international entrepreneurship
LaSquadra01
6GN502CriticalEvaluationReflectionTemplate2022-231.docx
International Entrepreneurship 6GN502
CW2 – Critical Evaluation & Reflection Template
AY 2022-23
|
Student Number: |
Part 1 - Critical Evaluation
Select and critically evaluate one model, framework or theory which you have used in CW1 (excluding either PESTLE or SWOT).
You will need to include robust, academic references to support your critical evaluation and to demonstrate academic underpinning (eg academic journal articles, textbooks). Ideally, these sources should not be journalistic or web based. They should be presented using Harvard referencing.
You are NOT allowed to critically evaluate either PESTLE or SWOT.
Use the template below and will be 1,000 words +/- 10%.
|
Name of Model, Framework or Theory to be critically evaluated:
|
|
Diagram of Model, Framework or Theory (if appropriate):
|
|
Critical Evaluation of Model, Framework or Theory:
(1,000 words +/- 10%) |
|
References:
|
[This part of report worth 30%]
Part 2 - Reflection
Reflect on the following question:
What did you do in the formative exercise, what have you learnt from this formative exercise and the subsequent feedback, and how has this learning helped your CW1 submission, and also in the future?
You will need to include robust, academic references to support your reflections and to demonstrate academic underpinning (eg academic journal articles, textbooks). Ideally, these sources should not be journalistic or web based. They should be presented using Harvard referencing.
Use the template below and will be 1,000 words +/- 10%.
(NB: It is recommended that the 1,000 words are split relatively evenly across the What, So What and Now What sections).
Please ensure you reflect on the above question to fully answer the brief. Reflections which do not address the impact of the formative exercise will have this fact taken into consideration during marking.
|
What? Go back over your learning, the formative exercise, the feedback and your international entrepreneurship experience during the module (positive and/or negative), select areas to focus on and identify what happened and what you did. For example, what did you do during the formative exercise? What formative feedback did you receive, and what did you do? What academic content underpins your description? This is the descriptive foundation of your reflection and is a divergent approach to generate ideas, detail content and reconstruct events.
|
|
(333 words +/- 10%) |
|
So What? Describing your experience is not enough – you need to analyse things in detail from different angles to try and make sense of your experience and work out why this is significant. What have you learnt at a deeper level? What do you now understand about yourself in relation to the formative exercise? How does your experience relate to theory? Why choose the specific formative feedback you have to improve your work? What does the formative feedback you received mean for your approach to learning, the application of your international entrepreneurship models, frameworks and/or theories and the quality of your work? This is a convergent approach to analyse your experience from a variety of perspectives.
|
|
(333 words +/- 10%) |
|
Now What? Now that you have a better understanding of your experience, what will/did you do with the insights gained from the formative exercise and feedback, your approach to learning, the application of your international entrepreneurship models, frameworks and/or theories and the quality of your work in the future? How will you be different? Or do things differently? What worked well that you could use again or adapt in the future? What should you avoid and why? Distil the most relevant lessons and determine how and where they can be applied.
|
|
(333 words +/- 10%) |
|
References:
|
[This part of report worth 30%]
IMPORTANT – Please save and submit this document under the title:
· 6GN502 CW2 ‘Your Student No.’
Do not put your name on the title or within the report.
Sensitivity: Internal
