Synthesis Paper
kkgerrald4
751Rubrics-ng.xlsxSkillBuilder
| Dr. Meeks Rubrics (MADM751: Entrepreneurship, Innovation & Creativity): Skillbuilder | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Weak | Poor | |||||
| 1 | Assignment Word Count (total number of words in Skill Builder) | 90-100%: More than 1,500 words (excluding references, tables, diagrams) | 80-89%: 1200-1,500 words (excluding references, tables, diagrams) | 70-79%: 900-1200 words (excluding references, tables, diagrams) | 60-70%: 700-900 words (excluding references, tables, diagrams) | 0%: Less than 700 words (excluding references, tables, diagrams) | 100% | ||
| 2 | Question Word Count (completeness of each question) | 90-100%: 200+ words per question. All questions. | 80-89%: Minimum of 150-200 words per question. All questions. | 70-79%: Minimum of 125-150 words per question. All questions. | 60-69%: 100-125 words per question. All questions. | 0%: Less than 100 words on any question. | 100% | ||
| 3 | Acumen Demonstration (demonstrate command of course concepts) | 90-100%: In a fashion that demonstrates understanding, directly addresses 8+ topics from the assigned readings/videos. | 80-89%: In a fashion that demonstrates understanding, directly addresses 6-8 topics from the assigned readings/videos. | 70-79%: In a fashion that demonstrates understanding, directly addresses 5-6 topics from the assigned readings/videos. | 60-69%: In a fashion that demonstrates understanding, directly addresses 4-5 topics from assigned readings/videos. | 0%: Fails to directly address in each section at least 4 topics from assigned readings/videos. | 95% | ||
| 4 | Personal Application (apply course concepts to personal life/job/career) | 90-100%: Directly and extensively applies course concepts (for the specific module) to student's personal situation (job/career/life). | 80-89%: Directly applies course concepts (for the specific module) to student's personal situation (job/career/life). | 70-80%: Somewhat applies course concepts (for the specific module) to student's personal situation (job/career/life). | 60-70%: Weakly applies course concepts (for the specific module) to student's personal situation (job/career/life). | 0%: Fails to directly apply course concepts (for the specific module) . | 100% | ||
| 5 | Timeliness/FileType (submitted on time in correct format) | 90-100%: submitted prior to deadline in readable WORD format | 80-89%: submitted prior to deadline but some trouble reading the file | 70-79%: submitted prior to deadline but required attention to fix file/type | 60-69%: submitted prior to deadline but file unreadable | 0%: submitted after the deadline | 100% | ||
| 6 | Critical Thinking (degree to which student demonstrates critical thinking) | 90-100%: Integrates and applies basic ESHIP/Business concepts and principles taught in the course. | 80-89%: Shows clear comprehension of basic ESHIP/Business concepts and principles taught in the course, and demonstrates acceptable application of these ideas. | 70-79%: Able to state basic ESHIP/Business concepts and principles taught in the course, but weak in applying these ideas. | 60-69%: Lacks understanding of basic ESHIP/Business concepts and principles taught in the course. | 0%: Fails to demonstrate understanding of the basic ESHIP/Business concepts and principles taught in the course | 100% | ||
| TOTAL SCORE | 95% | ||||||||
| How to use this rubric: Simply read each criteria (presented in each row), and determine to which category your Skill Builder qualifies (i.e. excellent, good, acceptable, weak, or poor). For example, you may feel your Skill Builder fits the "ASSIGNMENT WORD COUNT" description for the "Good" category ("Good" is 80-89% score) because your SKill Builder has 990 words (excluding references, diagrams, tables). Then make a judgement -- based on your review of your Skill Buidler -- and give your Skill Builder a score between 80% and 89% (in this example, your Skill Builder met the "Good" requirments for "Assignment Word Count"). Place that score in the column "J" (cell J3). Do this for all six criteria. Your Skill Builder score (as a percentage) will be totalled for you. This is only an estimate of your grade; however, it provides you a means of understanding how the instructor will grade your Skill Builder. The calculated total on the rubic is determined as the PRODUCT of the scores YOU input in the J3-J8 cells (that means it multiplies these numbers together - and also means that a single ZERO score will result in a ZERO total). | |||||||||
TeamWeekly
| Dr. Meeks Rubrics (MADM751: Entrepreurneurship, Innovation & Creativity): Team Projects (each submission includes both the completed PPT deck and the recorded team video) | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Weak | Poor | |||||
| 1 | Engagement (the degree to the entire team demonstrates full engagement) | 90-100%: Entire team is actively engaged and the participation manifests as strong contributions to the conversation, thus demonstrating universally strong preparation for the meeting. There are no signs of multitasking or diverted attention. | 80-89%: Entire team is mostly engaged and the conversation contributions by each member are strong. Students demonstrate good preparation for the meeting. There are no signs of multitasking or diverted attention. | 70-79%: Entire team is mostly engaged and the conversation contributions by each member are good. Students demonstrate good preparation for the meeting. There are only minimal signs of multitasking or diverted attention. | 60-69%: All members are engaged and contribute, but the contributions are weak. There are minimal signs of sound preparation by members. | 0%: Team member(s) get distracted or are workign on other projects. Members not fully engged, or not actively contributing. | 100% | ||
| 2 | Meaningful Interaction (the degree to which the team meaningfully interacts on the video) | 90-100%: the entire team demonstrates genuine engagement during entire the team video. The interaction is both exceptionally effective and efficient. | 80-89%: the entire team is predominantly engaged during entire the team video. The interaction is mostly effective and efficient. | 70-79%: the entire team is engaged for most of the team video, and the conversation interaction is weak reagrding effectiveness and efficency. | 60-70%: one or more team members are somewhat disengaged, resulting in a teammeeting that is ineffective and inefficient. | 0%: team video shows little or no meaningful interaction, students appear to simply go through of completing an assignment. | 100% | ||
| 3 | Insight (degree to which PPT & Video provide insights into mgt beyond what is covered in asigned readings/videos) | 90-100%: The video and PPT deck provide 3 or more insights into ESHIP/Business. | 80-89%: The video and PPT deck provide 2 insights into ESHIP/Business. | 70-79%: The video and PPT deck provide a single insight into ESHIP/Business. | 60-69%: The video and PPT deck provide weak or incomplete insights into ESHIP/Business. | 0%: Video & PPT simply replicate the assigned materials w/out providing additional insights. | 100% | ||
| 4 | Full Video Participation (all members are shown in the video) | 90-100%: All team members appear in the team video simultaneously, and the PPT deck appears in the background of video, synchronized to the audio (voices). | 80-89%: All team members appear in the team video simultaneously, and the PPT deck appears in the background of video. | 70-79%: All team members appear in the team video simultaneously. | 60-70%: All team members appear in the team video, but not simultaneously. | 0%: The video does not show all members of the team that are participating during the meeting. | 100% | ||
| 5 | Professional Format (the degree to which the PPT & Video have a professional look) | 90-100%: Both the PPT and the video have a professional look, are easy to read and understand. Shows attention to detail; all margins, spacing & indentations are correct; PPT is neat and correctly assembled. | 80-89%: Margins, spacing, and indentations are correct; PPT/video are neat and correctly assembled, but formatting elements do not always support main points; elements are used consistently throughout. | 70-79%: Margins, spacing, & indentations are generally correct; PPT/video are neat and correctly assembled, but the overall look lacks professionalism and elegance. | 60-69%: Fails to adequately provide a professional look; incorrect margins, spacing and indentation; neatness of PPT/video need attention. | 0%: Formatting is inconsistent, lacks a professional look, and detracts from the PPT/video. | 100% | ||
| 6 | Acumen Demonstration (demonstrate command of course concepts) | 90-100%: PPT & video directly address 6+ topics from the assigned readings/videos. | 80-89%: PPT & video directly address 4-5 topics from the assigned readings/videos. | 70-79%: PPT & video directly address 3 topics from the assigned readings/videos. | 60-69%: PPT & video directly address 1-2 topics from the assigned readings/videos. | 0%: Fails to directly address at least 1 topic from assigned readings/videos. | 95% | ||
| 7 | Personal Application (apply course concepts to personal life/job/career) | 90-100%: Directly applies to personal situations/examples the course concepts throughout PPT/video (the conversation). | 80-89%: Predominately applies to personal situations/examples the course concepts in the PPT/video. | 70-80%: Partially applies to personal situations/examples the course concepts in the PPT/video. | 60-70%: Weakly applies to personal situations/examples the course concepts in the PPT/video. | 0%: Fails to apply to personal situations/examples the course concepts in the PPT/video. | 100% | ||
| 8 | Critical Thinking (degree to which student demonstrates critical thinking) | 90-100%: Integrates and applies basic ESHIP/Business concepts/principles taught in the course. | 80-89%: Shows clear comprehension of basic ESHIP/Business concepts/principles taught in the course, and demonstrates acceptable application of these ideas. | 70-79%: Able to state basic ESHIP/Business concepts/principles taught in the course, but weak in applying these ideas. | 60-69%: Lacks understanding of basic ESHIP/Business concepts/principles taught in the course. | 0%: Fails to demonstrate understanding of the basic ESHIP/Business concepts/principles taught in the course | 100% | ||
| 9 | Timeliness/FileType (submitted on time in correct format) | 90-100%: submitted PPT & video prior to deadline in readable format. | 80-89%: submitted PPT & video prior to deadline but some trouble reading files | 70-79%: submitted prior to deadline but required attention to fix file/type | 60-69%: submitted prior to deadline but file unreadable | 0%: submitted after the deadline | 100% | ||
| 10 | Conciseness (efficient communication, clear arguments, statement, get to the point, logical organization) | 90-100%: Extremely concise and succinct, yet meaningful/coherent. | 80-89%: Concise but lacking somewhat in meaningfulness/coherence. | 70-79%: Wordy and lacking succintness, yet good coherence and meaningful. | 60-69%: Weak in succinctness, coherence, and meaningfulness. | 0%: Rambling without getting to thepoint. Poor coherence. | 100% | ||
| TOTAL SCORE | 95% | ||||||||
| How to use this rubric: Simply read each criteria (presented in each row), and determine to which category your PPT/video qualifies (i.e. excellent, good, acceptable, weak, or poor). For example, you may feel your PPT/video fits the "Engagement" description for the "Good" category ("Good" is 80-89% score). Then make a judgement based on your review of your PPT/video, and give your PPT/video a score between 80% and 89% (in this example, your PPT/video met the "Good" requirments for "Engagement"). Place that score in the colume "J" (cell J3). Do this for all ten criteria. Your PPT/video score (as a percentage) will be totalled for you. This is only an estimate of your grade; however, it provides you a means of understanding how the instructor will grade your PPT/video. The calculated total on the rubic is determined as the PRODUCT of the scores YOU input in the J3-J12 cells (that means it multiplies these numbers together - and also means that a single ZERO score will result in a ZERO total). | |||||||||
Synthesis
| Dr. Meeks Rubrics (MADM751: Entrepreneurship, Innovation & Creativity): Synthesis Paper | |||||||||
| Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Weak | Poor | |||||
| 1 | Professional Format (the degree to which the paper is professionally formatted) | 90-100%: Paper has outstanding formatting, spacing, font size, heading formatting, page breaks and an overall clean and professional appearance. Formatting increases the ease of reading. Shows attention to detail; all margins, spacing & indentations are correct; essay is neat and correctly assembled. | 80-89%: Margins, spacing, and indentations are correct; essay is neat and correctly assembled, but formatting elements do not always support main points; elements are used consistently throughout. | 70-79%: Margins, spacing, and indentations are generally correct; essay is neat and correctly assembled, but the overall look lack professionalism and elegance. | 60-69%: Fails to adequately follow format and assignment requirements; incorrect margins, spacing and indentation; neatness of essay needs attention. | 0%: Formatting is inconsistent, lacks a professional look, and detracts from the paper. | 100% | ||
| 2 | Report Word Count (total number of words in report) | 90-100%: 500-600 words (excluding references, tables, diagrams) | 80-89%: 480-499 words (excluding references, tables, diagrams) | 70-79%: 460-479 words (excluding references, tables, diagrams) | 60-70%: 400-459 words (excluding references, tables, diagrams) | 0%: Less than 400 words (excluding references, tables, diagrams) | 100% | ||
| 3 | Abstract (length, and quality to which it sumamrizes paper) | 100% No Longer Applies No Abstract | 100% No Longer Applies No Abstract | 100% No Longer Applies No Abstract | 100% No Longer Applies No Abstract | 100% No Longer Applies No Abstract | 100% | ||
| 4 | References (# - appropriateness - correct citation) | 100% No longer applies. Refs not required. | 100% No longer applies. Refs not required. | 100% No longer applies. Refs not required. | 100% No longer applies. Refs not required. | 100% No longer applies. Refs not required. | 100% | ||
| 5 | Acumen Demonstration (demonstrate command of course concepts) | 90-100%: Directly addresses 4+ topics from the assigned readings/videos in each section. | 80-89%: Directly addresses 3-4 topics from the assigned readings/videos in each section. | 70-79%: Directly addresses 2-3 topics from the assigned readings/videos in each section. | 60-69%: Directly addresses 1-2 topics from assigned readings/videos in each section. | 0%: Fails in directly address in each section at least 1 topic from assigned readings/videos. | 95% | ||
| 6 | Personal Application (apply course concepts to personal life/job/career) | 90-100%: Directly applies course concepts in all sections of paper. | 80-89%: Directly applies course concepts in all but 1-2 sections of paper. | 70-80%: Directly applies course concepts in all but 3-4 sections of paper. | 60-70%: Directly applies course concepts in all but 5-6 sections of paper. | 0%: Fails to directly apply course concepts in 5 or more sections of paper. | 100% | ||
| 7 | Writing Clarity (effective communication, clear purpose, logical organization, well-constructed sentences, precise word choice) | 90-100%: ALL sentences are completely clear. There are NO places where a reader would be confused. Used smooth, clear, readable prose in a superior way throughout, no clichés or wordiness, consistently effective word choice. | 80-89%: 1-2 sentences are not completely clear. There are 1-2 places where a reader would be confused. Used smooth, clear, readable prose throughout most of paper, few clichés, occasional wordiness, generally appropriate word choice. | 70-79%: 3-6 sentences are not completely clear. There are 3-6 places where a reader would be confused. Used smooth, clear, readable prose throughout most of paper, few clichés, occasional wordiness, generally appropriate word choice. | 60-69%: Lacked smooth, clear, readable prose, contains clichés and wordiness, generally ineffective word choice, Sentence structure, word choice, lack of transitions and/or sequencing of ideas make reading and understanding difficult. | 0%: Writing lacks focus, is generally incoherent, thoughts are incompletely developed. | 100% | ||
| 8 | Timeliness/FileType (submitted on time in correct format) | 90-100%: submitted prior to deadline in readable WORD format | 80-89%: submitted prior to deadline but some trouble reading the file | 70-79%: submitted prior to deadline but required attention to fix file/type | 60-69%: submitted prior to deadline but file unreadable | 0%: submitted after the deadline | 100% | ||
| 9 | Critical Thinking (degree to which student demonstrates critical thinking) | 90-100%: Integrates and applies basic ESHIP and business concepts/principles taught in the course. | 80-89%: Shows clear comprehension of basic ESHIP/Business concepts/principles taught in the course, and demonstrates acceptable application of these ideas. | 70-79%: Able to state basic ESHIP/Business concepts/principles taught in the course, but weak in applying these ideas. | 60-69%: Lacks understanding of basic ESHIP/Business concepts/principles taught in the course. | 0%: Fails to demonstrate understanding of the basic ESHIP/Business concepts/principles taught in the course | 100% | ||
| 10 | Grammar/Spelling (# of spelling/grammar errors) | 90-100%: 0-2 spelling or grammar errors | 80-89%: 3-4 spelling or grammar errors | 70-79%: 5-8 spelling or grammar errors | 60-69%: 9-15 spelling or grammar errors | 0%: more than 15 spelling/grammar errors | 100% | ||
| TOTAL SCORE | 95.00% | ||||||||
| How to use this rubric: Simply read each criteria (presented in each row), and determine to which category your paper qualifies (i.e. excellent, good, acceptable, weak, or poor). For example, you may feel your paper fits the "Writing Clarity" description for the "Good" category ("Good" is 80-89% score). Then make a judgement based on your review of your paper, and give your paper a score between 80% and 89% (in this example, your paper met the "Good" requirments for "Writing Clarity"). Place that score in the colume "J" (cell J10). Do this for all ten criteria. Your paper score (as a percentage) will be totalled for you. This is only an estimate of your grade, however, it provides you a means of understanding how the instruictor will grade your paper. The calculated total on the rubic is determined as the PRODUCT of the scores YOU input in the J3-J12 cells (that means it multiplies these numbers together - and also means that a single ZERO score will result in a ZERO total). | |||||||||
| Minimum word count: 500 (excluding, abstract, title page, diagrams, and references) | |||||||||
| Minimum References: References are optional. | |||||||||
| Note: This rubric was originally built for a paper requiring a minimum of 2,500 words. |
Grade
| Use this worksheet to calculate your current/ongoing grade in the course (based on submitted assignments) | |||||||||
| ---Simply insert the grades for the assignments you have submitted | |||||||||
| You may also use this worksheet to predict your grade for the course (a "what-if" scenario tool) | |||||||||
| ---Simply insert the grades you believe you will earn in upcoming assignments | |||||||||
| Note: once you enter a "zero" the algorithm assumes you earned a "zero" on the assignment, so if you wish to remove an entry, delete it rather than entering a "zero" | |||||||||
| Note: you may only enter into the GREEN cells (everything else is locked) | |||||||||
| Team Projects | Possible Points | Enter Actual Points Here | Actual % | ||||||
| TP1: Video/PPT | 20 | 20 | 100.0% | 20 | WARNING | ||||
| TP2: Video/PPT | 30 | 0 | DO NOT enter a "zero" score unless | ||||||
| TP3: Video/PPT | 60 | 0 | you actually earned a "zero" on that | ||||||
| TP4: Video/PPT | 70 | 0 | assignment (or expect to earn a "zero" | ||||||
| TP5: Video/PPT | 70 | 0 | on that assignment). Otherwise your | ||||||
| Team Canvas | 100 | 0 | grade will not compute correctly. | ||||||
| Total | 350 | 20 | 20 | ||||||
| Individual Projects | |||||||||
| Skill Builder #1 | 100 | 0 | |||||||
| Skill Builder #2 | 100 | 0 | |||||||
| Skill Builder #3 | 100 | 0 | |||||||
| Skill Builder #4 | 100 | 0 | |||||||
| Skill Builder #5 | 100 | 0 | |||||||
| Synthesis Paper | 150 | 0 | |||||||
| Total | 650 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Your Grade Components | |||||||||
| Team | 100.00% | ||||||||
| Individual | |||||||||
| Your Grade for Course: | 100.00% | ||||||||
| Your Grade for Course: | A | ||||||||
