United States is still in front

78

Police Abuse in France

High Racial Profiling

High Rates of Police Brutality

Higher Incarceration

Systematic Police Repression

http://www.prisonstudies.org/highest-to-lowest/prison_population_rate?field_region_taxonomy_tid=All

79

Point: Systematic police repression increasing in France, but the United States is still far more repressive

80

4. Contradictory Ideologies: Equality and Discrimination

81

Ideal of Equality

United States: Liberty and Justice for All

France: Republicanism

Discriminatory Norms and Practices

United States: White Supremacy and Police Repression

France: Colonialism and Police Repression

Contradictory Ideologies

82

5. Weak Advocacy Organizations

83

Role of Advocacy Organizations in Poor Neighborhoods

Transforming Activists into Service Providers

United States: Professionalization (Community Development Corporations)

France: Service Associations

From Protest Function to Pacification Function

Weak Advocacy Organizations

84

6. Triggers

85

Unjust Act: Representative of Other Unjust Acts (not isolated events)

Outcomes:

France: Death of Three Teenagers in Clichy-sous-Bois

United States: Michael Brown in Ferguson, Freddie Grey in Baltimore, Rodney King in Los Angeles, so on, and so forth…

Triggers

Freddie Grey

86

1. Systemic Territorial Inequalities

 

2. Systemic Stigma

 

3. Systemic Police Repression

 

4. Contradictory Ideologies: equality and repression

 

5. Weak Advocacy Organizations

 

6. Killings and Police Brutality as Triggers

Summary

State-Level Comprehensive Anti-Immigration Laws

State

Passed

Arizona

April 2010

Utah

March 2011

Georgia

April 2011

Indiana

May 2011

Alabama

June 2011

South Carolina

June 2011

__MACOSX/._9. Urban Rebellions - Punk and Riots Winter 2020.pptx