The two principles are: if there are less harmful methods of intervention, then they ought to be utilized as opposed to military intervention; and getting involved in a war for a cause that is hopeless may be an act that is noble but it is not ethical.
The problem with the UN Charter with respect to the above mentioned principles is that the UN is usually quick to war when a country is in defiance to world peace.
The just war theory intends to spread a message against war and against killing.
2. In what sense does Beitz believe that the conditions of just war are necessary or sufficient in justifying humanitarian interventions?
Beitz is of the opinion that if less methods of intervention are present, then they ought to be utilized as opposed to military intervention.
3. Does Beitz believe that the conditions of just war show when humanitarian intervention is required?
Beitz was of the conviction that the conditions of just war will always show the moment humanitarian intervention is needed. He is of the opinion that military invention is not always the answer.
4. How does Beitz’ account of “just cause” differ from Boyle’s? Which additional conditions of just war does Beitz discuss which Boyle did not?
Boyle posited that a just cause is never punitive nor is it preventative. Boyle also was of the opinion that invading other nations is legitimate if their lack of consent to invasion happens to be a just cause
Boyle’s addition conditions were that harmful methods of intervention should always be considered as opposed to military intervention. Boyle further added that world powers should be against war and against killing.
5. Which condition of just war theory does Beitz suggest is commonly misunderstood by those who criticize it? Explain.
Beitz is of the opinion that those who criticize the just war theory fail to realize that it only sees war as a last resort. Critics forget that the just war theory is against the killing of innocents, looks to prevent the totality of destruction and sexual crimes, and also desires the autonomy of both state and individual.
6. Which condition of just war theory does Beitz suggest may be the most restrictive?
The condition of just war theory that come out as most restrictive include anti-war and personal pacifism.
7. Does Beitz’ comment on mixed motives contradict Boyle’s account of right intention?
Beitz is of the opinion that not all nations that engage in humanitarian missions have good intentions for warring countries, some look to pursue personal gains. Boyle’s account o right intention does not mention that.
8. Does Beitz believe that a policy of humanitarian intervention must be consistent to be justifiable?
Humanitarian interventions need not be characterized by double standards such that the parties involved only take up missions that will benefit them economically. Consistency and justification resonates with ending tyranny and terrorism in countries that are poverty stricken and also doing the same in oil rich gulf countries.
Kevingao
68WarTerrorismBeitz1Four4.docx
0
