TNT 700.8IP The Instructional Cycle-24-25

Criteria Ratings Data Quality Exemplary 10 pts. Proficient 8 pts. Developing 6 pts. Novice 0 - 4 pts.

Data is accurate, thorough and detailed providing great insight into student performance on targeted objective(s).

The included graphic adds clarity and allows the viewer to see trends in the data.

Data sufficiently provides insight into student performance on targeted objective(s).

The included graphic adds clarity and may allow the viewer to see trends in the data.

Data provides some insight into student performance on targeted objective(s), but lacks clarity and detail.

The included graphic lacks clarity. Trends in data are not readily apparent.

Data provides little or no insight into student performance on targeted objective(s), and lacks clarity and detail.

The included graphic does not add clarity trends are not readily apparent; or, there is no visualization of the data provided.

Data Analysis Exemplary 20 pts. Proficient 16 pts. Developing 12 pts. Novice 0 - 8 pts.

Next steps for instruction are based on thorough and detailed analysis of data clearly indicating research-based targeted support to individuals OR groups to improve their learning on assessed learning objectives.

Detailed description of learning interventions identify rationale for selection of activities.

Rationale is explicitly supported by evidence from the data analysis previously performed.

Next steps for instruction are based on sufficient analysis of data indicating research-based targeted support to individuals OR groups to improve their learning on assessed learning objectives.

Interventions are described, including generic rationale for inclusion of learning activities.

Rationale is adequately supported by some evidence from data analysis.

Next steps for instruction propose general support that improves student learning related to assessed learning objectives. Next steps are loosely connected with research and/or theory.

Some learning activities are described.

May be lacking rationale or rationale is unsubstantiated by data evidence.

Next steps for instruction lack clarity or analysis of the data and may relate superficially or not at all to the assessed learning objectives. Research/theory is inadequate of missing.

There is little or no evidence of planning based on identified student needs.

Rationale is missing.

Best Practices Exemplary 10 pts. Proficient 8 pts. Developing 6 pts. Novice 0 - 4 pts.

Specific references to research-based best practices are made throughout the analysis to address the needs of all learners.

Sufficient references to research-based best practices are made in the analysis to address the needs of all learners.

Some references to research-based best practices are made in the analysis to address the needs of some learners.

References to research- based best practices are grossly inadequate and may not address the needs of the students.

Professional Writing Exemplary 10 pts. Proficient 8 pts. Developing 6 pts. Novice 0 - 4 pts.

Paper meets minimum requirements for Exemplary minimum 4 pages, excluding tables or graphs. Paper written with one-inch margins; 1.5 or 2-spaced, Times New Roman 12 pt. font. No obvious spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors.

Paper meets minimum requirements for Proficient - minimum 3 pages, excluding tables or graphs. Paper written with one-inch margins; 1.5 or 2-spaced, Times New Roman 12 pt. font. Less than three spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors.

Paper meets minimum requirements for Developing - minimum 2 pages, excluding tables or graphs. Paper written with one-inch margins; 1.5 or 2-spaced,Times New Roman 12 pt. font. More than three spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors.

Paper does not meet minimum qualifications